Template talk:Inuse - Revision history

Zoey at 21:29, 16 June 2007

2007-06-16T21:29:02Z

Renegade: crude...but it works.

2007-02-28T03:39:24Z

crude...but it works.

JayHenry at 01:28, 28 February 2007

2007-02-28T01:28:50Z

JayHenry at 01:26, 28 February 2007

2007-02-28T01:26:25Z

JayHenry at 01:24, 28 February 2007

2007-02-28T01:24:11Z

Renegade: Just thought I'd elaborate a little

2007-02-28T00:17:12Z

Just thought I'd elaborate a little

OwenIsCool at 21:48, 27 February 2007

2007-02-27T21:48:23Z

OwenIsCool: that can be fixed

2007-02-27T21:46:31Z

that can be fixed

Jonpro: Category

2007-02-27T20:58:22Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :uhhh, interesting... I hadn't noticed.  Well, I think it's just happening because the templates are being used to demonstrate.  That can be fixed.  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 15:46, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 ::pffft... I had every intention of fixing it... but when I looked at the code I didn't see what I had expected to see.  Oh well...  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 15:48, 27 February 2007 (CST)
-:::The problem is that the template includes another template which includes the original template. The category-tag is marked correctly as "include only", but the page then includes [[Template:Inuse/doc]], which in turn includes [[Template:Inuse]] for demonstration purposes - and since, on include, Inuse ''does'' include the category, both pages logically get categorized.
+:::The problem is that the template includes another template which includes the original template. The category-tag is marked correctly as "include only", but the page then includes Template:Inuse/doc, which in turn includes [[Template:Inuse]] for demonstration purposes - and since, on include, Inuse ''does'' include the category, both pages logically get categorized.
 :::In other words: The template behaves exactly as it should do, and there's no way (and no reason) to fix that. Except, of course, removing the examples from the documentation.
 ::::[[User:Renegade|Renegade]] 18:17, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 28 February 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:::::And, while I'm here, to address Renegade's point there's a good and very obvious reason to fix it. The category is for "Articles actively undergoing a major edit" and clearly the Inuse template is not actively undergoing a major edit.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:28, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:::::And, while I'm here, to address Renegade's point there's a good and very obvious reason to fix it. The category is for "Articles actively undergoing a major edit" and clearly the Inuse template is not actively undergoing a major edit.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:28, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::::You misunderstood me there...when I said there was no reason to fix it, I ment that the template actually was correctly coded and behaved exactly as it should. Its behavior was just inconvenient in this particular situation.
		+	::::::I didn't consider Subst: simply because it's something different...it's equivalent to hard-coding the boxes into the "doc" page, meaning they'll have to be updated by hand (or removed and re-subst'd) if the template changes. It's basically a totally different way of designing the doc page. (Static vs. dynamic.)
		+	::::::...buuuut, since I won't be the one having to update that page, I'll just acknowledge the issue is solved and mess with the next page :D scans recent changes for a victim
		+	:::::::[[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] 21:39, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 28 February 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::::Alright, all taken care of. Thanks for catching that, Jonpro.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:26, 27 February 2007 (CST)		::::Alright, all taken care of. Thanks for catching that, Jonpro.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:26, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::::And, while I'm here, to address Renegade's point there's a good and very obvious reason to fix it. The category is for "Articles actively undergoing a major edit" and clearly the Inuse template is not actively undergoing a major edit.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:28, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 28 February 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::::Actually, it's a fast and easy fix. and exactly the sort of thing that the "Subst:" function exists for.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:24, 27 February 2007 (CST)		::::Actually, it's a fast and easy fix. and exactly the sort of thing that the "Subst:" function exists for.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:24, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::Alright, all taken care of. Thanks for catching that, Jonpro.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:26, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 28 February 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::In other words: The template behaves exactly as it should do, and there's no way (and no reason) to fix that. Except, of course, removing the examples from the documentation.		:::In other words: The template behaves exactly as it should do, and there's no way (and no reason) to fix that. Except, of course, removing the examples from the documentation.
	::::[[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] 18:17, 27 February 2007 (CST)		::::[[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] 18:17, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::Actually, it's a fast and easy fix. and exactly the sort of thing that the "Subst:" function exists for.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 19:24, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 28 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:uhhh, interesting... I hadn't noticed. Well, I think it's just happening because the templates are being used to demonstrate. That can be fixed. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:46, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:uhhh, interesting... I hadn't noticed. Well, I think it's just happening because the templates are being used to demonstrate. That can be fixed. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:46, 27 February 2007 (CST)
	::pffft... I had every intention of fixing it... but when I looked at the code I didn't see what I had expected to see. Oh well... [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:48, 27 February 2007 (CST)		::pffft... I had every intention of fixing it... but when I looked at the code I didn't see what I had expected to see. Oh well... [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:48, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+	:::The problem is that the template includes another template which includes the original template. The category-tag is marked correctly as "include only", but the page then includes [[Template:Inuse/doc]], which in turn includes [[Template:Inuse]] for demonstration purposes - and since, on include, Inuse ''does'' include the category, both pages logically get categorized.
		+	:::In other words: The template behaves exactly as it should do, and there's no way (and no reason) to fix that. Except, of course, removing the examples from the documentation.
		+	::::[[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] 18:17, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 27 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:uhhh, interesting... I hadn't noticed. Well, I think it's just happening because the templates are being used to demonstrate. That can be fixed. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:46, 27 February 2007 (CST)		:uhhh, interesting... I hadn't noticed. Well, I think it's just happening because the templates are being used to demonstrate. That can be fixed. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:46, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+	::pffft... I had every intention of fixing it... but when I looked at the code I didn't see what I had expected to see. Oh well... [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:48, 27 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 27 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This is a small thing, but this page is in [[:Category:Articles actively undergoing a major edit]]. Unless this template is currently undergoing a major edit, it shouldn't be in that category.--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 14:58, 27 February 2007 (CST)		This is a small thing, but this page is in [[:Category:Articles actively undergoing a major edit]]. Unless this template is currently undergoing a major edit, it shouldn't be in that category.--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 14:58, 27 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:uhhh, interesting... I hadn't noticed. Well, I think it's just happening because the templates are being used to demonstrate. That can be fixed. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:46, 27 February 2007 (CST)