Talk:Beach Bum - Revision history

Jonpro at 22:34, 11 March 2007

2007-03-11T22:34:37Z

2007-03-11T22:29:53Z

‎Notes Section

2007-03-10T08:01:24Z

‎Notes Section

2007-03-10T05:33:55Z

‎Notes Section

2007-03-09T12:42:25Z

‎Notes Section

2007-03-09T06:03:21Z

‎Notes Section

2007-03-09T05:05:41Z

‎Notes Section: claiming my own comment

2007-03-09T03:45:58Z

‎Notes Section

2007-03-09T03:34:50Z

2007-03-09T03:01:55Z

‎Notes Section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 11 March 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I agree with the notes, but about something different. The picture in the corner looks all messed up, i think it may need replacing? I just dont know how.		I agree with the notes, but about something different. The picture in the corner looks all messed up, i think it may need replacing? I just dont know how.
		+
		+	:I don't see anything wrong with the picture. What exactly looks messed up about it?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 17:34, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 11 March 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Agree fair enough to have them in the discussion - that way they are still there without coming under notes. Sounds good to me...		Agree fair enough to have them in the discussion - that way they are still there without coming under notes. Sounds good to me...
		+
		+	I agree with the notes, but about something different. The picture in the corner looks all messed up, i think it may need replacing? I just dont know how.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 10 March 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	::Okay, something bad DID happen (apparently, Jonas and Bree can't break in anywhere without the Beast) -- but still . . . those notes were too speculative to BE notes. --[[User:Phoenician\|Phoenician]], 10:33 PM, 9 March 2007 (MT)		::Okay, something bad DID happen (apparently, Jonas and Bree can't break in anywhere without the Beast) -- but still . . . those notes were too speculative to BE notes. --[[User:Phoenician\|Phoenician]], 10:33 PM, 9 March 2007 (MT)
		+
		+	Agree fair enough to have them in the discussion - that way they are still there without coming under notes. Sounds good to me...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 10 March 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Personally I like reading the speculative notes, I find them interesting. I'd be for keeping them, but I can see how they could become just what one fan thinks instead of many, which has a bit more weight.		Personally I like reading the speculative notes, I find them interesting. I'd be for keeping them, but I can see how they could become just what one fan thinks instead of many, which has a bit more weight.
	:I like the speculation, but it's place is not in the notes. I'd like to see it in the discussion, rather than on the article [[User:Anto687\|Anto]] 06:42, 9 March 2007 (CST)		:I like the speculation, but it's place is not in the notes. I'd like to see it in the discussion, rather than on the article [[User:Anto687\|Anto]] 06:42, 9 March 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::Okay, something bad DID happen (apparently, Jonas and Bree can't break in anywhere without the Beast) -- but still . . . those notes were too speculative to BE notes. --[[User:Phoenician\|Phoenician]], 10:33 PM, 9 March 2007 (MT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 9 March 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Personally I like reading the speculative notes, I find them interesting. I'd be for keeping them, but I can see how they could become just what one fan thinks instead of many, which has a bit more weight.		Personally I like reading the speculative notes, I find them interesting. I'd be for keeping them, but I can see how they could become just what one fan thinks instead of many, which has a bit more weight.
		+	:I like the speculation, but it's place is not in the notes. I'd like to see it in the discussion, rather than on the article [[User:Anto687\|Anto]] 06:42, 9 March 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 9 March 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::I agree. The notes have gotten too speculative. I think the notes should explain references, goofs, past and present plot tie-ins, etc. but stuff like "Possibly there is potential plot foreshadowing" should really stick to forum threads. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:34, 8 March 2007 (CST)		::I agree. The notes have gotten too speculative. I think the notes should explain references, goofs, past and present plot tie-ins, etc. but stuff like "Possibly there is potential plot foreshadowing" should really stick to forum threads. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:34, 8 March 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	Personally I like reading the speculative notes, I find them interesting. I'd be for keeping them, but I can see how they could become just what one fan thinks instead of many, which has a bit more weight.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :Leave speculation in the forums, if you please (again, I'm not changing anything YET).
-:What does everyone else say? -- Phoenician, 8 March 2007
+:What does everyone else say? --[[User:Phoenician|Phoenician]], 8 March 2007
 ::I agree.  The notes have gotten too speculative.  I think the notes should explain references, goofs, past and present plot tie-ins, etc. but stuff like "Possibly there is potential plot foreshadowing" should really stick to forum threads. --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 21:34, 8 March 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 9 March 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:What does everyone else say?		:What does everyone else say?
		+
		+	::I agree. The notes have gotten too speculative. I think the notes should explain references, goofs, past and present plot tie-ins, etc. but stuff like "Possibly there is potential plot foreshadowing" should really stick to forum threads. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 21:34, 8 March 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Okay, I'm not going to change anything yet, but seriously, the Notes Section is getting just a TAD TOO speculative.  IMO, Notes are factual, or pretty darn close to it.
-The people plugging in these notes for this particular video are reading perhaps a little too much into them without sufficient evidence.
+:The people plugging in these notes for this particular video are reading perhaps a little too much into them without sufficient evidence.
-If there IS anything "foreshadowing" in this Vlog, let the next video take place so we can confirm.
+:If there IS anything "foreshadowing" in this Vlog, let the next video take place so we can confirm.
-Leave speculation in the forums, if you please (again, I'm not changing anything YET).
+:Leave speculation in the forums, if you please (again, I'm not changing anything YET).
-What does everyone else say?
+:What does everyone else say?