Talk:1943 abduction - Revision history

69.131.23.208 at 13:36, 30 August 2009

2009-08-30T13:36:51Z

69.131.23.208: /* My Two Cents */

2009-08-30T13:36:19Z

‎My Two Cents

JaredThaJa at 10:07, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T10:07:30Z

JaredThaJa at 10:06, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T10:06:36Z

69.131.23.208 at 09:56, 29 August 2009

2009-08-29T09:56:58Z

Skeeta at 06:54, 29 November 2006

2006-11-29T06:54:16Z

208.144.234.2 at 20:28, 23 October 2006

2006-10-23T20:28:51Z

JayHenry at 18:18, 23 October 2006

2006-10-23T18:18:35Z

Brucker: /* meta-discussion and sketchy details */

2006-10-23T18:02:32Z

‎meta-discussion and sketchy details

JayHenry: /* meta-discussion and sketchy details */

2006-10-20T18:31:19Z

‎meta-discussion and sketchy details

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 30 August 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.		:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.
		+
		+	==My Two Cents==
		+
		+	This Specific event is made up for the story, but in the story I don't think Daniel was lying, it lacked details cause this was early on and Daniel didn't know what to make of it.
		+
		+	In the Real World however Crowley is suspected to have been a Pedophile Serial Killer.-JaredThaJa

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 30 August 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.		:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.
−
−	~~==My Two Cents==~~
−
−	~~This Specific event is made up for the story, but in the story I don't think Daniel was lying, it lacked details cause this was early on and Daniel didn't know what to make of it.~~
−
−	~~In the Real World however Crowley is suspected to have been a Pedophile Serial Killer.-JaredThaJa~~

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 :I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.
 This Specific event is made up for the story, but in the story I don't think Daniel was lying, it lacked details cause this was early on and Daniel didn't know what to make of it.
-In the Real World however Crowley is suspected to have been a Pedophile Serial Killer.
+In the Real World however Crowley is suspected to have been a Pedophile Serial Killer.-JaredThaJa

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.
 This Specific event is made up for the story, but in the story I don't think Daniel was lying, it lacked details cause this was early on and Daniel didn't know what to make of it.
 In the Real World however Crowley is suspected to have been a Pedophile Serial Killer.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:56, 29 August 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.		:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.
		+
		+	This Specific event is made up for the story, but in the story I don't think Daniel was lying, it lacked details cause this was early on and Daniel didn't know what to make of it.
		+
		+	In the Real World however Crowley is suspected to have been a Pedophile Serial Killer.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 29 November 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	::Hmm, you're right, that clue does seem to come out of sequence, doesn't it. I keep thinking whenever I read people theorizing that Bree is actually setting up a trap for Daniel that they've just seen that movie from the 1980's too many times (if you don't know the movie I'm talking about, forget it; that's a huge spoiler) and it doesn't seem likely to me. Now I've got to wonder. All of this is either going to turn out to be really stupid or really brilliant in the end when all the pieces come together.--[[User:208.144.234.2\|208.144.234.2]] 13:28, 23 October 2006 (PDT)		::Hmm, you're right, that clue does seem to come out of sequence, doesn't it. I keep thinking whenever I read people theorizing that Bree is actually setting up a trap for Daniel that they've just seen that movie from the 1980's too many times (if you don't know the movie I'm talking about, forget it; that's a huge spoiler) and it doesn't seem likely to me. Now I've got to wonder. All of this is either going to turn out to be really stupid or really brilliant in the end when all the pieces come together.--[[User:208.144.234.2\|208.144.234.2]] 13:28, 23 October 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	:I agree with JayHenry, I don't think The idea was that bree was doing it, i think it was an out-of-the-storyline thing that the creators did as a hint.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 23 October 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:Great points, Brucker. Do you ever post at [[The Children of Anchor Cove\|the cove]]? Lots of this sort of analysis. In the Breeniverse, Bree did the Cookie Monster video before she was even told about the ceremony. Doesn't seem likely that they were planting a trap for Daniel that early, or that she would have gone along with it. I think 10-12-06 is an example of the creators trying to be too clever.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:18, 23 October 2006 (PDT)		:Great points, Brucker. Do you ever post at [[The Children of Anchor Cove\|the cove]]? Lots of this sort of analysis. In the Breeniverse, Bree did the Cookie Monster video before she was even told about the ceremony. Doesn't seem likely that they were planting a trap for Daniel that early, or that she would have gone along with it. I think 10-12-06 is an example of the creators trying to be too clever.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:18, 23 October 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	::Hmm, you're right, that clue does seem to come out of sequence, doesn't it. I keep thinking whenever I read people theorizing that Bree is actually setting up a trap for Daniel that they've just seen that movie from the 1980's too many times (if you don't know the movie I'm talking about, forget it; that's a huge spoiler) and it doesn't seem likely to me. Now I've got to wonder. All of this is either going to turn out to be really stupid or really brilliant in the end when all the pieces come together.--[[User:208.144.234.2\|208.144.234.2]] 13:28, 23 October 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 23 October 2006
Line 20:		Line 20:

