Difference between revisions of "Talk:Watcher 1"
From LGPedia
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:At this point I think these names stem from not having anything else to call the 3 guys flanking Lucy and Daniel. I say watcher is fine at this point cause Deacons are more than likely Watchers..but not all Watchers are Deacons. --[[User:LordGreystoke422|LordGreystoke422]] 18:21, 11 February 2007 (CST) | :At this point I think these names stem from not having anything else to call the 3 guys flanking Lucy and Daniel. I say watcher is fine at this point cause Deacons are more than likely Watchers..but not all Watchers are Deacons. --[[User:LordGreystoke422|LordGreystoke422]] 18:21, 11 February 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::ahh, makes sense. I added a section and an image to the [[Watcher]] article. I think it covers everything mentioned in the articles for Watchers 1, 2 and 3. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 19:43, 11 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 12 February 2007
Merge
I'm actually not sure whether to merge this into Watcher or The Deacons. Who's to say these three guys are not Deacons? Baldy McCreepy wore a suit and shades just like watchers do. Thoughts? OwenIsCool 18:06, 11 February 2007 (CST)
- At this point I think these names stem from not having anything else to call the 3 guys flanking Lucy and Daniel. I say watcher is fine at this point cause Deacons are more than likely Watchers..but not all Watchers are Deacons. --LordGreystoke422 18:21, 11 February 2007 (CST)
- ahh, makes sense. I added a section and an image to the Watcher article. I think it covers everything mentioned in the articles for Watchers 1, 2 and 3. OwenIsCool 19:43, 11 February 2007 (CST)
