Talk:GuillotineCalamity - Revision history

Shiori at 17:05, 7 April 2009

2009-04-07T17:05:31Z

LordGreystoke422 at 18:27, 8 August 2008

2008-08-08T18:27:45Z

Zoey: removed feature nod, the consensus appears to be no.

2007-05-11T01:14:29Z

removed feature nod, the consensus appears to be no.

Crowcity at 00:15, 5 February 2007

2007-02-05T00:15:08Z

OwenIsCool at 17:39, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T17:39:22Z

LordGreystoke422: DANG AUTO LOG OUTS!

2007-02-03T06:37:10Z

DANG AUTO LOG OUTS!

70.196.12.34 at 06:35, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T06:35:08Z

HyeMew at 06:04, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T06:04:25Z

LordGreystoke422 at 05:45, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T05:45:31Z

24.57.4.38 at 05:24, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T05:24:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 7 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{community content}}
	veritas means truth in latin. it's harvard's motto.--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 18:24, 23 January 2007 (CST)		veritas means truth in latin. it's harvard's motto.--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 18:24, 23 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 8 August 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I think it <i>is</i> very debateable whether fan fiction should be featured, but am obviously for it. The fan fiction og LG15 is a relevant piece of The Breeniverse, in my eyes. I mean, without cassieiswatching, OpAphid may be completely different, or perhaps non-existant! And opAphid has been accepted as official LG canon, now as we see fully intergrated into the direct LG storyline. Yes, fan fiction, even that of an unprofessional type (no offense) deserves at least some recognition. --[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]		I think it <i>is</i> very debateable whether fan fiction should be featured, but am obviously for it. The fan fiction og LG15 is a relevant piece of The Breeniverse, in my eyes. I mean, without cassieiswatching, OpAphid may be completely different, or perhaps non-existant! And opAphid has been accepted as official LG canon, now as we see fully intergrated into the direct LG storyline. Yes, fan fiction, even that of an unprofessional type (no offense) deserves at least some recognition. --[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]
		+
		+	These pages are neat and complete and a complex story..Which should have been tier 4 or 5 yet was marked for deletion along with its 2 sister series Opscorn and theladylazarus...named tier 1..these were prime examples of what was wrong with the tier system. Hence I am removing the deletion tag.--[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 13:27, 8 August 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 11 May 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	So...codes into truth? [[User:Crowcity]]		So...codes into truth? [[User:Crowcity]]

