Difference between revisions of "Talk:Knights of the Round Table"
From LGPedia
Modelmotion (Talk | contribs) |
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I just dont see what harm the aritcle is going. She mentioned its not the Knighs of the Round table which raided the issue. A wiki works best with hyperlinked pages and that is what this is. We could just send users to Wikipedia all the time but then if we every want to generate revenue for the creators from google ads we would be sending away our traffic. Its a simple page. It state enought to explain who they are. It does exactly what needed, no more no less why why change it. --[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 15:53, 2 December 2006 (CST) | :I just dont see what harm the aritcle is going. She mentioned its not the Knighs of the Round table which raided the issue. A wiki works best with hyperlinked pages and that is what this is. We could just send users to Wikipedia all the time but then if we every want to generate revenue for the creators from google ads we would be sending away our traffic. Its a simple page. It state enought to explain who they are. It does exactly what needed, no more no less why why change it. --[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 15:53, 2 December 2006 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The article is not doing any harm; I just think it doesn't need to be a stand-alone article. Furthermore, there are no ads on the wiki, so I don't believe the creators make any money off the wiki, except through donations. We shouldn't sacrifice the organization of the wiki just to have more hyperlinks. I wasn't even suggesting that we link to Wikipedia, just that we move the content to another article of ours.[[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 16:08, 2 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 22:08, 2 December 2006
i really don't think this page is necessary.
hear hear!
- I disagree. Gemma mentioned them in her video and its important to get straight why she mentioned them and how they they are different form the "knight". Of course we could just direct pple to Wikipedia but since it involved something that related to LG its better to have it here.--modelmotion 21:53, 26 November 2006 (CST)
To me it just seems like too much of a stretch to make an article about this just because Gemma said "they operate a bit like an order of knights". She wasn't referring to any current or historical order of knights. Especially since the Email exchange with the creators, I think it's been clarified that this would be a made-up order anyway which would have nothing to do with the knights of the round table. Perhaps a short description about the Knights of the Round Table could be put into the Watcher article or in the Notes section of the vid where Gemma talks about it in lieu of this article. OwenIsCool 15:17, 2 December 2006 (CST)
- I just dont see what harm the aritcle is going. She mentioned its not the Knighs of the Round table which raided the issue. A wiki works best with hyperlinked pages and that is what this is. We could just send users to Wikipedia all the time but then if we every want to generate revenue for the creators from google ads we would be sending away our traffic. Its a simple page. It state enought to explain who they are. It does exactly what needed, no more no less why why change it. --modelmotion 15:53, 2 December 2006 (CST)
- The article is not doing any harm; I just think it doesn't need to be a stand-alone article. Furthermore, there are no ads on the wiki, so I don't believe the creators make any money off the wiki, except through donations. We shouldn't sacrifice the organization of the wiki just to have more hyperlinks. I wasn't even suggesting that we link to Wikipedia, just that we move the content to another article of ours.OwenIsCool 16:08, 2 December 2006 (CST)
