Template talk:Clr - Revision history

Renegade: Interesting...

2007-06-05T16:58:51Z

Interesting...

Renegade at 17:24, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T17:24:43Z

JayHenry at 17:21, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T17:21:15Z

JayHenry at 17:20, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T17:20:16Z

Zoey at 15:11, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T15:11:51Z

Renegade at 12:31, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T12:31:44Z

JayHenry at 03:23, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T03:23:44Z

Renegade: Zoey obviously doesn't like my templates

2007-06-03T00:23:51Z

Zoey obviously doesn't like my templates

Zoey at 23:54, 2 June 2007

2007-06-02T23:54:07Z

New page

If there are no objections in 24 hours I will delete :) --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 18:54, 2 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 5 June 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	::If you didn't force me to resolve editing conflicts, I'd have replied already :P		::If you didn't force me to resolve editing conflicts, I'd have replied already :P
	:::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 12:24, 3 June 2007 (CDT)		:::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 12:24, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	My points about everything get reinforced once more. While cataloging all templates for [[LGPedia:Templates]], I found [[Template:Brclear]] - which does essentially the same, only through CSS rather than HTML, and with more useless styles attached. Guess how often it's used?<br>
		+	115 times. It's part of Template:Banned and several other templates.<br>
		+	Apparently, there is a high demand for a template doing a clearing break. But thanks to the wonderful way templates are currently organized, no one ever knew it existed even before no one knew again it existed, evident by the fact that even our own administrators tried to delete this one for not being used, rather than being a duplicate. Thank me I'm writing a catalogue now. -_-
		+
		+	I hereby propose to compare both templates and keep the one deemed better, to be used in Template:Banned and wherever else necessary, perhaps keeping a previous name and using the code from the other.<br>
		+	Obviously, I prefer for my own template, as it actually explains what it does, and only does that - the action of clearing both sides from floating elements. The other one is lacking documentation and minimizes padding, margin, line-height, and more.
		+	:~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 11:58, 5 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 3 June 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)		The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	:If nobody knows there even is a tag, yes it is. [[Template talk:HoverTOC\|Read here for more]]. '''[Resolved editing conflict]'''
		+	::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 12:24, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

	: Not to mention that the category of deleted pages is linked from every page that's deleted, as is an explanation of our deletion policy (the one week waiting period to which Zoey adhered to) and it's also linked to from our community portal. Renegade, would you prefer a one month waiting period? If so, let's discuss but please be civil. My concerns with your tone are that you're accusing Zoey of using "wtf kind of tactics" on some sneaky underhanded "campaign" to ("why the hell") force people to write <br clear="all"> templates, when in fact all she's done is follow our policies in trying to clean out the unused templates page. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 12:20, 3 June 2007 (CDT)		: Not to mention that the category of deleted pages is linked from every page that's deleted, as is an explanation of our deletion policy (the one week waiting period to which Zoey adhered to) and it's also linked to from our community portal. Renegade, would you prefer a one month waiting period? If so, let's discuss but please be civil. My concerns with your tone are that you're accusing Zoey of using "wtf kind of tactics" on some sneaky underhanded "campaign" to ("why the hell") force people to write <br clear="all"> templates, when in fact all she's done is follow our policies in trying to clean out the unused templates page. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 12:20, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::If you didn't force me to resolve editing conflicts, I'd have replied already :P
		+	:::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 12:24, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 3 June 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)		The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

