Talk:Theories About Characters - Revision history

75.9.46.71: /* Stupid Theories */

2008-10-16T04:18:21Z

‎Stupid Theories

75.9.46.71: /* Stupid Theories */

2008-10-16T04:18:07Z

‎Stupid Theories

Nancypants at 01:48, 6 June 2008

2008-06-06T01:48:10Z

Nancypants: /* Parallel characters? */

2008-05-30T22:54:54Z

‎Parallel characters?

Nancypants: /* Parallel characters? */

2008-05-21T01:05:52Z

‎Parallel characters?

Shiori: /* Parallel characters? */

2008-05-15T16:28:31Z

‎Parallel characters?

Nancypants: /* Sisters? */

2008-05-15T02:06:05Z

‎Sisters?

Nancypants: New section: Parallel characters?

2008-05-15T02:05:19Z

New section: Parallel characters?

Shiori at 16:34, 21 March 2008

2008-03-21T16:34:33Z

70.134.119.153: /* Julia=Mallory */

2008-02-24T02:13:36Z

‎Julia=Mallory

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 16 October 2008
Line 106:		Line 106:
	== Stupid Theories ==		== Stupid Theories ==
	Ok I know I'm kind of bitchy about this page, but is this page for serious theories or for jokes? There are so many on here that are absolutely absurd and you just ''know'' that no one is working on a theory so ridiculous. Like Lucy being a voodoo witch or Bree being a clone of Gina? How stupid! Is everyone else OK with this buffoonery? (that's right I said buffoonery) [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:48, 5 June 2008 (CDT)		Ok I know I'm kind of bitchy about this page, but is this page for serious theories or for jokes? There are so many on here that are absolutely absurd and you just ''know'' that no one is working on a theory so ridiculous. Like Lucy being a voodoo witch or Bree being a clone of Gina? How stupid! Is everyone else OK with this buffoonery? (that's right I said buffoonery) [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:48, 5 June 2008 (CDT)
−	~~I agree!~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 16 October 2008
Line 106:		Line 106:
	== Stupid Theories ==		== Stupid Theories ==
	Ok I know I'm kind of bitchy about this page, but is this page for serious theories or for jokes? There are so many on here that are absolutely absurd and you just ''know'' that no one is working on a theory so ridiculous. Like Lucy being a voodoo witch or Bree being a clone of Gina? How stupid! Is everyone else OK with this buffoonery? (that's right I said buffoonery) [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:48, 5 June 2008 (CDT)		Ok I know I'm kind of bitchy about this page, but is this page for serious theories or for jokes? There are so many on here that are absolutely absurd and you just ''know'' that no one is working on a theory so ridiculous. Like Lucy being a voodoo witch or Bree being a clone of Gina? How stupid! Is everyone else OK with this buffoonery? (that's right I said buffoonery) [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:48, 5 June 2008 (CDT)
		+	I agree!

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 6 June 2008
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Alright, I removed them because of all the afore mentioned reasons and the fact that the only person who even responded agreed with me. I hope that if someone is angered by this they will ''talk'' about it on the ''talk page'' and give some reasons. I just really think a lot of people don't know what "Parallel Character" means and just think it sounds cool. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 17:54, 30 May 2008 (CDT)		Alright, I removed them because of all the afore mentioned reasons and the fact that the only person who even responded agreed with me. I hope that if someone is angered by this they will ''talk'' about it on the ''talk page'' and give some reasons. I just really think a lot of people don't know what "Parallel Character" means and just think it sounds cool. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 17:54, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	== Stupid Theories ==
		+	Ok I know I'm kind of bitchy about this page, but is this page for serious theories or for jokes? There are so many on here that are absolutely absurd and you just ''know'' that no one is working on a theory so ridiculous. Like Lucy being a voodoo witch or Bree being a clone of Gina? How stupid! Is everyone else OK with this buffoonery? (that's right I said buffoonery) [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:48, 5 June 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 30 May 2008
Line 101:		Line 101:

