LGPedia:UGC desk/evaluations/Tannhaus/initial - Revision history

Shiori at 05:16, 12 August 2008

2008-08-12T05:16:32Z

Tannhaus at 20:47, 15 April 2008

2008-04-15T20:47:43Z

Tannhaus at 19:01, 15 April 2008

2008-04-15T19:01:15Z

Milowent: agree to tier 2

2008-03-25T21:10:26Z

agree to tier 2

Shiori at 20:45, 25 March 2008

2008-03-25T20:45:48Z

Renegade: Created.

2008-03-25T20:32:25Z

Created.

New page

{|cellpadding="3"
|style="font-weight: bold; text-align: right;"|Series:
|[[Tannhaus]]
|-
|style="font-weight: bold; text-align: right;"|Current Tier:
|Tentative 2
|-
|style="font-weight: bold; text-align: right;"|Date:
|Added March 25th, 2008, effective as of {{color|red|April 25th, 2008}}
|-
|style="font-weight: bold; text-align: right;"|Posted by user:
|~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]])
|-
|style="font-weight: bold; text-align: right;" valign="top"|Reason for re-evaluation:
|This series was subject to the Revamp discussion, and, although tagged, overlooked. It has been added as Tentative Tier 2 to the list, like a new series, and given that it didn't have a chance to be discussed in the revamp before, we'll assume the one month grace period is in effect.
Due to the special nature of this evaluation (post-revamp revamp discussion), opinions can be added immediately, but any decision '''will not become effective before April 25th, 2008''' due to the grace period. (The two week timeout rule does not apply in this case, logically.)

As for my own, personal opinion, on one hand, the series looks rather small and barely noticed, but on the other hand, it seems to have a high count of episodes, and, and that is the important factor, in my opinion, it is the only ''factual'' UGC series there is. At least as far as I know, this is the only series that is not "fan fiction" or a spin-off, but actually discusses the "factual" data given by LG15. This, in my opinion, is notable, and, as such, '''I vote for keeping it on LGPedia as a Tier 2 series'''.<br>As a small reminder, we have a previous precedent for this kind of listing: [[The Deacons (commenter)]] will stay after the Revamp due to the fact that it is the only comments-based UGC known (and thus notable).
|}
----

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 12 August 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Hello guys. It's probably been a year since I've been here. I just dropped in to see what has changed and to make sure the URL changed pointing to me. I'm not sure about all this Tier stuff, but if anyone needs any information for this article, I'll answer any questions you might have. Just send an email to tannhaus@moderngnosis.org. I just tried to help you guys out by redesigning the article a bit. By all means, though, it is your article and you can change it/delete it as you wish. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:01, 15 April 2008 (CDT)		Hello guys. It's probably been a year since I've been here. I just dropped in to see what has changed and to make sure the URL changed pointing to me. I'm not sure about all this Tier stuff, but if anyone needs any information for this article, I'll answer any questions you might have. Just send an email to tannhaus@moderngnosis.org. I just tried to help you guys out by redesigning the article a bit. By all means, though, it is your article and you can change it/delete it as you wish. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:01, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
		+	----
		+	Given that there was a consensus on the page, and the fanfic revamp is dead, Tannhaus stays Tier 2.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 15 April 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	I also agree with a Tier 2 evaluation. Tannhaus was also the person most responsible for getting the overt Thelema imagery and plot direction removed from lonelygirl15 and the website. --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 16:10, 25 March 2008 (CDT)		I also agree with a Tier 2 evaluation. Tannhaus was also the person most responsible for getting the overt Thelema imagery and plot direction removed from lonelygirl15 and the website. --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 16:10, 25 March 2008 (CDT)

−	Hello guys. It's probably been a year since I've been here. I just dropped in to see what has changed and to make sure the URL changed pointing to me. I'm not sure about all this Tier stuff, but if anyone needs any information for this article, I'll answer any questions you might have. Just send an email to tannhaus@moderngnosis.org. I ~~would also like~~ to ~~note that as of March 22, I am now~~ a ~~consecrated Gnostic bishop~~. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:01, 15 April 2008 (CDT)	+	Hello guys. It's probably been a year since I've been here. I just dropped in to see what has changed and to make sure the URL changed pointing to me. I'm not sure about all this Tier stuff, but if anyone needs any information for this article, I'll answer any questions you might have. Just send an email to tannhaus@moderngnosis.org. I just tried to help you guys out by redesigning the article a bit. By all means, though, it is your article and you can change it/delete it as you wish. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:01, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 15 April 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I also agree with a Tier 2 evaluation. Tannhaus was also the person most responsible for getting the overt Thelema imagery and plot direction removed from lonelygirl15 and the website. --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 16:10, 25 March 2008 (CDT)		I also agree with a Tier 2 evaluation. Tannhaus was also the person most responsible for getting the overt Thelema imagery and plot direction removed from lonelygirl15 and the website. --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 16:10, 25 March 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	Hello guys. It's probably been a year since I've been here. I just dropped in to see what has changed and to make sure the URL changed pointing to me. I'm not sure about all this Tier stuff, but if anyone needs any information for this article, I'll answer any questions you might have. Just send an email to tannhaus@moderngnosis.org. I would also like to note that as of March 22, I am now a consecrated Gnostic bishop. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:01, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 25 March 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	----		----
	I think I agree with the Tier 2 evaluation, but the page needs a LOT more added. If it can't get that, I'd go with a Tier 1. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:45, 25 March 2008 (CDT)		I think I agree with the Tier 2 evaluation, but the page needs a LOT more added. If it can't get that, I'd go with a Tier 1. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:45, 25 March 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	I also agree with a Tier 2 evaluation. Tannhaus was also the person most responsible for getting the overt Thelema imagery and plot direction removed from lonelygirl15 and the website. --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 16:10, 25 March 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 25 March 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	\|}		\|}
	----		----
		+	I think I agree with the Tier 2 evaluation, but the page needs a LOT more added. If it can't get that, I'd go with a Tier 1. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:45, 25 March 2008 (CDT)