−	~~{{feature nomination}}~~
	Ok, so I nominate GC's page because I think it has a fair amount of clarity, cleanliness and <i>is</i> related to LG15, as some of her videos are in response to LG15 videos, and the storyline revolves around a community, just like Bree's. And Like LL's page, let's not try to argue. This is a discussion, not a competitive debate. .--[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]		Ok, so I nominate GC's page because I think it has a fair amount of clarity, cleanliness and <i>is</i> related to LG15, as some of her videos are in response to LG15 videos, and the storyline revolves around a community, just like Bree's. And Like LL's page, let's not try to argue. This is a discussion, not a competitive debate. .--[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 5 February 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:::::This discussion over whether fanfic should or should not be included needs to be moved to [[LGPedia talk:Featured articles]]. When JayHenry first came up with that, he set forth some guidelines that are included in that page, and everyone seemed to be ok with them. If that's not the case anymore, then it needs to be discussed, but not here. This page is for discussion of this article's merit, not our FA guidelines. As they stand, we're not against featuring fanfic, but the article should not be self-promoting. It's also ok to agree to feature an article ''eventually'' after everyone has had a chance to revise it. So... before this turns into another fiasco... if you have anything further to say about our FA ''guidelines'', please post your concern on [[LGPedia talk:Featured articles]]. If you're merely against featuring GC, you've made your point, and it's been acknowledged. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 11:39, 3 February 2007 (CST)		:::::This discussion over whether fanfic should or should not be included needs to be moved to [[LGPedia talk:Featured articles]]. When JayHenry first came up with that, he set forth some guidelines that are included in that page, and everyone seemed to be ok with them. If that's not the case anymore, then it needs to be discussed, but not here. This page is for discussion of this article's merit, not our FA guidelines. As they stand, we're not against featuring fanfic, but the article should not be self-promoting. It's also ok to agree to feature an article ''eventually'' after everyone has had a chance to revise it. So... before this turns into another fiasco... if you have anything further to say about our FA ''guidelines'', please post your concern on [[LGPedia talk:Featured articles]]. If you're merely against featuring GC, you've made your point, and it's been acknowledged. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 11:39, 3 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	I think it <i>is</i> very debateable whether fan fiction should be featured, but am obviously for it. The fan fiction og LG15 is a relevant piece of The Breeniverse, in my eyes. I mean, without cassieiswatching, OpAphid may be completely different, or perhaps non-existant! And opAphid has been accepted as official LG canon, now as we see fully intergrated into the direct LG storyline. Yes, fan fiction, even that of an unprofessional type (no offense) deserves at least some recognition. --[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 3 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::Hah..I was just kidding I am actually for featuring it.. Actually..despite how problematic it is I think we need to make the effort to support some Fan SpinOffs prominently. We just need to check heavily to make sure that it doesn't get people totally confused with the LG15 storyline AND the CassieisWatching storyline as being canon for either. Maybe do a series of Fan Features. One for serious storyline, one for parody, one for straight fan commentary maybe? We could pick a few choices for each category and vote on which we use and then focus on prepping the article to get it ready for prime time. This name associated with this post I say should not be included... I've already basked in the glory of being mentioned by the creators in a letter that is posted RIGHT on the Fan Fiction page..so...that's that with that. Also I am against itscassie because of the cassie confusion. I'd say GC, Immant, and HSAO for serious. LonesomeOct, Apotheosis, and ItsKassie for parody...who the hell knows about other characters categories..we can figure some out. Also... let me say.. So much for not being a competetive debate. Actually, I don't think a true discussion is possible with out some competetive debate...otherwise its just mindless positions..kinda like the US congress. I just have to say one more thing... Don't think of an elephant.. and you thought of? An elephant of course..unless you don't understand the meaning of the word... It's inherent that if you tell someone NOT to do something..think something.. You have JUST put thoughts of that something in that person's mind where as before saying it the person may not have been thinking of it at all. Ok..Soapbox off!.		::::Hah..I was just kidding I am actually for featuring it.. Actually..despite how problematic it is I think we need to make the effort to support some Fan SpinOffs prominently. We just need to check heavily to make sure that it doesn't get people totally confused with the LG15 storyline AND the CassieisWatching storyline as being canon for either. Maybe do a series of Fan Features. One for serious storyline, one for parody, one for straight fan commentary maybe? We could pick a few choices for each category and vote on which we use and then focus on prepping the article to get it ready for prime time. This name associated with this post I say should not be included... I've already basked in the glory of being mentioned by the creators in a letter that is posted RIGHT on the Fan Fiction page..so...that's that with that. Also I am against itscassie because of the cassie confusion. I'd say GC, Immant, and HSAO for serious. LonesomeOct, Apotheosis, and ItsKassie for parody...who the hell knows about other characters categories..we can figure some out. Also... let me say.. So much for not being a competetive debate. Actually, I don't think a true discussion is possible with out some competetive debate...otherwise its just mindless positions..kinda like the US congress. I just have to say one more thing... Don't think of an elephant.. and you thought of? An elephant of course..unless you don't understand the meaning of the word... It's inherent that if you tell someone NOT to do something..think something.. You have JUST put thoughts of that something in that person's mind where as before saying it the person may not have been thinking of it at all. Ok..Soapbox off!.
