LGPedia talk:Featured articles - Revision history

-R-: /* Suggestion for next article */

2007-07-12T00:22:19Z

‎Suggestion for next article

Phoenician: idea

2007-07-01T01:27:33Z

idea

Phoenician: /* Suggestion for next article */

2007-06-30T23:04:25Z

‎Suggestion for next article

JayHenry: deemontreal would be a great feature, IMO

2007-05-14T17:32:20Z

deemontreal would be a great feature, IMO

Misty: /* Suggestion for next article */

2007-05-14T16:57:34Z

‎Suggestion for next article

Misty: /* Deemontreal */

2007-05-14T16:53:16Z

‎Deemontreal

Zoey: /* Suggestion for next article */

2007-05-12T17:57:04Z

‎Suggestion for next article

Misty: /* Suggestion for next article */

2007-05-11T15:22:54Z

‎Suggestion for next article

OwenIsCool: next feature?

2007-04-04T22:00:18Z

next feature?

Coffeeaddict at 13:45, 4 April 2007

2007-04-04T13:45:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 12 July 2007
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:: Good point Zoey, I didn't consider that. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		:: Good point Zoey, I didn't consider that. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
	:I'd like to Nominate the LG [[Crime Report]] - it's a fun article that gives a brief but detailed look into the questionable acts of BDJ (among others)! If not for the next article, then later, perhaps. (maybe after they do something REALLY bad?) --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 18:04, 30 June 2007 (CDT)		:I'd like to Nominate the LG [[Crime Report]] - it's a fun article that gives a brief but detailed look into the questionable acts of BDJ (among others)! If not for the next article, then later, perhaps. (maybe after they do something REALLY bad?) --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 18:04, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
		+	::Ooo, GREAT idea, Pheon! I back you up 100% on this. The crime report is (and always has been) one of my favorite articles that I would LOVE to see featured! Love, [[User:-R-\|-R-]] 19:22, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 1 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I developed most of these ideas out of discussion at [[talk:main Page/redesign]]. Please feel welcome to elaborate or suggest further guidelines.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 13:09, 4 January 2007 (CST)		I developed most of these ideas out of discussion at [[talk:main Page/redesign]]. Please feel welcome to elaborate or suggest further guidelines.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 13:09, 4 January 2007 (CST)
		+	:I was looking through that old page, and I'm surprised no one's come up with a "badge" of sorts for already-featured articles. I tried coming up with one on my talk page, but I doubt it's really working and I'd like to know what everyone thinks about having a sort of "certificate" for these articles.--[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 20:27, 30 June 2007 (CDT)

	==Deemontreal==		==Deemontreal==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 30 June 2007
Line 45:		Line 45:
	:As much as I like the fanfic page, and honestly, as much work as I've put into it, I think it would be great to feature the Spin-Offs page. However, I am against this nomination. I feel like the featured article should be a chance for a page to be put on the frontpage that would not otherwise be there, but the LG Spin-Offs is already linked to from the main page. Sorry Misty. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 12:57, 12 May 2007 (CDT)		:As much as I like the fanfic page, and honestly, as much work as I've put into it, I think it would be great to feature the Spin-Offs page. However, I am against this nomination. I feel like the featured article should be a chance for a page to be put on the frontpage that would not otherwise be there, but the LG Spin-Offs is already linked to from the main page. Sorry Misty. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 12:57, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
	:: Good point Zoey, I didn't consider that. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (CDT)		:: Good point Zoey, I didn't consider that. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
		+	:I'd like to Nominate the LG [[Crime Report]] - it's a fun article that gives a brief but detailed look into the questionable acts of BDJ (among others)! If not for the next article, then later, perhaps. (maybe after they do something REALLY bad?) --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 18:04, 30 June 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Dee has been feature nominated for some time now, anybody think it should be the next?  I'm up for HSAO too, but last I heard, that wasn't ready.  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 17:00, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
 :: I think HSAO is a more in depth artcle, but Deemontreal certainly would make a good feature. -[[User:Misty|misty]] 11:53, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
 == Suggestion for next article ==

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 May I nominate [[Mixed Media]]. Maybe not for right away but maybe when a few more shows have gone out. The page obviously needs work, but just an idea. [[User:Coffeeaddict|Coffeeaddict]] 08:45, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
 :I agree.  I think Mixed Media could be a good feature.  The page needs a little work, but you're right, after a few more eps maybe we'll be ready.  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 17:00, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
+::It looks like it's possible that there aren't going to be any more shows, but I LIke featuring it. -[[User:Misty|misty]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
 With all the work  adding fanfic. I thought LG15 Spin-offs would be a good featured article.  It's time to get rid of the list of new girls, since it is no longer relevent. -[[User:Misty|misty]] 10:22, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
 :As much as I like the fanfic page, and honestly, as much work as I've put into it, I think it would be great to feature the Spin-Offs page.  However, I am against this nomination.  I feel like the featured article should be a chance for a page to be put on the frontpage that would not otherwise be there, but the LG Spin-Offs is already linked to from the main page.  Sorry Misty.  --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 12:57, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 12 May 2007
Line 40:		Line 40:

	With all the work adding fanfic. I thought LG15 Spin-offs would be a good featured article. It's time to get rid of the list of new girls, since it is no longer relevent. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 10:22, 11 May 2007 (CDT)		With all the work adding fanfic. I thought LG15 Spin-offs would be a good featured article. It's time to get rid of the list of new girls, since it is no longer relevent. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 10:22, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
		+	:As much as I like the fanfic page, and honestly, as much work as I've put into it, I think it would be great to feature the Spin-Offs page. However, I am against this nomination. I feel like the featured article should be a chance for a page to be put on the frontpage that would not otherwise be there, but the LG Spin-Offs is already linked to from the main page. Sorry Misty. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 12:57, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 11 May 2007
Line 37:		Line 37:
	May I nominate [[Mixed Media]]. Maybe not for right away but maybe when a few more shows have gone out. The page obviously needs work, but just an idea. [[User:Coffeeaddict\|Coffeeaddict]] 08:45, 4 April 2007 (CDT)		May I nominate [[Mixed Media]]. Maybe not for right away but maybe when a few more shows have gone out. The page obviously needs work, but just an idea. [[User:Coffeeaddict\|Coffeeaddict]] 08:45, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
	:I agree. I think Mixed Media could be a good feature. The page needs a little work, but you're right, after a few more eps maybe we'll be ready. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 17:00, 4 April 2007 (CDT)		:I agree. I think Mixed Media could be a good feature. The page needs a little work, but you're right, after a few more eps maybe we'll be ready. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 17:00, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+
		+	With all the work adding fanfic. I thought LG15 Spin-offs would be a good featured article. It's time to get rid of the list of new girls, since it is no longer relevent. -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 10:22, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I developed most of these ideas out of discussion at [[talk:main Page/redesign]].  Please feel welcome to elaborate or suggest further guidelines.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 13:09, 4 January 2007 (CST)
 == Suggestion for next article ==
@@ Line 33: / Line 36: @@
 May I nominate [[Mixed Media]]. Maybe not for right away but maybe when a few more shows have gone out. The page obviously needs work, but just an idea. [[User:Coffeeaddict|Coffeeaddict]] 08:45, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 4 April 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:: Anybody else have thoughts?? --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:18, 12 March 2007 (CDT)		:: Anybody else have thoughts?? --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:18, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	May I nominate [[Mixed Media]]. Maybe not for right away but maybe when a few more shows have gone out. The page obviously needs work, but just an idea. [[User:Coffeeaddict\|Coffeeaddict]] 08:45, 4 April 2007 (CDT)