Talk:Semiotics - Revision history

Anto687: Links to altered Ligatures and Amalgamation

2007-02-28T10:31:08Z

Links to altered Ligatures and Amalgamation

OwenIsCool at 21:33, 27 February 2007

2007-02-27T21:33:05Z

Anto687: Altered exposure on the .jpg files

2007-02-27T18:19:09Z

Altered exposure on the .jpg files

Anto687 at 17:59, 27 February 2007

2007-02-27T17:59:52Z

Anto687 at 00:19, 27 February 2007

2007-02-27T00:19:34Z

Anto687 at 00:17, 27 February 2007

2007-02-27T00:17:02Z

OwenIsCool at 23:39, 26 February 2007

2007-02-26T23:39:36Z

Brucker at 23:31, 26 February 2007

2007-02-26T23:31:41Z

New page

In Phoenician, 'pe' is symolic of a mouth, if that's helpful to anyone interpreting the two-legged watcher symbol. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 17:31, 26 February 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :Hey Anto,
-:Interesting research.  You can put those images on the talk page here if you want.  I just don't want to put anything in the article yet that might be misleading (even if not intentionally so), because it might confuse people.  Complicating things further, I'm now considering moving the detailed contents section to the [[Bree's disk]] article.  If I leave it here, this page is too long and that article is empty.  For now I'm sure it's fine to put your pics on this Talk page, though.  I'd like to see them if you have them.
+:Interesting research.  You can put those images on the talk page here if you want.  I just don't want to put anything in the article yet that m[ight be misleading (even if not intentionally so), because it might confuse people.  Complicating things further, I'm now considering moving the detailed contents section to the [[Bree's disk]] article.  If I leave it here, this page is too long and that article is empty.  For now I'm sure it's fi]ne to put your pics on this Talk page, though.  I'd like to see them if you have them.
 :Do post your research at the forum too, I think they're still working on this!
 :[[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 15:33, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 27 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]] - EDIT: Not sure if the altered images are worth uploading, as I'm sure that they can be altered (exposure-wise) further, I just don't know where to take them. Let me know if you want to see what I see! [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]] 12:19, 27 February 2007 (CST)		The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]] - EDIT: Not sure if the altered images are worth uploading, as I'm sure that they can be altered (exposure-wise) further, I just don't know where to take them. Let me know if you want to see what I see! [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]] 12:19, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:Hey Anto,
		+	:Interesting research. You can put those images on the talk page here if you want. I just don't want to put anything in the article yet that might be misleading (even if not intentionally so), because it might confuse people. Complicating things further, I'm now considering moving the detailed contents section to the [[Bree's disk]] article. If I leave it here, this page is too long and that article is empty. For now I'm sure it's fine to put your pics on this Talk page, though. I'd like to see them if you have them.
		+	:Do post your research at the forum too, I think they're still working on this!
		+	:[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:33, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 27 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:


−	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]]	+	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]] - EDIT: Not sure if the altered images are worth uploading, as I'm sure that they can be altered (exposure-wise) further, I just don't know where to take them. Let me know if you want to see what I see! [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]] 12:19, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 27 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:


−	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - Anto687	+	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687\|Anto687]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 27 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:


−	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in ~~LITGATURES~~. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - Anto687	+	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - Anto687

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 27 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:This article is starting to get pretty long, and if the microwriting stuff proves relevant, it'd get even longer. Any suggestions on how I could divide it up in a logical way? Not that I'd do it right away, just if it becomes necessary.		:This article is starting to get pretty long, and if the microwriting stuff proves relevant, it'd get even longer. Any suggestions on how I could divide it up in a logical way? Not that I'd do it right away, just if it becomes necessary.
	:[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 17:39, 26 February 2007 (CST)		:[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 17:39, 26 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LITGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - Anto687

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 26 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In Phoenician, 'pe' is symolic of a mouth, if that's helpful to anyone interpreting the two-legged watcher symbol. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 17:31, 26 February 2007 (CST)		In Phoenician, 'pe' is symolic of a mouth, if that's helpful to anyone interpreting the two-legged watcher symbol. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 17:31, 26 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:Thanks, Brucker. Maybe it's what they send you to warn you of impending doom. Like that mark that was put on Jack Sparrow's hand when he was cursed (Pirates of the Caribbean... II, I think). I don't want to update any more until they come up with something definite on the forum though. From the looks of it now they've found microwriting in the images...
		+	:This article is starting to get pretty long, and if the microwriting stuff proves relevant, it'd get even longer. Any suggestions on how I could divide it up in a logical way? Not that I'd do it right away, just if it becomes necessary.
		+	:[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 17:39, 26 February 2007 (CST)