Difference between revisions of "Talk:Character Registry"
From LGPedia
Supasamurai (Talk | contribs) |
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My aim here is to put paint a picture of every character, cross website references, and list all relations, including actual and speculation. Am I doing something redundant currently? yes, because I just started watching. I need you all to fill in the gaps. Thanks[[User:Supasamurai|Supasamurai]] 02:10, 11 December 2006 (CST) | My aim here is to put paint a picture of every character, cross website references, and list all relations, including actual and speculation. Am I doing something redundant currently? yes, because I just started watching. I need you all to fill in the gaps. Thanks[[User:Supasamurai|Supasamurai]] 02:10, 11 December 2006 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It's good that you're trying to organize the content better, but I do think a lot of this information can probably be found off the page [[Canon]] which lists official, possibly official, and officially disavowed characters. Perhaps it would save you some work if you just added the links and website references to the [[Canon]] page... I'm not clear on what you had in mind, depending on how involved it was you might want to consider working on [[Canon]] instead. Hope that helps. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 09:42, 11 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 11 December 2006
My aim here is to put paint a picture of every character, cross website references, and list all relations, including actual and speculation. Am I doing something redundant currently? yes, because I just started watching. I need you all to fill in the gaps. ThanksSupasamurai 02:10, 11 December 2006 (CST)
- It's good that you're trying to organize the content better, but I do think a lot of this information can probably be found off the page Canon which lists official, possibly official, and officially disavowed characters. Perhaps it would save you some work if you just added the links and website references to the Canon page... I'm not clear on what you had in mind, depending on how involved it was you might want to consider working on Canon instead. Hope that helps. OwenIsCool 09:42, 11 December 2006 (CST)
