Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Book of Life"
From LGPedia
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) (delete?) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
what? what does dna have to do with anything? and isn't an article su[posed to be somewhat related ot it's title? what is the book of life? | what? what does dna have to do with anything? and isn't an article su[posed to be somewhat related ot it's title? what is the book of life? | ||
+ | |||
+ | :If you read the external link it uses the term book of life. Its a term that scientists used to describe DNA to the layman. The analogy comes from the fact that DNA is composed of a series of letters (nucleotides) and this series of letters is "read" by the transcription mechanism just like you would read a book. The tanscript is turned into proteins etc which are the building blooks of life. Hence DNS is commonlyas the Book of Life.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 00:50, 29 November 2006 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Agreed with the delete --[[User:Tannhaus|Tannhaus]] 23:05, 7 December 2006 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Delete''' Pointless article.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 13:04, 10 December 2006 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This article was been nominated for deletion over a week ago and everyone seems to agree it should go... can someone toss it? Thx. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 18:45, 16 December 2006 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 00:45, 17 December 2006
what? what does dna have to do with anything? and isn't an article su[posed to be somewhat related ot it's title? what is the book of life?
- If you read the external link it uses the term book of life. Its a term that scientists used to describe DNA to the layman. The analogy comes from the fact that DNA is composed of a series of letters (nucleotides) and this series of letters is "read" by the transcription mechanism just like you would read a book. The tanscript is turned into proteins etc which are the building blooks of life. Hence DNS is commonlyas the Book of Life.--modelmotion 00:50, 29 November 2006 (CST)
Agreed with the delete --Tannhaus 23:05, 7 December 2006 (CST)
Delete Pointless article.--Jonpro 13:04, 10 December 2006 (CST)
This article was been nominated for deletion over a week ago and everyone seems to agree it should go... can someone toss it? Thx. OwenIsCool 18:45, 16 December 2006 (CST)