	So I think it once again brings a lot of things into question. I forgot to mention it above, apparently, but in many of the videos, with all this excess of editing, there are times when the lighting in the room seems to show that the video we are watching is edited out of order (I'm having a hard time finding a blatant example, but I'm pretty sure there was one). Is that bad editing, or a clue?--[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 11:02, 23 October 2006 (PDT)		So I think it once again brings a lot of things into question. I forgot to mention it above, apparently, but in many of the videos, with all this excess of editing, there are times when the lighting in the room seems to show that the video we are watching is edited out of order (I'm having a hard time finding a blatant example, but I'm pretty sure there was one). Is that bad editing, or a clue?--[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 11:02, 23 October 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	:Great points, Brucker. Do you ever post at [[The Children of Anchor Cove\|the cove]]? Lots of this sort of analysis. In the Breeniverse, Bree did the Cookie Monster video before she was even told about the ceremony. Doesn't seem likely that they were planting a trap for Daniel that early, or that she would have gone along with it. I think 10-12-06 is an example of the creators trying to be too clever.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:18, 23 October 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 23 October 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:Really interesting thoughts Brucker. I think the abduction should definitely be included in the Breeniverse timeline. My guess is that this particular bit of information, about Crowley, was created for the story. Not only can people find no evidence of an abduction, nobody has even been able to find evidence that Crowley spent time in Arizona.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:31, 20 October 2006 (PDT)		:Really interesting thoughts Brucker. I think the abduction should definitely be included in the Breeniverse timeline. My guess is that this particular bit of information, about Crowley, was created for the story. Not only can people find no evidence of an abduction, nobody has even been able to find evidence that Crowley spent time in Arizona.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:31, 20 October 2006 (PDT)
		+
		+	Okay, let me add more to this, because the revelations of the weekend highlight a little more of this issue, I believe. In [[Bree The Cookie Monster]], when Purple Monkey shows the numbers, as has been noted, this is the most clear and blatant clue in the whole series. The blatantness of the clue always seemed to me to be a case of sloppiness on the part of the creators, since it seems from what I read in the CassieIsWatching stuff, there are a lot of people who can dig out clues that are far more subtle, so why be so blatant about it?
		+
		+	Now it would seem that it was ''Bree'' who was being blatant. She put the clue in the video in such an obvious fashion that nobody could miss it, because she was planting a red herring for Daniel. The clumsiness of the clue was, in a sense, a part of the overall plotline.
		+
		+	So I think it once again brings a lot of things into question. I forgot to mention it above, apparently, but in many of the videos, with all this excess of editing, there are times when the lighting in the room seems to show that the video we are watching is edited out of order (I'm having a hard time finding a blatant example, but I'm pretty sure there was one). Is that bad editing, or a clue?--[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 11:02, 23 October 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 20 October 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	The abuduction has me baffled. I have looked for information and there are some links between Crowley and AZ but nothing about an abduction...........I think its is probably importand and relevant given that one of Lucys locations is in AZ- [[User:modelmotion\|modelmotion]]		The abuduction has me baffled. I have looked for information and there are some links between Crowley and AZ but nothing about an abduction...........I think its is probably importand and relevant given that one of Lucys locations is in AZ- [[User:modelmotion\|modelmotion]]
		+
		+	:Really interesting thoughts Brucker. I think the abduction should definitely be included in the Breeniverse timeline. My guess is that this particular bit of information, about Crowley, was created for the story. Not only can people find no evidence of an abduction, nobody has even been able to find evidence that Crowley spent time in Arizona.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:31, 20 October 2006 (PDT)