Talk:Cheats-for-Porn Scandal - Revision history

JayHenry at 13:58, 15 March 2007

2007-03-15T13:58:03Z

71.224.243.78 at 13:38, 15 March 2007

2007-03-15T13:38:59Z

Michiev at 06:24, 15 March 2007

2007-03-15T06:24:45Z

OwenIsCool: on deletion

2007-03-15T06:20:09Z

on deletion

New page

==speedy deletion?==
I'm not opposed to eventually having an article that summarizes the events on this week, but I think it's too soon to document them on the wiki. My rationale is that users reading the wiki tend to validate what they read as if it were all "official". We don't have any more "official" information than the forum does, so I think until things cool down, we should refrain from writing up an article. Starting one now would just invite criticism and vandalism.<br>
When the time comes for said article, I also think it should be named differently. In the meantime, I think this article is a good candidate for speedy deletion, but I wanted to leave it out there for a minute in case anyone wanted to add something to that.<br>
[[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 01:20, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 15 March 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I think it should be deleted until more information comes forward about it as well. --[[User:Michiev\|Michiev]]		I think it should be deleted until more information comes forward about it as well. --[[User:Michiev\|Michiev]]
		+
		+	I agree with OIC and Michiev. We really need to wait until more information is out there so that we're sure that we're being responsible in our coverage of this. Also, we don't want the LGPedia to turn into the sort of over-heated, rabid mess the forum is in. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 08:58, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 15 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	When the time comes for said article, I also think it should be named differently. In the meantime, I think this article is a good candidate for speedy deletion, but I wanted to leave it out there for a minute in case anyone wanted to add something to that.<br>		When the time comes for said article, I also think it should be named differently. In the meantime, I think this article is a good candidate for speedy deletion, but I wanted to leave it out there for a minute in case anyone wanted to add something to that.<br>
	[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 01:20, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 01:20, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	I think it should be deleted until more information comes forward about it as well. --[[User:Michiev\|Michiev]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 When the time comes for said article, I also think it should be named differently.  In the meantime, I think this article is a good candidate for speedy deletion, but I wanted to leave it out there for a minute in case anyone wanted to add something to that.<br>
 [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 01:20, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
 I think it should be deleted until more information comes forward about it as well. --[[User:Michiev|Michiev]]