Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sarah and the City"
From LGPedia
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
It is a sculpture. If it was the camera man, it would have arms up and also, it wouldn't be so far back because the scene is close to Sarah's face. [[User:Chelseyrl|Chelseyrl]] 13:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT) | It is a sculpture. If it was the camera man, it would have arms up and also, it wouldn't be so far back because the scene is close to Sarah's face. [[User:Chelseyrl|Chelseyrl]] 13:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Yea I was gonna say something about that. If that was the cameraman, he would be filming edge-on. (murdock_cb) | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 2 November 2007
can anyone REALLY see the camera guy in the vase?
to Me it looks like its just a bedpost of a sort...
- I thought that I saw it. But it could be a bedpost. I don't know. It's not really clear enough to figure out. -Greenie 10:12, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
- well, i've seen about 5 people say its a cameraman, so now i can't see it as anything else. he doesn't seem to move as far as i can tell though. --Milowent 10:13, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
- I would say they (yes, two) are people, for three simple reasons:
- Sarah's bed doesn't have bedposts
- If both were bedposts, their placement would make no sense at all
- If those are bedposts, they're gigantic
- I, personally, assume it's the camera man and a director.
- I would say they (yes, two) are people, for three simple reasons:
It is a sculpture. If it was the camera man, it would have arms up and also, it wouldn't be so far back because the scene is close to Sarah's face. Chelseyrl 13:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
- Yea I was gonna say something about that. If that was the cameraman, he would be filming edge-on. (murdock_cb)