	::I really wish to remove them, I think they make the whole page look ridiculous. Any objections? I'll leave it for a while longer but, please speak up and give reason if you think they should stay. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:05, 20 May 2008 (CDT)		::I really wish to remove them, I think they make the whole page look ridiculous. Any objections? I'll leave it for a while longer but, please speak up and give reason if you think they should stay. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:05, 20 May 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	Alright, I removed them because of all the afore mentioned reasons and the fact that the only person who even responded agreed with me. I hope that if someone is angered by this they will ''talk'' about it on the ''talk page'' and give some reasons. I just really think a lot of people don't know what "Parallel Character" means and just think it sounds cool. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 17:54, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 21 May 2008
Line 99:		Line 99:

	:I completely agree, but if we do remove them, we'll have to tread lightly. I got bitched out when I simply moved the theory of Julia being parallel to Mallory... - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 11:28, 15 May 2008 (CDT)		:I completely agree, but if we do remove them, we'll have to tread lightly. I got bitched out when I simply moved the theory of Julia being parallel to Mallory... - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 11:28, 15 May 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	::I really wish to remove them, I think they make the whole page look ridiculous. Any objections? I'll leave it for a while longer but, please speak up and give reason if you think they should stay. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 20:05, 20 May 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 15 May 2008
Line 97:		Line 97:

	I was just wondering why there are so many theories on who is and who is not parallel characters to one another. A parallel character is another character (in the same piece of literature/art or another) that is very similar if not almost exactly the same as the original character chosen. I don't see how that fits any of our characters and it's borderline ridiculous that there are so many (seriously guys, Charlie and ''Taylor''?!) I think these should be removed as they can never be proven or disproven. For example, apparently someone thought Charlie and ''Sarah'' were different enough to move that "theory" over to the disproven side, but what if someone decides that they aren't? I really think this is silly and not even a theory but more like random opinions. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 21:05, 14 May 2008 (CDT)		I was just wondering why there are so many theories on who is and who is not parallel characters to one another. A parallel character is another character (in the same piece of literature/art or another) that is very similar if not almost exactly the same as the original character chosen. I don't see how that fits any of our characters and it's borderline ridiculous that there are so many (seriously guys, Charlie and ''Taylor''?!) I think these should be removed as they can never be proven or disproven. For example, apparently someone thought Charlie and ''Sarah'' were different enough to move that "theory" over to the disproven side, but what if someone decides that they aren't? I really think this is silly and not even a theory but more like random opinions. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 21:05, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	:I completely agree, but if we do remove them, we'll have to tread lightly. I got bitched out when I simply moved the theory of Julia being parallel to Mallory... - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 11:28, 15 May 2008 (CDT)

@@ Line 92: / Line 92: @@
 I don't see how it's disproven that Kate or Emma could be biologically related to Bree and Gina. Isn't there enough time between their ages that Kate could have been sold from the same mother before Gina was born or Emma was taken after Gina and Bree were taken?
 == Parallel characters? ==
 I was just wondering why there are so many theories on who is and who is not parallel characters to one another. A parallel character is another character (in the same piece of literature/art or another) that is very similar if not almost exactly the same as the original character chosen. I don't see how that fits any of our characters and it's borderline ridiculous that there are so many (seriously guys, Charlie and ''Taylor''?!) I think these should be removed as they can never be proven or disproven. For example, apparently someone thought Charlie and ''Sarah'' were different enough to move that "theory" over to the disproven side, but what if someone decides that they aren't? I really think this is silly and not even a theory but more like random opinions. [[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 21:05, 14 May 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 15 May 2008
Line 92:		Line 92:

