Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Redearth88Actor"
From LGPedia
m (Template talk:MaddisonActor moved to Template talk:Redearth88Actor) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::Yeah, pretty much I want it the same as the normal actor template. All the info and whatnot. Just like.. aesthetically more similar to the MaddisonPerson template. I would assume.. (that makes the most sense, right?) --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 11:05, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ::::Yeah, pretty much I want it the same as the normal actor template. All the info and whatnot. Just like.. aesthetically more similar to the MaddisonPerson template. I would assume.. (that makes the most sense, right?) --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 11:05, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::: Okay, I took out the wikipedia field because I doubt any of them will have wikipedia pages, but I can add it back in if they do. I should also note that {{{role}}} is a badly named input. It basically just provides a caption to the image. --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 11:07, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::: LOL, that took me almost an hour instead of ten minutes. Okay, well, it turns out that mixing <nowiki><div> tags and the standard "|- colspan |" tables doesn't work so well. So I took out all the <div>'s and rebuilt it as a standard table. It's like GI Joe: now we know, and knowing is half the battle. If you're curious, the templates </nowiki>{{tl|!}} and {{tl|+}}<nowiki> are used to make the "|" and "|-" in tables. You have to use these templates to create a table with an IF statement, because otherwise the parser thinks that "|" is part of the IF statement and not part of the table.</nowiki> --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 11:46, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:31, 3 November 2007
Hey Zoey, if you give me, like, 10 minutes i can fix this. --JayHenry 10:41, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- Bless you!! =) Lol I shall leave it alone. Thanks a ton! --Zoey 10:43, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- I see that you just changed it to look like Template:Person with a different color scheme. Is that the design you want to go with? --JayHenry 10:47, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- Nah, that was essentially me giving up :P If you can make it look like MaddisonPerson but include all the info for actors, that would be WONDERFUL. --Zoey 10:49, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, I can do that. Did you have all the fields you wanted in the template? --JayHenry 10:52, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, pretty much I want it the same as the normal actor template. All the info and whatnot. Just like.. aesthetically more similar to the MaddisonPerson template. I would assume.. (that makes the most sense, right?) --Zoey 11:05, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- Okay, I took out the wikipedia field because I doubt any of them will have wikipedia pages, but I can add it back in if they do. I should also note that {{{role}}} is a badly named input. It basically just provides a caption to the image. --JayHenry 11:07, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- LOL, that took me almost an hour instead of ten minutes. Okay, well, it turns out that mixing <div> tags and the standard "|- colspan |" tables doesn't work so well. So I took out all the <div>'s and rebuilt it as a standard table. It's like GI Joe: now we know, and knowing is half the battle. If you're curious, the templates {{!}} and {{+}} are used to make the "|" and "|-" in tables. You have to use these templates to create a table with an IF statement, because otherwise the parser thinks that "|" is part of the IF statement and not part of the table. --JayHenry 11:46, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
