Talk:The warehouse - Revision history

OwenIsCool at 00:38, 3 February 2007

2007-02-03T00:38:34Z

Killthesmiley at 23:41, 2 February 2007

2007-02-02T23:41:20Z

Skeeta at 08:57, 13 December 2006

2006-12-13T08:57:12Z

SilverBULLETx3: /* Similarity to other warehouse */

2006-12-12T21:24:14Z

‎Similarity to other warehouse

SilverBULLETx3: Similarity to other warehouse

2006-12-12T21:24:00Z

Similarity to other warehouse

Modelmotion at 01:34, 5 December 2006

2006-12-05T01:34:35Z

Modelmotion at 01:29, 5 December 2006

2006-12-05T01:29:32Z

Brucker at 00:49, 5 December 2006

2006-12-05T00:49:01Z

New page

==Disagreement==
I don't see any logo on that wheel; it looks like a standard trashcan to me. Also I disagree with the "watcher" paragraph. There's no reason why people in the background could not simply be there randomly. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 18:49, 4 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 3 February 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==change in name==		==change in name==
	can we cange the article's title? There a two warehouses now, seeing that this is an abandoned warehouse, then there was the warehouse daniel broke into. --[[User:Killthesmiley\|Killthesmiley]] 17:41, 2 February 2007 (CST)		can we cange the article's title? There a two warehouses now, seeing that this is an abandoned warehouse, then there was the warehouse daniel broke into. --[[User:Killthesmiley\|Killthesmiley]] 17:41, 2 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:Hmm, you're totally right. There's the "homeless" warehouse, and the Epogen warehouse. How about just having a "Warehouses" article, as a kind of "other" location, and then jut a section on each of the two. That way people who are looking for info can't get frustrated that they can't find the right one. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:38, 2 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 2 February 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I was just thinking that if you inspect the exterior of the warehouse, it really looks like the warehouse at the end of the Learning to Drive video. [[User:SilverBULLETx3\|SilverBULLETx3]] 15:24, 12 December 2006 (CST)		I was just thinking that if you inspect the exterior of the warehouse, it really looks like the warehouse at the end of the Learning to Drive video. [[User:SilverBULLETx3\|SilverBULLETx3]] 15:24, 12 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	==change in name==
		+	can we cange the article's title? There a two warehouses now, seeing that this is an abandoned warehouse, then there was the warehouse daniel broke into. --[[User:Killthesmiley\|Killthesmiley]] 17:41, 2 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 13 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	who cares about the wheel? It's not going to help us identify the place. and how is the brickwork "distinctive"?--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 02:57, 13 December 2006 (CST)
		+
	==Disagreement==		==Disagreement==
	I don't see any logo on that wheel; it looks like a standard trashcan to me. Also I disagree with the "watcher" paragraph. There's no reason why people in the background could not simply be there randomly. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 18:49, 4 December 2006 (CST)		I don't see any logo on that wheel; it looks like a standard trashcan to me. Also I disagree with the "watcher" paragraph. There's no reason why people in the background could not simply be there randomly. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 18:49, 4 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 12 December 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Similarity to other warehouse ==		== Similarity to other warehouse ==

−	I was just thinking that if you inspect the exterior of the warehouse, it really looks like the warehouse at the end of the Learning to Drive video.	+	I was just thinking that if you inspect the exterior of the warehouse, it really looks like the warehouse at the end of the Learning to Drive video. [[User:SilverBULLETx3\|SilverBULLETx3]] 15:24, 12 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 12 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I am not sure its a trash can lid. I guess it could be so perhaps you could rewrite it to make it a bit more inclusive. It just stood out the way it was edited so I am thinking it had some significance. However some people have commented that the crow was the point of the shot, so who knows.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 19:34, 4 December 2006 (CST)		:I am not sure its a trash can lid. I guess it could be so perhaps you could rewrite it to make it a bit more inclusive. It just stood out the way it was edited so I am thinking it had some significance. However some people have commented that the crow was the point of the shot, so who knows.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 19:34, 4 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	== Similarity to other warehouse ==
		+
		+	I was just thinking that if you inspect the exterior of the warehouse, it really looks like the warehouse at the end of the Learning to Drive video.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 5 December 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:I dont know if you have ever worked on a film production but I have and in any production I have been involved in people in the background are almost always controlled. Now this maybe very low budget and perhaps they cannot afford a PA to do the job but most directors only want element in a scene that they want in a scene........especially when they know that people are looking for that kind of detail.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 19:29, 4 December 2006 (CST)		:I dont know if you have ever worked on a film production but I have and in any production I have been involved in people in the background are almost always controlled. Now this maybe very low budget and perhaps they cannot afford a PA to do the job but most directors only want element in a scene that they want in a scene........especially when they know that people are looking for that kind of detail.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 19:29, 4 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	:I am not sure its a trash can lid. I guess it could be so perhaps you could rewrite it to make it a bit more inclusive. It just stood out the way it was edited so I am thinking it had some significance. However some people have commented that the crow was the point of the shot, so who knows.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 19:34, 4 December 2006 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 5 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Disagreement==		==Disagreement==
	I don't see any logo on that wheel; it looks like a standard trashcan to me. Also I disagree with the "watcher" paragraph. There's no reason why people in the background could not simply be there randomly. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 18:49, 4 December 2006 (CST)		I don't see any logo on that wheel; it looks like a standard trashcan to me. Also I disagree with the "watcher" paragraph. There's no reason why people in the background could not simply be there randomly. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 18:49, 4 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	:I dont know if you have ever worked on a film production but I have and in any production I have been involved in people in the background are almost always controlled. Now this maybe very low budget and perhaps they cannot afford a PA to do the job but most directors only want element in a scene that they want in a scene........especially when they know that people are looking for that kind of detail.--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 19:29, 4 December 2006 (CST)