Lonelygirl15

Broken Kid · Site Admin Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 5276

Theories of why he's called Danielbeast:

1) Connection between Daniel of the bible and the beast of the bible. Perhaps dichotomy of good and evil, or perhaps Daniel = the beast?

2) Alestair Crowley was called (and called himself) "The Beast". Perhaps this is making a connection between Daniel and Bree's religion? But if he is turned off by her religion, why the connection?

3) It's a term of endearment from Bree.

4) Perhaps he's like the ox in "Helper", trying to lead her and force her where she wants to go...

Any other theories/thoughts?
_________________
President of the Owen Fan Club

Kasdeja · Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:54 am Post subject:

There's that whole Crowley being called The Beast thing, too.

Broken Kid · Site Admin Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 5276

Kasdeja · Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:00 am Post subject:

Maybe Bree came up with the name? Who knows. I personally favor the Bible connotations, especially with all the biblical references going on of late. The Crowley thing is just something that's definitely been discussed a lot, though, so thought it should be added.

Farva · Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:02 am Post subject:

well if it's supposed to be secretive and such, maybe Daniel actually -IS- part of the religion, and part of this whole thing involves a trial by temptation...which he provides by seeming to be romantically involved and pushed away by her religion, forcing the "me or them" choice.

wintermute · Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:02 am Post subject:

Also, what's regarded as the first ARG was called "Beast." I think Lonesome October made that connection in one of his videos...

'mute
_________________
Proud member of LG15 Defense Force.
Proud member of "The Five" (who have been "Tagged" by Hymn of One).

'vote 'mute in '16!

Xela · Suspiciously Absent Joined: 20 Sep 2006 Posts: 3

It seemed the name first came about in the episode where she is trying to get him on camera. It was like she was a steve irwin (r.i.p. Sad

) type person observing the wild Danielbeast. But this might interfere with when daniel set up his account. I dont really know the timeframe of all this.

At any rate, I dont think its a reference to THE beast. As nosy and annoying Dasniel has become, I don't think he will end up the villain in this story.

atomikbr · Casual Observer Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 72

I think it has to do with the "moonchild" novel from crowley: somebody else spotted it better than me here.
In Moonchild both "evil priests" (black magicians) and white magicians (whose leader was a literary translation of crowley "the Beast" himself) were trying to give birth to the "moonchild" through the same girl.
Look for the moonchild in Wikipedia, or else in this forum there's a good explanation of the plot, somwhere.

Aysmptotes · Suspiciously Absent Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Posts: 1

It could be possible that Daniel is the reincarnation of Crowley, I know that might seem far out there, or that Crowley was in correct in thinking that he himself was the beast, which could mean that Daniel could not help but to insult Bree's religion since he himself defies what Crowley stated himself to be.

Another reason for me thinking that he is the Beast is that he was able to view the ceremony and not get caught. It looked like there were secret service people there and those people i would think would notice some fumbling teenager out in the woods, that kid can't to stealthy. It is possible that he was supposed to be there since. A few signs point to that Bree is to become the Scarlet Woman, who is depicted as riding The Beast. And I think that Bree knows that she should ride him from that Proving Science Wrong video in which she associates him to a domesticated animal. and i believe that she associated him with a horse, which one rides. Althought she proved that he could not to work as a horse, she did not prove that she could not ride him.

Pi · Casual Observer Joined: 04 Nov 2006 Posts: 111

KimmyKrump · Suspiciously Absent Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Posts: 10

After talking about human microchip implants on the video page, I kinda got off on a wikipedia-ing tangent and ended up reading the "Number of the Beast" entry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast

Am now a little scared that Daniel was sent by the order.

I'm hoping the Daniel Biblical references are closer to the truth in the plot. It could be that the Number of the Beast stuff is represented by the tattoos on the watchers' hands (someone probably already thought of this) and DanielBeast represents a whole other kind of non-Crowley-related beast as others have theorized.

rawrxbang · Suspiciously Absent Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 9

I think he is deffinetly not the beast. In Tachyon's new video she exposed Gemma as a fraud. Gemma actually lives in the US. But anyways Daniel is Bree's only true friend. Daniel loves her for crying out loud!!!
_________________
Austin Undead ™

"We are all dead. And this is hell."

Broken Kid · Site Admin Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 5276

nobackspacebutton · Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:38 am Post subject:

All this definately brings our eyes toward Daniel and the possibility that he is related to Crowley for some reason.

Could he, our "hero", really be the bad one? If Gemma was saying to trust in Daniel and go home (and if you recall, they shouldn't go home because OpAphid is waiting for them), and Daniel was completely on board for going home no matter what ---even to the extent of leaving Bree-- maybe he isn't afraid of the order at all. Maybe he is part of the order...and his last video was an attempt to show Bree that everything is fine at home...a trick to make her come back.

When Gemma said in the chat that Bree should only trust Daniel and not to even trust her if she didn't want to--Gemma could be dropping Bree a clue as to not to trust her..which means --> NOT TO TRUST DANIEL.
_________________
What ever happened to that girl BA?

BA Tells Lies.

Some things are secret for a reason.
There are people whose lives are dedicated to keeping them that way.

watermelonhead · Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:27 am Post subject: