| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Destrin41016
Casual Observer
Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Posts: 99
Location: NC
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:53 pm Post subject: Re: Building on Cu_Roi |
 |
|
| romy wrote: | Why were Tachyron's vids taken down?
Why did she only cut one OpAphid vid?
My theory on the answer to these questions are as follows.
I think that Tach was at one time working with The Order. That first opAphid vid is very much anti-Daniel. After the first video, they discovered her personal stuff on YT (anti-Order stuff) and took her off the OpAphid editing and made her take her vids down on purpose. That's why she would be doing the grunt work mentioned in Tach's vids.
The hole in this is that why was she allowed to post vids again. She did so on the same user. Maybe they are in code, and that is why they are ok.
Thoughts? |
i kind of assumed that tachs vids were found before they should have been...so she took them off so that no noe could watch before the time was right...
_________________
Hmmm. Too tired to wrote something meaningful here so........damn... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
horcruxes
Devoted Fan
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 740
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: Building on Cu_Roi |
|
|
| Destrin41016 wrote: | | romy wrote: | Why were Tachyron's vids taken down?
Why did she only cut one OpAphid vid?
My theory on the answer to these questions are as follows.
I think that Tach was at one time working with The Order. That first opAphid vid is very much anti-Daniel. After the first video, they discovered her personal stuff on YT (anti-Order stuff) and took her off the OpAphid editing and made her take her vids down on purpose. That's why she would be doing the grunt work mentioned in Tach's vids.
The hole in this is that why was she allowed to post vids again. She did so on the same user. Maybe they are in code, and that is why they are ok.
Thoughts? |
i kind of assumed that tachs vids were found before they should have been...so she took them off so that no noe could watch before the time was right... |
you're right.
someone mentioned that as soon as they subscribed to Tach's videos that she took them down minutes later.
WC even made a video asking Tach to put them back up.
someone found them weeks before we were meant to. and she made them private until the right time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Luv2Luvem
Devoted Fan
Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 973
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know if this has been said or not, but I thought I'd throw it out there. I noticed that TAG YOU'RE IT anagrams to I TARGET YOU.
I may be reading into it way too much, but I thought it was creepy. 
_________________
Proud member of "The Collective"
and
Official member of "The Smooth Operators"
I shall get some rest when the profile tells me to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixlr8
Lonely Fan
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 180
Location: New F'ing Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Luv2Luvem wrote: | I don't know if this has been said or not, but I thought I'd throw it out there. I noticed that TAG YOU'RE IT anagrams to I TARGET YOU.
I may be reading into it way too much, but I thought it was creepy. |
Luv,
That's a fantastic observation. Good looking out. I didn't even catch that one. I'm sure that's significant. At minimum, it's saying either Tach is the one being targeted, or the one who is targeting the destruction of Op, as they so aptly put it. Remember, we're going to be choosing our sides, and that works for both, assuming that Tach is the opposition, which seems likely IMO.
Mike
_________________
Said the masocist to the sadist, "Hurt me!"
Said the sadist to the masocist, "No." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mordrack
Lonely Fan
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 186
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm, very interesting, indeed.
Until now i thought that the 3 words had nothing to do wirh each other...
I thought that tag was a hint that we should look at the tags of the original video and you're was the name of the list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sad Panda
Devoted Fan
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 689
Location: On Tachyon's Heels ...
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:33 pm Post subject: Re: Building on Cu_Roi |
|
|
| romy wrote: |
The hole in this is that why was she allowed to post vids again. She did so on the same user. Maybe they are in code, and that is why they are ok.
Thoughts? |
... It wasn't Aphid who told her to take down the old videos, it was the other side. Wouldn't that make sense? IMHO.
_________________
Got Drama? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
romy
Casual Observer
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah - That makes more sense to me. Thanks Panda |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
evaB
Casual Observer
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 72
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it WAS OpA who made her take them down... like she was pretending to be a worker bee in the Order facility and got busted posting these personal videos and forced to take them down. That's why her computer access was "severely limited."
just makes more sense to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
covedweller
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
did she use lowercase i when saying "i learned my lesson?"
maybe Julie, or whatever name she was going under before, learned that lesson the hard way or had a close call? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