	How can you discuss something without presenting an argument when that is simply a position on a topic. Ok..Done..and here I was just trying to be a little bad and have fun.. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 00:37, 3 February 2007 (CST)		How can you discuss something without presenting an argument when that is simply a position on a topic. Ok..Done..and here I was just trying to be a little bad and have fun.. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 00:37, 3 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::::This discussion over whether fanfic should or should not be included needs to be moved to [[LGPedia talk:Featured articles]]. When JayHenry first came up with that, he set forth some guidelines that are included in that page, and everyone seemed to be ok with them. If that's not the case anymore, then it needs to be discussed, but not here. This page is for discussion of this article's merit, not our FA guidelines. As they stand, we're not against featuring fanfic, but the article should not be self-promoting. It's also ok to agree to feature an article ''eventually'' after everyone has had a chance to revise it. So... before this turns into another fiasco... if you have anything further to say about our FA ''guidelines'', please post your concern on [[LGPedia talk:Featured articles]]. If you're merely against featuring GC, you've made your point, and it's been acknowledged. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 11:39, 3 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 3 February 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::::Hah..I was just kidding I am actually for featuring it.. Actually..despite how problematic it is I think we need to make the effort to support some Fan SpinOffs prominently. We just need to check heavily to make sure that it doesn't get people totally confused with the LG15 storyline AND the CassieisWatching storyline as being canon for either. Maybe do a series of Fan Features. One for serious storyline, one for parody, one for straight fan commentary maybe? We could pick a few choices for each category and vote on which we use and then focus on prepping the article to get it ready for prime time. This name associated with this post I say should not be included... I've already basked in the glory of being mentioned by the creators in a letter that is posted RIGHT on the Fan Fiction page..so...that's that with that. Also I am against itscassie because of the cassie confusion. I'd say GC, Immant, and HSAO for serious. LonesomeOct, Apotheosis, and ItsKassie for parody...who the hell knows about other characters categories..we can figure some out. Also... let me say.. So much for not being a competetive debate. Actually, I don't think a true discussion is possible with out some competetive debate...otherwise its just mindless positions..kinda like the US congress. I just have to say one more thing... Don't think of an elephant.. and you thought of? An elephant of course..unless you don't understand the meaning of the word... It's inherent that if you tell someone NOT to do something..think something.. You have JUST put thoughts of that something in that person's mind where as before saying it the person may not have been thinking of it at all. Ok..Soapbox off!.		::::Hah..I was just kidding I am actually for featuring it.. Actually..despite how problematic it is I think we need to make the effort to support some Fan SpinOffs prominently. We just need to check heavily to make sure that it doesn't get people totally confused with the LG15 storyline AND the CassieisWatching storyline as being canon for either. Maybe do a series of Fan Features. One for serious storyline, one for parody, one for straight fan commentary maybe? We could pick a few choices for each category and vote on which we use and then focus on prepping the article to get it ready for prime time. This name associated with this post I say should not be included... I've already basked in the glory of being mentioned by the creators in a letter that is posted RIGHT on the Fan Fiction page..so...that's that with that. Also I am against itscassie because of the cassie confusion. I'd say GC, Immant, and HSAO for serious. LonesomeOct, Apotheosis, and ItsKassie for parody...who the hell knows about other characters categories..we can figure some out. Also... let me say.. So much for not being a competetive debate. Actually, I don't think a true discussion is possible with out some competetive debate...otherwise its just mindless positions..kinda like the US congress. I just have to say one more thing... Don't think of an elephant.. and you thought of? An elephant of course..unless you don't understand the meaning of the word... It's inherent that if you tell someone NOT to do something..think something.. You have JUST put thoughts of that something in that person's mind where as before saying it the person may not have been thinking of it at all. Ok..Soapbox off!.
−	How can you discuss something without presenting an argument when that is simply a position on a topic. Ok..Done..and here I was just trying to be a little bad and have fun.. --[[User:~~70.196.12.34~~\|~~70.196.12.34~~]] 00:35, 3 February 2007 (CST)	+	How can you discuss something without presenting an argument when that is simply a position on a topic. Ok..Done..and here I was just trying to be a little bad and have fun.. