Talk:Ceremony baby - Revision history

Zoey: Talk:Ceremony Baby moved to Talk:Ceremony baby

2007-10-21T18:59:53Z

Talk:Ceremony Baby moved to Talk:Ceremony baby

Milowent: when a crazy lgpedia page becomes legitimate plot fodder

2007-10-09T17:09:23Z

when a crazy lgpedia page becomes legitimate plot fodder

-R-: /* Second blog? */

2007-08-01T21:37:22Z

‎Second blog?

-R-: Second blog?

2007-08-01T21:30:35Z

Second blog?

208.63.168.69 at 00:38, 11 May 2007

2007-05-11T00:38:58Z

SilverBULLETx3 at 21:44, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T21:44:57Z

Platypusrex256 at 17:01, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T17:01:59Z

Misty at 07:16, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T07:16:29Z

Jonpro at 06:08, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T06:08:36Z

Zoey at 05:34, 10 May 2007

2007-05-10T05:34:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 9 October 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	"You know, she helps me out with the... bad times. [image of crying baby pops up]" o.0... {{User:-R-/signature\|4:31 PM}}		"You know, she helps me out with the... bad times. [image of crying baby pops up]" o.0... {{User:-R-/signature\|4:31 PM}}
		+
		+	== The LGPedia knows all ==
		+
		+	With Jonas' mention in [[Batting Practice]] today ("So, if you ask me to go find or rescue some baby") there seems to be no question that the Ceremony Baby theory hatched back in May has now come to pass. We may have to de-humorize this page, with perhaps a footnote on the original speculation. --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 12:09, 9 October 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Second blog? ==
-Uh oh, in the first blog...
+"You know, she helps me out with the... bad times. [image of crying baby pops up]" o.0... {{User:-R-/signature|4:31 PM}}
 "You know, she helps me out with the... bad times. [image of crying baby pops up]"
 o.0... {{User:-R-/signature|4:31 PM}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 1 August 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	i nominate this page to be kept. its funny and it made me laugh. a little. if you don't like the article you can simply not look at it. -- [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] may 10 2007		i nominate this page to be kept. its funny and it made me laugh. a little. if you don't like the article you can simply not look at it. -- [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] may 10 2007
	::::::I added the "Humor" template to this page. [[User:SilverBULLETx3\|silverX3]] 16:44, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::::::I added the "Humor" template to this page. [[User:SilverBULLETx3\|silverX3]] 16:44, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	== Second blog? ==
		+
		+	Uh oh, in the first blog...
		+	"You know, she helps me out with the... bad times. [image of crying baby pops up]"
		+	o.0... {{User:-R-/signature\|4:31 PM}}

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
 ::::: I'd bet that whatever that is in the background it wasn't an accident.  I'm sure it will have meaning at some point, but I think we should leave it alot mor wide open.  the idea of a ceremony baby is only one of many possible creative outcome people can think up, so why lock it into that interpretation. why don't we move this to. "Who is that baby?" -[[User:Misty|misty]] 02:16, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
 i nominate this page to be kept.  its funny and it made me laugh.  a little.  if you don't like the article you can simply not look at it. -- [[user:platypusrex256|platypus]] may 10 2007
 ::::::I added the "Humor" template to this page. [[User:SilverBULLETx3|silverX3]] 16:44, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 10 May 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	i nominate this page to be kept. its funny and it made me laugh. a little. if you don't like the article you can simply not look at it. -- [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] may 10 2007		i nominate this page to be kept. its funny and it made me laugh. a little. if you don't like the article you can simply not look at it. -- [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] may 10 2007
		+	::::::I added the "Humor" template to this page. [[User:SilverBULLETx3\|silverX3]] 16:44, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:59, 21 October 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 10 May 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::::: I'd bet that whatever that is in the background it wasn't an accident. I'm sure it will have meaning at some point, but I think we should leave it alot mor wide open. the idea of a ceremony baby is only one of many possible creative outcome people can think up, so why lock it into that interpretation. why don't we move this to. "Who is that baby?" -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 02:16, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::::: I'd bet that whatever that is in the background it wasn't an accident. I'm sure it will have meaning at some point, but I think we should leave it alot mor wide open. the idea of a ceremony baby is only one of many possible creative outcome people can think up, so why lock it into that interpretation. why don't we move this to. "Who is that baby?" -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 02:16, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	i nominate this page to be kept. its funny and it made me laugh. a little. if you don't like the article you can simply not look at it. -- [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] may 10 2007

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 10 May 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
		+	::::: I'd bet that whatever that is in the background it wasn't an accident. I'm sure it will have meaning at some point, but I think we should leave it alot mor wide open. the idea of a ceremony baby is only one of many possible creative outcome people can think up, so why lock it into that interpretation. why don't we move this to. "Who is that baby?" -[[User:Misty\|misty]] 02:16, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:08, 10 May 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A		::Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A
	:::Lol, I agree. This does seem REALLY farfetched. However, I'm with Milo in that we should at least wait a bit. See what happens. I mean, the first time we saw a man in a black suit, would we have KNOWN that it was important? Not necessarily. Then... enter [[Watcher]]s. So yeah, personally I say wait for a little bit. We can always delete later if this doesn't pan out. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 00:34, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:::Lol, I agree. This does seem REALLY farfetched. However, I'm with Milo in that we should at least wait a bit. See what happens. I mean, the first time we saw a man in a black suit, would we have KNOWN that it was important? Not necessarily. Then... enter [[Watcher]]s. So yeah, personally I say wait for a little bit. We can always delete later if this doesn't pan out. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 00:34, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 10 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:let's not delete this immediately! let's wait for some input on whether this speculation pans out! --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 00:24, 10 May 2007 (CDT)		:let's not delete this immediately! let's wait for some input on whether this speculation pans out! --[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 00:24, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
	::Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A		::Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A
		+	:::Lol, I agree. This does seem REALLY farfetched. However, I'm with Milo in that we should at least wait a bit. See what happens. I mean, the first time we saw a man in a black suit, would we have KNOWN that it was important? Not necessarily. Then... enter [[Watcher]]s. So yeah, personally I say wait for a little bit. We can always delete later if this doesn't pan out. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 00:34, 10 May 2007 (CDT)