	I don't see how it's disproven that Kate or Emma could be biologically related to Bree and Gina. Isn't there enough time between their ages that Kate could have been sold from the same mother before Gina was born or Emma was taken after Gina and Bree were taken?		I don't see how it's disproven that Kate or Emma could be biologically related to Bree and Gina. Isn't there enough time between their ages that Kate could have been sold from the same mother before Gina was born or Emma was taken after Gina and Bree were taken?
		+
		+	== Parallel characters? ==
		+
		+	I was just wondering why there are so many theories on who is and who is not parallel characters to one another. A parallel character is another character (in the same piece of literature/art or another) that is very similar if not almost exactly the same as the original character chosen. I don't see how that fits any of our characters and it's borderline ridiculous that there are so many (seriously guys, Charlie and ''Taylor''?!) I think these should be removed as they can never be proven or disproven. For example, apparently someone thought Charlie and ''Sarah'' were different enough to move that "theory" over to the disproven side, but what if someone decides that they aren't? I really think this is silly and not even a theory but more like random opinions. [[User:Nancypants\|Nancypants]] 21:05, 14 May 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 21 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==What can be considered Proven/Disproven==
		+	(I'm tacking this up here, hoping more people may see it.) Based on general consensus from previous discussions, here's a general guideline to follow before moving something from being a theory to being proven or disproven:
		+	#Was the theory explicitly proven or disproven in a video or by the Creators?
		+	#If not, can it be generally inferred from the two aforementioned sources?
		+	##Keep in mind, stating that something is mentioned on the Pedia is generally ''not'' a good source for your reasoning. The Pedia is run by ''fans'', and we can be wrong on occasion. (Proving a character will never be seen again, for instance, based on being moved to the "former" characters list is not accurate.)
		+	#Is the theory a joke theory? (Note: These should be found nowhere outside of the P. Monkey section.)
		+	##If so, go nuts with disproving or proving. These are meant to be fun!
		+
		+	I basically just compiled this list hoping that some of my pet peeves of moving theories would stop occurring. Feel free to comment or expand on anything. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 11:34, 21 March 2008 (CDT)
		+
	==Theories?==		==Theories?==
	I really like a page for character theories, but I get the feeling some of the "theories" here are just fan speculation. Any thoughts? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 17:58, 30 June 2007 (CDT)		I really like a page for character theories, but I get the feeling some of the "theories" here are just fan speculation. Any thoughts? --[[User:Phoenician\|Pheon]] 17:58, 30 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 24 February 2008
Line 78:		Line 78:
	I'm unclear as to how it Julia isn't a parallel character to Mallory? Is it because of Mallory's relationship with Del Mundo? Seems to sort superficial, don't you think? Especially seeing as how Daniel broke it off with Mallory just a little before Julia broke it off with Tariq. That actually made me wonder if Kate was parallel to Sarah (because of her time missing when she was with the Lullaby Project, too.) <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:70.134.119.153\|70.134.119.153]] ([[User talk:70.134.119.153\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.134.119.153\|contribs]]) {{{2\|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->		I'm unclear as to how it Julia isn't a parallel character to Mallory? Is it because of Mallory's relationship with Del Mundo? Seems to sort superficial, don't you think? Especially seeing as how Daniel broke it off with Mallory just a little before Julia broke it off with Tariq. That actually made me wonder if Kate was parallel to Sarah (because of her time missing when she was with the Lullaby Project, too.) <small>—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:70.134.119.153\|70.134.119.153]] ([[User talk:70.134.119.153\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.134.119.153\|contribs]]) {{{2\|}}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
	:It's moreso disproven because of the role Julia's been playing in KateModern. Mallory was never, EVER even close to a main character, whereas Julia is off by herself advancing the plot of the show and not with Tariq anymore. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 06:57, 19 February 2008 (CST)		:It's moreso disproven because of the role Julia's been playing in KateModern. Mallory was never, EVER even close to a main character, whereas Julia is off by herself advancing the plot of the show and not with Tariq anymore. - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 06:57, 19 February 2008 (CST)
		+
		+	== Sisters? ==
		+
		+	I don't see how it's disproven that Kate or Emma could be biologically related to Bree and Gina. Isn't there enough time between their ages that Kate could have been sold from the same mother before Gina was born or Emma was taken after Gina and Bree were taken?