Lonelygirl15

Taig · Enthusiastic Fan Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 373

well frankly...it looks like someone is coming in "handy" if you get my immature drift

Sami · Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject:

But seriously... It looks like she's trying to open something
_________________
"Have you uff da'd today?" - Broken Kid

deagol · Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:13 pm Post subject:

There is nothing. The distinct line behind her fingers is the base of the palm of her hand with the dark of her jeans in the background on the left of the line, and her palm in flesh tones on the right.

oxdeltaxo · Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject:

Lurker · Guest

TheAnie · Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:40 pm Post subject:

I do not think there is anything in her hands. At first I did and when I saw the comment on the comments board I figured I'd ask everyone else. Now when I look at the picture I notice the crook between her side and her arm is the same color as the space in her hands(I think it's just the color of the bricks). And she is holding her hands in a way that would suggest she is holding something but there is nothing there. Instead that suggests to me that she is used to holding something palm sized when she gets nervous.

Either way, it didn't come into play if she was holding something so I don't think this is something to argue over.
_________________
Proud member of the Sarah fan club and the Lurker fan club.

aboriginalgangster · Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:22 am Post subject:

oxdeltaxo · Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:21 am Post subject:

Lurker · Guest

All I see is a lot of open space between her fingers, and then her palm. I agree that it's self-evident, oxdeltaxo, but toward the opposite conclusion. If you hold your hand like that, then from the angle of the camera, the heel of the palm should be visible due to the bending of the hand. This is what that looks like.

oxdeltaxo · Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:59 am Post subject:

Lurker · Guest

In this shot you definitely see palm skin between her index and middle fingers. There's also her palms being flat against her pants before she sat down to consider.

If anyone wants to pursue this further, more power to them, I guess, but I'm positive there's nothing there. I say this because of the above reasons, and because if there were something, it would have probably been presented at least such that you'd be able to identify whatever it's supposed to be (if only by shape). This just seems like another lightswitch, attic, or reflection-in-Bree's-eye scenario to me.

oxdeltaxo · Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:54 am Post subject:

Lurker · Guest

The birth mark (or scar, whichever it is) was unobscured, though, and had a definite, recognizable shape. One only needed to pause the video at that specific second and they could see it. It was inarguably there. In this case, there's no such definitive conclusion to be drawn, much less what the shape or size would be.

Again, though, those who want to pursue it may. I just don't see what potential "aha" moment could arise from this, or what there is to pursue.

Skunkwaffle · Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:37 am Post subject:

You guys remember the Loch Ness Monster.

Before widespread reports of some huge thing living in the lake circulated, no one really every reported anything out of the ordinary. But once the story started to sightings, there were sightings all over the place.

I really kind of feel that that's whats happening here.
_________________
Yeah, you got... stuck a fish in the face.