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 00:37, 3 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 3 February 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::Here, here. Totally against it. It is problematic FEATURING a fanfic. I think we should gather 'round and think of various themes that have run through LG15, whether early on or now. Pages related to those things should be featured, not response videos made by unrelated people. What does that add to our better understanding of lonelygirl15? I mean come on, if you are short of things, try featuring P. Monkey, or Owen, or Thor, to just name three. Each of those are deeply related to LG15 herself and would be of interest. There are other less well known but firmly canonical things which could also fit the bill of appropriateness, but a fanfic with no real cross-over in the lonelygirl world should make it. (Now if it was a fan-fic directly tied into the plot, or one that is obvious comedy, might be a different story.) [[User:HyeMew\|HyeMew]] 00:04, 3 February 2007 (CST)		:::Here, here. Totally against it. It is problematic FEATURING a fanfic. I think we should gather 'round and think of various themes that have run through LG15, whether early on or now. Pages related to those things should be featured, not response videos made by unrelated people. What does that add to our better understanding of lonelygirl15? I mean come on, if you are short of things, try featuring P. Monkey, or Owen, or Thor, to just name three. Each of those are deeply related to LG15 herself and would be of interest. There are other less well known but firmly canonical things which could also fit the bill of appropriateness, but a fanfic with no real cross-over in the lonelygirl world should make it. (Now if it was a fan-fic directly tied into the plot, or one that is obvious comedy, might be a different story.) [[User:HyeMew\|HyeMew]] 00:04, 3 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::Hah..I was just kidding I am actually for featuring it.. Actually..despite how problematic it is I think we need to make the effort to support some Fan SpinOffs prominently. We just need to check heavily to make sure that it doesn't get people totally confused with the LG15 storyline AND the CassieisWatching storyline as being canon for either. Maybe do a series of Fan Features. One for serious storyline, one for parody, one for straight fan commentary maybe? We could pick a few choices for each category and vote on which we use and then focus on prepping the article to get it ready for prime time. This name associated with this post I say should not be included... I've already basked in the glory of being mentioned by the creators in a letter that is posted RIGHT on the Fan Fiction page..so...that's that with that. Also I am against itscassie because of the cassie confusion. I'd say GC, Immant, and HSAO for serious. LonesomeOct, Apotheosis, and ItsKassie for parody...who the hell knows about other characters categories..we can figure some out. Also... let me say.. So much for not being a competetive debate. Actually, I don't think a true discussion is possible with out some competetive debate...otherwise its just mindless positions..kinda like the US congress. I just have to say one more thing... Don't think of an elephant.. and you thought of? An elephant of course..unless you don't understand the meaning of the word... It's inherent that if you tell someone NOT to do something..think something.. You have JUST put thoughts of that something in that person's mind where as before saying it the person may not have been thinking of it at all. Ok..Soapbox off!.
		+	How can you discuss something without presenting an argument when that is simply a position on a topic. Ok..Done..and here I was just trying to be a little bad and have fun.. --[[User:70.196.12.34\|70.196.12.34]] 00:35, 3 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 3 February 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::Without debate, I am totally against this. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 23:45, 2 February 2007 (CST)		::Without debate, I am totally against this. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 23:45, 2 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::Here, here. Totally against it. It is problematic FEATURING a fanfic. I think we should gather 'round and think of various themes that have run through LG15, whether early on or now. Pages related to those things should be featured, not response videos made by unrelated people. What does that add to our better understanding of lonelygirl15? I mean come on, if you are short of things, try featuring P. Monkey, or Owen, or Thor, to just name three. Each of those are deeply related to LG15 herself and would be of interest. There are other less well known but firmly canonical things which could also fit the bill of appropriateness, but a fanfic with no real cross-over in the lonelygirl world should make it. (Now if it was a fan-fic directly tied into the plot, or one that is obvious comedy, might be a different story.) [[User:HyeMew\|HyeMew]] 00:04, 3 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 3 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	{{feature nomination}}		{{feature nomination}}
	Ok, so I nominate GC's page because I think it has a fair amount of clarity, cleanliness and <i>is</i> related to LG15, as some of her videos are in response to LG15 videos, and the storyline revolves around a community, just like Bree's. And Like LL's page, let's not try to argue. This is a discussion, not a competitive debate. .--[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]		Ok, so I nominate GC's page because I think it has a fair amount of clarity, cleanliness and <i>is</i> related to LG15, as some of her videos are in response to LG15 videos, and the storyline revolves around a community, just like Bree's. And Like LL's page, let's not try to argue. This is a discussion, not a competitive debate. .--[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]
		+
		+
		+	::Without debate, I am totally against this. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 23:45, 2 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 3 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{{feature nomination}}		{{feature nomination}}
−	Ok, so I nominate GC's page because I think it has a fair amount of clarity, cleanliness and <i>is</i> related to LG15, as some of her videos are in response to LG15 videos, and the storyline ~~revolvesaround~~ a community, just like Bree's. And Like LL's page, let's not try to argue. This is a discussion, not a competitive debate. .--[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]	+	Ok, so I nominate GC's page because I think it has a fair amount of clarity, cleanliness and <i>is</i> related to LG15, as some of her videos are in response to LG15 videos, and the storyline revolves around a community, just like Bree's. And Like LL's page, let's not try to argue. This is a discussion, not a competitive debate. .--[[User:Crowcity\|Crowcity]]