Difference between revisions of "Template talk:NewVid"
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) (we don't usually delete the talk pages of deleted articles, but rather keep them for reference) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Deletion == | == Deletion == | ||
| − | Sweet work with {{tl|Vid}}, [[User:Renegade|Renegade]]. I'm guessing the "number" field just got copied over from | + | Sweet work with {{tl|Vid}}, [[User:Renegade|Renegade]]. I'm guessing the "number" field just got copied over from Blog3 or something and was never taken out. Anyway, I like the faction and status fields and the "new" field... it makes things a little easier. So I vote "delete" I guess.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 21:26, 9 April 2007 (CDT) |
:Thanks...looks like no one else cares, and even [[Main Page/redesign]] was updated with the current stuff now...so delete it already :D | :Thanks...looks like no one else cares, and even [[Main Page/redesign]] was updated with the current stuff now...so delete it already :D | ||
::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 10:35, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 10:35, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:41, 27 May 2007
Faction and status
Okay, so we've been leaving the blogger out of the description on the Main Page because the blogger is provided with {{init}}. I'm wondering if we could do the same thing with faction and status. It appears that right now there are only two factions: "The Order" and "The Resistance" and two statuses: "Public Video" and "Private Video". If someone could develop something like {{init}} for these and figure out a way to add them to this template, that would be great. Sound like a good idea?--Jonpro 21:26, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
Deletion
Sweet work with {{Vid}}, Renegade. I'm guessing the "number" field just got copied over from Blog3 or something and was never taken out. Anyway, I like the faction and status fields and the "new" field... it makes things a little easier. So I vote "delete" I guess.--Jonpro 21:26, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
- Thanks...looks like no one else cares, and even Main Page/redesign was updated with the current stuff now...so delete it already :D
