Talk:The swimming hole - Revision history

Zoey: Merge with "Hiking trails"

2007-05-17T04:56:57Z

Merge with "Hiking trails"

Modelmotion at 05:03, 21 November 2006

2006-11-21T05:03:32Z

Modelmotion at 14:05, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T14:05:45Z

Twjaniak at 14:02, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T14:02:58Z

Twjaniak at 13:57, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T13:57:20Z

JayHenry at 03:03, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T03:03:37Z

Modelmotion at 02:58, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T02:58:13Z

Modelmotion at 02:57, 16 November 2006

2006-11-16T02:57:24Z

New page

I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 17 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	What's going on with this "an expansion or major revamping?"--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 23:03, 20 November 2006 (CST)		What's going on with this "an expansion or major revamping?"--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 23:03, 20 November 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	== Merge with "Hiking trails" ==
		+
		+	Does anyone object to me merging this with "Hiking Trails". It's already mentioned on that page, it might make sense just to have the info directly on there and then have this page redirect to hiking trails. What do people think? --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 23:56, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 21 November 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:This does not really work for me because it does not provide a page where fact that appear about the location can be added. Where is it, what is the significance of the location, what else has happened there, etc etc etc.....There are a lot of ways these pages could develop if left alone and I do not feel I should have to defend them on a one by one basis. The central idea is that we keep a list of location pages where users can fill in addional information, add screen shots, discusss signicafant factors. I think that concpet works very very very well and should be left alone. --[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 06:05, 16 November 2006 (PST)		:This does not really work for me because it does not provide a page where fact that appear about the location can be added. Where is it, what is the significance of the location, what else has happened there, etc etc etc.....There are a lot of ways these pages could develop if left alone and I do not feel I should have to defend them on a one by one basis. The central idea is that we keep a list of location pages where users can fill in addional information, add screen shots, discusss signicafant factors. I think that concpet works very very very well and should be left alone. --[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 06:05, 16 November 2006 (PST)
		+
		+
		+	What's going on with this "an expansion or major revamping?"--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 23:03, 20 November 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 16 November 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the [[Swimming!]] video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of [[Cassieiswatching]] or [[Swimming!]]. I feel that this article warrants deletion. Redirects from Swimming Hole could lead to the video's page instead. This is how the such issues are frequently handled on the WIkiPedia. -- [[User:Twjaniak\|Twjaniak]] 05:57, 16 November 2006 (PST)		Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the [[Swimming!]] video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of [[Cassieiswatching]] or [[Swimming!]]. I feel that this article warrants deletion. Redirects from Swimming Hole could lead to the video's page instead. This is how the such issues are frequently handled on the WIkiPedia. -- [[User:Twjaniak\|Twjaniak]] 05:57, 16 November 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	:This does not really work for me because it does not provide a page where fact that appear about the location can be added. Where is it, what is the significance of the location, what else has happened there, etc etc etc.....There are a lot of ways these pages could develop if left alone and I do not feel I should have to defend them on a one by one basis. The central idea is that we keep a list of location pages where users can fill in addional information, add screen shots, discusss signicafant factors. I think that concpet works very very very well and should be left alone. --[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 06:05, 16 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 16 November 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Modelmotion, would you please read my points in the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]]. Nobody is saying the ''information'' should be deleted. We are saying that the locations do not need ''separate pages''. We are not removing locations from LGPedia, we are simply organizing them in a way that makes sense. Please continue the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]] unless you have particular points to add about the Swimming Hole as deserving of its own page.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (PST)		:Modelmotion, would you please read my points in the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]]. Nobody is saying the ''information'' should be deleted. We are saying that the locations do not need ''separate pages''. We are not removing locations from LGPedia, we are simply organizing them in a way that makes sense. Please continue the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]] unless you have particular points to add about the Swimming Hole as deserving of its own page.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (PST)

−	Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the [[Swimming!]] video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of [[Cassieiswatching]] or [[Swimming!]]. I feel that this article warrants deletion. -- [[User:Twjaniak\|Twjaniak]] 05:57, 16 November 2006 (PST)	+
		+	Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the [[Swimming!]] video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of [[Cassieiswatching]] or [[Swimming!]]. I feel that this article warrants deletion. Redirects from Swimming Hole could lead to the video's page instead. This is how the such issues are frequently handled on the WIkiPedia. -- [[User:Twjaniak\|Twjaniak]] 05:57, 16 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 16 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 18:58, 15 November 2006 (PST)		I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 18:58, 15 November 2006 (PST)
	:Modelmotion, would you please read my points in the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]]. Nobody is saying the ''information'' should be deleted. We are saying that the locations do not need ''separate pages''. We are not removing locations from LGPedia, we are simply organizing them in a way that makes sense. Please continue the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]] unless you have particular points to add about the Swimming Hole as deserving of its own page.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (PST)		:Modelmotion, would you please read my points in the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]]. Nobody is saying the ''information'' should be deleted. We are saying that the locations do not need ''separate pages''. We are not removing locations from LGPedia, we are simply organizing them in a way that makes sense. Please continue the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]] unless you have particular points to add about the Swimming Hole as deserving of its own page.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the [[Swimming!]] video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of [[Cassieiswatching]] or [[Swimming!]]. I feel that this article warrants deletion. -- [[User:Twjaniak\|Twjaniak]] 05:57, 16 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 16 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 18:58, 15 November 2006 (PST)		I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 18:58, 15 November 2006 (PST)
		+	:Modelmotion, would you please read my points in the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]]. Nobody is saying the ''information'' should be deleted. We are saying that the locations do not need ''separate pages''. We are not removing locations from LGPedia, we are simply organizing them in a way that makes sense. Please continue the discussion at [[Talk:Main Page]] unless you have particular points to add about the Swimming Hole as deserving of its own page.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:03, 15 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 16 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.	+	I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 18:58, 15 November 2006 (PST)