View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gidget Devoted Fan

Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 596 Location: Right behind you
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think this is a touchy issue all around: age differences, mental states of mind, possible manipulation on both ends.
I just wanted to point out that it was a very gray area legally and morally.
I really think (and hope) that it will turn out that Jonas was just bragging and showing off (kind of like Daniel in the "Bree and I hooked up" video). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aerrow Devoted Fan

Joined: 04 Jun 2007 Posts: 897 Location: Somewhere.. In the shadows..
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's only a two year difference, legally here there is a 2yr rule at 18+ like if you turn 18 and your g/f or b/f is 16 it's still okay for you two to do wtv you want.. so 19 and 17 isnt bad at all.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Killthesmiley The Order of Denderah

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 4732 Location: Halifax NS Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Languorous Lass wrote: | Killthesmiley wrote: | well they just released someone from jail that is under the same circumstances stating habious corpus (did i spell that right Lass??????) |
It's "habeus corpus," actually. But I'm impressed you even knew the term.
And I'm not sure what you're saying, Kelly. Somebody just got let out of jail? What state was that in? |
I believe it was in georgia...lemme dig out the CNN article.
There is an Appeal right now blocking it
ps: thanks for the surprised in my legal jargon. lol. I watch a lot of legally blond. I've surprisingly learned a lot from those movies. Plus having a lawyer helps.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/06/11/teen.sex.case/index.html _________________ kelly
YOU: Who does that KTS think she is? Total bitch!
ME: I think I'm you, only better.
~Kelly, KMurr, and Kellylen <3~ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hella Casual Observer
Joined: 25 May 2007 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh dang! im sorry, i didnt mean to make any accusations! im still under the impression that they didnt have sex and for some reason i always feel like everyone is on the same page as me (lol) but yeah, i didnt mean to make accusations i was just pointing something out. also here im about to point something else out, i think in california youre not allowed to even have sex as a minor which is what bree is, being 17 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Spades Owen's Helper

Joined: 08 Apr 2007 Posts: 1679 Location: Cassie is watching, and so is everyone else, she's not that special.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Goddamnit, Lurker beat me to the punch again...
Wait, why is he not allowed to hate a character now? Sometimes it sounds like it would be more acceptable if he hated an actual person.
Anyway, I was a random jackass talking about statutory rape.
But I do not think that this will take any precedence in the story. It would be very lame. Plus, Bree, being a kidnapper and all would most likely be wrestled to the ground before she could talk. Which would also be kinda dumb.
But, maybe if TAAG was on the run from the cops, it would add some sense of urgency. _________________ I like music, a lot. And yea, that's it.
Oh ****, forgot about beer.
And I listened to that song, and it sucked. No offense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rupaZer0 Lonely Fan

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 205 Location: Rotherham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to express my thanks to Susan for posting the actual law clause. I think that makes this issue pretty clear.
Times like this I feel really bad for guys. Seems like we automatically place a lot of responsibility on their shoulders to make sure women are completely, 100% okay with a sexual encounter. _________________ Cut scene to BDJ in a lubed-up cuddlefest. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheAnie Suspiciously Absent

Joined: 26 May 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Nirvana Nowhere
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think they had sex. He's blinded by love but not nearly that stupid I hope.
Also, Bree herself wouldn't prosecute him. And I don't see any parents anywhere. *looks around* So how much trouble could they really get in? I agree that if they did the deed then Jonas needs to be slapped pretty freakin hard. If it wasn't obvious before it's obvious now that Bree is in NO state to be making such decisions.
So maybe we should be less worried about the legal ramifications of it(I doubt the creators want Jonas arrested) and more about what that could have done to Bree emotionally. Whatever interaction they shared obviouslly has Jonas torn up. _________________ Proud member of the Sarah fan club and the Lurker fan club. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JustAnotherLonelyGirl. P. Monkey's Agent

Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Posts: 2094 Location: Boston
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't care enough to read through this thread, but in New York I know that if the age difference is within a reasonably close range, it isn't considered statutory rape. _________________ "Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof."
-- V For Vendetta <3 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deagol Thor's Hammer

Joined: 28 Oct 2006 Posts: 1068 Location: No, not here.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
rupaZer0 wrote: | ...
Times like this I feel really bad for guys. Seems like we automatically place a lot of responsibility on their shoulders to make sure women are completely, 100% okay with a sexual encounter. |
But it would be the same if it was a 17 year-old guy and an 18 year-old woman. So why is this bad just for guys?
TheAnie wrote: | ...
Also, Bree herself wouldn't prosecute him. And I don't see any parents anywhere. *looks around* So how much trouble could they really get in?
... |
The Order/HoO could press charges, maybe because breaking the purity bond messed up their plans for the ceremony with Bree. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RoseCrowley Owen's Helper

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 1951 Location: Orlando, Floriduh
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it'll be overlooked just like the underage drinking (not promotiing any of the following, but it does occur). _________________ RoseCrowley:I wish my tooth would fall out so i could trade it with the tooth fairy!
TTT:Granted, but the fairy takes your credit card instead of leaving money and gets like fifty lap dances w/ it.
Mawhahaha! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RoseCrowley Owen's Helper

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 1951 Location: Orlando, Floriduh
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Plus could Sarah just be assuming they had sex, just like we all have? I know probably not but it was worth a thought. lol. _________________ RoseCrowley:I wish my tooth would fall out so i could trade it with the tooth fairy!
TTT:Granted, but the fairy takes your credit card instead of leaving money and gets like fifty lap dances w/ it.
Mawhahaha! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aboriginalgangster Casual Observer

Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 61 Location: Washington state.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Statutory rape laws vary wildly from state to state. Some places still state that anyone 18 or older having sex with anyone under 18 is illegal, which leads to 18 year olds being arrested for having sex with their boyfriend or girlfriend who is a month away from turning legal age.
Most states have made it so it is still legal if the younger person is of legal consenting age and the older person is no more than a certain number of months older, as was mentioned by someone else. How much older varies so much in different states, though, that we can't know if this would be considered statutory rape until we know where they're hiding out. Most states let the age range be at least 2 years, though, so they're probably in the clear.
This is a very gray territory for lawmakers. I think it was only a few years ago that Texas finally legalized sodomy, which effectively made it illegal to be have sex and be gay. And let's also not forget that in some places the purchase of certain sex toys is still illegal. Just because something is illegal doesn't automatically make it wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RoseCrowley Owen's Helper

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 1951 Location: Orlando, Floriduh
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very true abo _________________ RoseCrowley:I wish my tooth would fall out so i could trade it with the tooth fairy!
TTT:Granted, but the fairy takes your credit card instead of leaving money and gets like fifty lap dances w/ it.
Mawhahaha! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TOSG Devoted Fan

Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 651
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
deagol wrote: | rupaZer0 wrote: | ...
Times like this I feel really bad for guys. Seems like we automatically place a lot of responsibility on their shoulders to make sure women are completely, 100% okay with a sexual encounter. |
But it would be the same if it was a 17 year-old guy and an 18 year-old woman. So why is this bad just for guys?
|
Because what you described would never ever be prosecuted, while the reverse sometimes is.
I think that all of this statutory rape discussion is silly, though. I'll eat my shoe if the matter ever becomes relevant to the plot - the law has been absent from the story in cases of murder, kidnapping, breaking and entering, etc... - it'd be pretty preposterous to assume that it suddenly beocmes involved here.
I think that a more important issue here is whether Bree was in the right state of mind to give consent, not whether what they did is illegal according to some pretty silly laws. _________________ I'm canon; the Creators just don't know it yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Misty Lonely Fan

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 172 Location: Berzerkely, CA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Statutory rape is one of those paper laws in California. Technically it's illegal, but it's almost never enforced on it's own, mostly it's used to jail people who did something else but there isn't enough evidence to convict them.
In any case, there isn't a chance in hell that Jonas needs to worry about it. _________________ Julia, Talyor, Sarah, Bree, will any of you Play with Me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|