Talk:Baphomet - Revision history

Jonpro: fixing link from forever ago... forgive me, jay

2008-05-25T21:23:32Z

fixing link from forever ago... forgive me, jay

2006-12-10T03:46:34Z

‎Better screen capture

2006-12-10T02:13:24Z

Better screen capture

2006-12-09T00:04:41Z

2006-12-08T23:55:27Z

2006-12-08T21:56:54Z

2006-12-08T21:39:42Z

2006-12-08T20:19:42Z

2006-12-08T20:16:51Z

2006-12-08T20:14:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 25 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Actually, this page is the rare page that I'd say exists for a good reason. Before Bree had a picture of Crowley on the wall, she had a picture of what most fans believe was a Baphomet. It can be seen in the video [[Danielbeast]]. I'm not sure that the item deserves its own page, but that's mostly because I don't know the relation between Baphomet and other items in the LGpedia.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:05, 8 December 2006 (CST)	+	Actually, this page is the rare page that I'd say exists for a good reason. Before Bree had a picture of Crowley on the wall, she had a picture of what most fans believe was a Baphomet. It can be seen in the video [[The Danielbeast]]. I'm not sure that the item deserves its own page, but that's mostly because I don't know the relation between Baphomet and other items in the LGpedia.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:05, 8 December 2006 (CST)

	Well, I just watched that video, did a screen capture, and zoomed in. I've uploaded the result here: [[Image:beastphoto.jpg]]		Well, I just watched that video, did a screen capture, and zoomed in. I've uploaded the result here: [[Image:beastphoto.jpg]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 10 December 2006
Line 43:		Line 43:
	[[Image:Baphomet_pic2_zoom.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Option 2]]		[[Image:Baphomet_pic2_zoom.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Option 2]]
	[[Image:Baphomet?_pic3_zoomzoom.JPG\|thumb\|400px\|Option 3]]		[[Image:Baphomet?_pic3_zoomzoom.JPG\|thumb\|400px\|Option 3]]
		+
		+	Excellent...and I assume very correct --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 21:46, 9 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 10 December 2006
Line 36:		Line 36:
	Hey Treefunk,<br>		Hey Treefunk,<br>
	I think we were both working on it at once because at one time it said there was an editing conflict. I copied the new content you'd written and incorporated it into the version that had the organization I put in. If you don't like it, just revert to your old version, no worries. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:09, 8 December 2006 (CST)		I think we were both working on it at once because at one time it said there was an editing conflict. I copied the new content you'd written and incorporated it into the version that had the organization I put in. If you don't like it, just revert to your old version, no worries. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:09, 8 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	== Better screen capture ==
		+
		+	I wasn't too satisfied with the screen cap we had, so I got a couple of others. I like the second one best, I think. I can clearly see a family picture here, complete with a mom, dad, and little child. What does everyone else think?
		+	[[Image:Baphomet?_pic1.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Option 1]]
		+	[[Image:Baphomet_pic2_zoom.jpg\|thumb\|300px\|Option 2]]
		+	[[Image:Baphomet?_pic3_zoomzoom.JPG\|thumb\|400px\|Option 3]]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ::::That's just a modern artist's rendition of Baphomet though. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 17:55, 8 December 2006 (CST)
 =Editing conflict=
 Hey Treefunk,<br>
 I think we were both working on it at once because at one time it said there was an editing conflict.  I copied the new content you'd written and incorporated it into the version that had the organization I put in.  If you don't like it, just revert to your old version, no worries. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 14:09, 8 December 2006 (CST)

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 :::Is this the image that was originally linked to Bree's picture?  The position of Baphomet here is very similar to the form in our blurry screen capture.  http://www.crossroads.wild.net.au/or3.htm  --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 15:56, 8 December 2006 (CST)
 =Editing conflict=
 Hey Treefunk,<br>
 I think we were both working on it at once because at one time it said there was an editing conflict.  I copied the new content you'd written and incorporated it into the version that had the organization I put in.  If you don't like it, just revert to your old version, no worries. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 14:09, 8 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 8 December 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:Actually, I'd like to see this article have one more thing: some kind of explanation as to why some fans proposed the idea that it was Baphomet. They must have had some kind of rationale right? Unfortunately I have no idea how any of that happened... it was before I caught on. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:16, 8 December 2006 (CST)		:Actually, I'd like to see this article have one more thing: some kind of explanation as to why some fans proposed the idea that it was Baphomet. They must have had some kind of rationale right? Unfortunately I have no idea how any of that happened... it was before I caught on. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:16, 8 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	Well, I looked in the LG15 forums and saw where people were talking about it...and they offered no rationale. They were like "Oh yeah...that's definitely Baphomet there" with no reasoning behind it. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:19, 8 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 8 December 2006
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Yes, I agree. I removed the deletion template since I'm originally the one that put it there. I also editted a bit. I'm totally backing off on the face idea. My girlfriend pointed out to me the two figures. But, it's definitely no baphomet. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:14, 8 December 2006 (CST)		Yes, I agree. I removed the deletion template since I'm originally the one that put it there. I also editted a bit. I'm totally backing off on the face idea. My girlfriend pointed out to me the two figures. But, it's definitely no baphomet. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:14, 8 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	:Actually, I'd like to see this article have one more thing: some kind of explanation as to why some fans proposed the idea that it was Baphomet. They must have had some kind of rationale right? Unfortunately I have no idea how any of that happened... it was before I caught on. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:16, 8 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 8 December 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:Yep, looks like it's ok to keep it. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:11, 8 December 2006 (CST)		:Yep, looks like it's ok to keep it. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 14:11, 8 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	Yes, I agree. I removed the deletion template since I'm originally the one that put it there. I also editted a bit. I'm totally backing off on the face idea. My girlfriend pointed out to me the two figures. But, it's definitely no baphomet. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 14:14, 8 December 2006 (CST)