−	: Not to mention that the category of deleted pages is linked from every page that's deleted, as is an explanation of our deletion policy (the one week waiting period to which Zoey adhered to) and it's also linked to from our community portal. Renegade, would you prefer a one month waiting period? If so, let's discuss but please be civil. My concerns with your tone are that you're accusing Zoey of using "wtf kind of tactics" on some sneaky underhanded "campaign" to ("why the hell") force people to write <br clear="all"&gt templates, when in fact all she's done is follow our policies in trying to clean out the unused templates page. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 12:20, 3 June 2007 (CDT)	+	: Not to mention that the category of deleted pages is linked from every page that's deleted, as is an explanation of our deletion policy (the one week waiting period to which Zoey adhered to) and it's also linked to from our community portal. Renegade, would you prefer a one month waiting period? If so, let's discuss but please be civil. My concerns with your tone are that you're accusing Zoey of using "wtf kind of tactics" on some sneaky underhanded "campaign" to ("why the hell") force people to write <br clear="all"> templates, when in fact all she's done is follow our policies in trying to clean out the unused templates page. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 12:20, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 3 June 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)		The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	: Not to mention that the category of deleted pages is linked from every page that's deleted, as is an explanation of our deletion policy (the one week waiting period to which Zoey adhered to) and it's also linked to from our community portal. Renegade, would you prefer a one month waiting period? If so, let's discuss but please be civil. My concerns with your tone are that you're accusing Zoey of using "wtf kind of tactics" on some sneaky underhanded "campaign" to ("why the hell") force people to write <br clear="all"&gt templates, when in fact all she's done is follow our policies in trying to clean out the unused templates page. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 12:20, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 3 June 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::What if I had been away over the weekend, hm? Then the template would've been gone by tonight and I wouldn't even ''know'' about the deletion, and would have had no way to object. wtf kind of tactic is that?		:::What if I had been away over the weekend, hm? Then the template would've been gone by tonight and I wouldn't even ''know'' about the deletion, and would have had no way to object. wtf kind of tactic is that?
	::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 07:31, 3 June 2007 (CDT)		::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 07:31, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	The delete tag has been up on this page for 6 days. There were no objections, so I put a 24 hour notice on it. 6 days is not really an unreasonable amount of time to wait before giving a 24 hour deadline. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 10:11, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 3 June 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:: Renegade, there's really no reason for that tone. Zoey said, "if no objections," but you objected so, no big deal, we'll keep it. Zoey meant no harm and absolutely no offense. When you first made your point about no template catalogue I directed you to [[:category:Templates]] — months later it continues to function as our template catalogue. The categories are, in fact, sorted by function and their names should make their purpose fairly obvious. If you'd like to further document the templates, you're more than welcome to. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:23, 2 June 2007 (CDT)		:: Renegade, there's really no reason for that tone. Zoey said, "if no objections," but you objected so, no big deal, we'll keep it. Zoey meant no harm and absolutely no offense. When you first made your point about no template catalogue I directed you to [[:category:Templates]] — months later it continues to function as our template catalogue. The categories are, in fact, sorted by function and their names should make their purpose fairly obvious. If you'd like to further document the templates, you're more than welcome to. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:23, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	:::What "tone"? Those were very valid question. There is no reason to delete this template, deleting it would serve no purpose at all, and yet she's pushing through with an objection time of a mere 24 hours.
		+	:::What if I had been away over the weekend, hm? Then the template would've been gone by tonight and I wouldn't even ''know'' about the deletion, and would have had no way to object. wtf kind of tactic is that?
		+	::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 07:31, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:23, 3 June 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Deleting this template serves no purpose at all.		:Deleting this template serves no purpose at all.
	::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 19:23, 2 June 2007 (CDT)		::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 19:23, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	:: Renegade, there's really no reason for that tone. Zoey said, "if no objections," but you objected so, no big deal, we'll keep it. Zoey meant no harm and absolutely no offense. When you first made your point about no template catalogue I directed you to [[:category:Templates]] — months later it continues to function as our template catalogue. The categories are, in fact, sorted by function and their names should make their purpose fairly obvious. If you'd like to further document the templates, you're more than welcome to. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 22:23, 2 June 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 3 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	If there are no objections in 24 hours I will delete :) --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 18:54, 2 June 2007 (CDT)		If there are no objections in 24 hours I will delete :) --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 18:54, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
		+	:Objection? Why the hell would you want to force people to write <br clear="all"> if they don't even know wth they're doing or what either <br> or clear does?
		+	:It's a convenience template, and it probably doesn't even eat a KB of space...so why delete it?
		+	:If it's not used, that's probably only due to lack of propaganda...people just don't know it exists. (Which returns us back to the point I made months ago...LGPedia is lacking a central templates catalogue. Seeing 100 pages starting with Template: in a category listing doesn't tell me what they all do.)
		+	:And if they ''do'' know it exists, they'll be confused when they need it, 'cause it'll be gone.
		+	:Deleting this template serves no purpose at all.
		+	::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 19:23, 2 June 2007 (CDT)