User talk:Tannhaus - Revision history

72.200.22.239 at 08:57, 9 May 2008

2008-05-09T08:57:19Z

Tannhaus: /* Tannhaus page */

2008-04-15T20:38:22Z

‎Tannhaus page

Tannhaus: /* Tannhaus page */

2008-04-15T20:21:51Z

‎Tannhaus page

Shiori: /* Tannhaus page */

2008-04-15T20:19:43Z

‎Tannhaus page

Shiori: /* Tannhaus page */

2008-04-15T20:19:35Z

‎Tannhaus page

Tannhaus: /* Tannhaus page */

2008-04-15T20:18:45Z

‎Tannhaus page

Shiori at 20:17, 15 April 2008

2008-04-15T20:17:32Z

Tannhaus at 05:37, 8 April 2007

2007-04-08T05:37:16Z

Tannhaus at 16:13, 7 December 2006

2006-12-07T16:13:30Z

OwenIsCool: Free Will

2006-12-07T04:51:54Z

Free Will

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
 :Awesome. Thanks! - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
-::No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article. In addition, since this is a nonfiction series, I think it should be established whether or not the person has any authority/experience to speak on the subjects. Of course, that's just my opinion. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 15:38, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
+::No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article. In addition, since this is a nonfiction series, I think it should be established whether or not the person has any authority/experience to speak on the subjects. Of course, that's just my opinion. At any rate, I hardly think two sentences constitutes a biography. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 15:38, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
 :Awesome. Thanks! - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
-::No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article.
+::No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article. In addition, since this is a nonfiction series, I think it should be established whether or not the person has any authority/experience to speak on the subjects. Of course, that's just my opinion. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 15:38, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 15 April 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.		That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
	:Awesome. Thanks! - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)		:Awesome. Thanks! - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
		+	::No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 15 April 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:

	That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.		That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
−	:Awesome. Thanks!	+	:Awesome. Thanks! - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 15 April 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:

	That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.		That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
		+	:Awesome. Thanks!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 15 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Tannhaus page==		==Tannhaus page==
	Tannhaus, the [[Tannhaus]] page is for the ''series'' Tannhaus, not your personal profile. That belongs on your user page. All it really needs is a background on what the series is about. Thanks for helping out! - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:17, 15 April 2008 (CDT)		Tannhaus, the [[Tannhaus]] page is for the ''series'' Tannhaus, not your personal profile. That belongs on your user page. All it really needs is a background on what the series is about. Thanks for helping out! - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:17, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:17, 15 April 2008
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	==Tannhaus page==
	+	Tannhaus, the [[Tannhaus]] page is for the ''series'' Tannhaus, not your personal profile. That belongs on your user page. All it really needs is a background on what the series is about. Thanks for helping out! - [[User:Shiori\|Shiori]] 15:17, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 8 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I am still strugling to understand how the so called Creators plan on drawing from Crowley without involving Thelema. If you read the statement they made "The religion we have created for this series is entirely fictional. It is as much related to fictional Christian cults and secret societies as it is to Thelema." it does not actually say it has nothing to do with Thelma. It only says that it draws from other influences as well as possibly Thelema. I know that Gemma said its not.......but we cannot really believe her. Now, I totally understand your point that a Thelamite would not force someone to do something (i have been reading up on free will).--[[User:Modelmotion\|modelmotion]] 13:09, 30 November 2006 (CST)

−	:Well, the real idea is that it is not a real religion. Yes, it borrows from Thelema (only in very vague ways..nothing actually said in the videos is very thelemic in anything but a very remote sense), but it also borrows from Christianity. It probably borrows from many other religions and secret societies as well. But, I don't think focussing on Thelema solely or even predominantly is the way to go about things. You might as well focus equally on the Plymouth Brethren (which might be a good place to start....since they DID mention Christian cults and the Plymouth Brethren could be considered cult-like in some aspects) since it was also alluded to at the bottom of the homepage right across from Thelema.
−
−	:Again though, trying to pin this on any one religion is an insult to that religion and its followers because of the criminal and dark aspects of the storyline. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 13:20, 30 November 2006 (CST)
−
−	~~== Free Will ==~~
−
−	Thanks for the addition to that article. I was doing some work on it earlier today, but I know little about [[Free Will]] outside of its lonelygirl15 context, so that was all I wrote about. It almost seemed kind of pointless to have it, but now it is a lot more valuable. I like it! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 22:51, 6 December 2006 (CST)
−
−	~~:Thanks. I'll probably be doing a lot of editing and correcting of stuff. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 10:13, 7 December 2006 (CST)~~
−
−	~~== The Book of the Law and Crowley ==~~
−
−	I separated the Book of the Law from Crowley. Adding all the information into Crowley's page just muddled everything together and made it harder to glean information. Separating them back into two different articles makes it easy to add information that explains the Book of the Law and its relation to Crowley. Crowley received the Book of the Law, but it's not just about him. So, I thought it fitting to keep the two separate a bit.
−
−	It is a work in progress that will take a day or two to flesh out. I'll be striving to make the articles on Aleister Crowley and the Book of the Law more readable and informative. As it was, the Aleister Crowley page was a hodge podge.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 7 December 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Thanks for the addition to that article. I was doing some work on it earlier today, but I know little about [[Free Will]] outside of its lonelygirl15 context, so that was all I wrote about. It almost seemed kind of pointless to have it, but now it is a lot more valuable. I like it! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 22:51, 6 December 2006 (CST)		Thanks for the addition to that article. I was doing some work on it earlier today, but I know little about [[Free Will]] outside of its lonelygirl15 context, so that was all I wrote about. It almost seemed kind of pointless to have it, but now it is a lot more valuable. I like it! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 22:51, 6 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	:Thanks. I'll probably be doing a lot of editing and correcting of stuff. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 10:13, 7 December 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	== The Book of the Law and Crowley ==
		+
		+	I separated the Book of the Law from Crowley. Adding all the information into Crowley's page just muddled everything together and made it harder to glean information. Separating them back into two different articles makes it easy to add information that explains the Book of the Law and its relation to Crowley. Crowley received the Book of the Law, but it's not just about him. So, I thought it fitting to keep the two separate a bit.
		+
		+	It is a work in progress that will take a day or two to flesh out. I'll be striving to make the articles on Aleister Crowley and the Book of the Law more readable and informative. As it was, the Aleister Crowley page was a hodge podge.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:51, 7 December 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Again though, trying to pin this on any one religion is an insult to that religion and its followers because of the criminal and dark aspects of the storyline. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 13:20, 30 November 2006 (CST)		:Again though, trying to pin this on any one religion is an insult to that religion and its followers because of the criminal and dark aspects of the storyline. --[[User:Tannhaus\|Tannhaus]] 13:20, 30 November 2006 (CST)
		+
		+	== Free Will ==
		+
		+	Thanks for the addition to that article. I was doing some work on it earlier today, but I know little about [[Free Will]] outside of its lonelygirl15 context, so that was all I wrote about. It almost seemed kind of pointless to have it, but now it is a lot more valuable. I like it! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 22:51, 6 December 2006 (CST)