Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kathulu Majik"

Revision as of 17:13, 1 December 2006

I really don't see how this deserves a link. There is no such thing as Kathulu magick and it's certainly not related to Aleister Crowley. That newsgroup post you saw was a joke. If you read the newsgroup post, you will see the post is from a professor at Miskatonic University. Of course, there is no Miskatonic University...it existed only in H.P. Lovecraft's writings. Someone was just typing up something and trying to amuse. --Tannhaus 21:02, 30 November 2006 (CST)

By nominating Necronomicon H.P. Lovecraft and Kathulu Majik for deletion Tannhaus clearly has an agenda of stamping out all free debate that he does not agree with. I have attempted to accommodate every point he has made in accordance with standard wiki procedures however this one sided approach is difficult to deal with. I think a discussion of both fictional and nonfictional topics that bear some relevance to the LG15 story line is worth debating. Writers not only draw on nonfiction for inspiration but also fiction. The Creators have stated that Bree's religion draws on a number of influences. I have attempted to research and document these in good faith and I do not think it would be fair if these substantial contributions are just discarded without appropriate discussion and debate of their relevance to potential future story lines. It should be remembered that the Creators want us to express where we would like the story to go and it seems to be that research into what has gone before in terms of story lines is highly relevant.

I think a discussion of both fictional and nonfictional topics that bear some relevance to the LG15 story line is worth debating. Writers not only draw on nonfiction for inspiration but also fiction.

I agree. However, I nominated these because there is virtually no relevance to the storyline. I really don't see a point in searching high and low until a piece of fanfiction is found to tie together totally incongruous subjects. If anything, it just muddies the waters and you can't tell what is fact, what is fiction, and what is fanfiction. Instead of providing something that is a tool, this incohesive lumping together just makes it a chore to wade through to glean any real information. In essence, so much information not related to the storyline is doctored up to appear to be related that we lose any sense of relation and are playing ten degrees of separation with every random webpage we find, no matter how dubious.

You can accuse me of what you wish, but by flagging the articles all I did was assure that a maintainer would look this way and decide the relevance. I've noticed you have a penchant for comparing everyone that doesn't agree with you to prison guards, etc. so I guess I should be pleased that you only accuse me of being a facist in the making. That doesn't change the fact that I haven't done anything but nominated what appear to be totally irrelevant articles for deletion - a matter to be decided by a wiki maintainer. --Tannhaus 05:04, 1 December 2006 (CST)

I agree with Tannhaus. Modelmotion -- this is not modelmotionpedia -- this is LGpedia. It is a community effort. Yet whenever anyone wants to change anything you've edited, you go ballistic. You resort to all sorts of ad hominem attacks and basically just complain until you get your way. This is extremely inappropriate behavior for the LGpedia. Modelmotion, you have been asked to be kinder to fellow LGpedians, and yet you refuse and continue to hurl insults to people who suggest changes. Tannhaus has the right to nominate an article for deletion -- so do you or any other registered user of the LGpedia. When somebody thinks something should be deleted we should discuss it as a community. But instead of mature discussion, all we have is you leveling personal attacks at people. I'm really frustrated with your bullying behavior.--JayHenry 11:13, 1 December 2006 (CST)