Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tannhaus"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I am still strugling to understand how the so called Creators plan on drawing from Crowley without involving Thelema. If you read the statement they made "The religion we have created for this series is entirely fictional. It is as much related to fictional Christian cults and secret societies as it is to Thelema." it does not actually say it has nothing to do with Thelma.  It only says that it draws from other influences as well as possibly Thelema.  I know that Gemma said its not.......but we cannot really believe her.  Now, I totally understand your point that a Thelamite would not force someone to do something (i have been reading up on free will).--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 13:09, 30 November 2006 (CST)
+
==Tannhaus page==
 +
Tannhaus, the [[Tannhaus]] page is for the ''series'' Tannhaus, not your personal profile. That belongs on your user page. All it really needs is a background on what the series is about. Thanks for helping out! - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 15:17, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
  
−
:Well, the real idea is that it is not a real religion. Yes, it borrows from Thelema (only in very vague ways..nothing actually said in the videos is very thelemic in anything but a very remote sense), but it also borrows from Christianity. It probably borrows from many other religions and secret societies as well.  But, I don't think focussing on Thelema solely or even predominantly is the way to go about things. You might as well focus equally on the Plymouth Brethren (which might be a good place to start....since they DID mention Christian cults and the Plymouth Brethren could be considered cult-like in some aspects) since it was also alluded to at the bottom of the homepage right across from Thelema.
+
That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.
−
 
+
:Awesome. Thanks! - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
−
:Again though, trying to pin this on any one religion is an insult to that religion and its followers because of the criminal and dark aspects of the storyline. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 13:20, 30 November 2006 (CST)
+
::No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article. In addition, since this is a nonfiction series, I think it should be established whether or not the person has any authority/experience to speak on the subjects. Of course, that's just my opinion. At any rate, I hardly think two sentences constitutes a biography. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 15:38, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
−
 
+
−
== Free Will ==
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks for the addition to that article. I was doing some work on it earlier today, but I know little about [[Free Will]] outside of its lonelygirl15 context, so that was all I wrote about.  It almost seemed kind of pointless to have it, but now it is a lot more valuable.  I like it!  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 22:51, 6 December 2006 (CST)
+
−
 
+
−
:Thanks. I'll probably be doing a lot of editing and correcting of stuff. --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 10:13, 7 December 2006 (CST)
+
−
 
+
−
== The Book of the Law and Crowley ==
+
−
 
+
−
I separated the Book of the Law from Crowley.  Adding all the information into Crowley's page just muddled everything together and made it harder to glean information.  Separating them back into two different articles makes it easy to add information that explains the Book of the Law and its relation to Crowley.  Crowley received the Book of the Law, but it's not just about him.  So, I thought it fitting to keep the two separate a bit. 
+
−
 
+
−
It is a work in progress that will take a day or two to flesh out.  I'll be striving to make the articles on Aleister Crowley and the Book of the Law more readable and informative.  As it was, the Aleister Crowley page was a hodge podge.
+

Latest revision as of 08:57, 9 May 2008

Tannhaus page

Tannhaus, the Tannhaus page is for the series Tannhaus, not your personal profile. That belongs on your user page. All it really needs is a background on what the series is about. Thanks for helping out! - Shiori 15:17, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

That's what I'm trying to do... Regardless, I will add info and you guys can change it as you see fit. It doesn't matter to me one way or the other.

Awesome. Thanks! - Shiori 15:19, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
No problem. I figured it might make it easier for you guys if I added SOME info. I have no vested interest in this article either way: if it stays or goes, it won't bother me in the least. This is merely because I saw you guys having some problems with the article. In addition, since this is a nonfiction series, I think it should be established whether or not the person has any authority/experience to speak on the subjects. Of course, that's just my opinion. At any rate, I hardly think two sentences constitutes a biography. --Tannhaus 15:38, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
Retrieved from "http://www.lg15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=User_talk:Tannhaus&oldid=125646"