Difference between revisions of "User talk:194.80.32.8"
From LGPedia
(response) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::I understand, gentlemen. Clear explanations of the "whys" and "hows" of this lgpedia are still very new to me, so such clear explanations are very helpful. I can see now that my comments could be offensive and hurtful to this user. Feel free to edit any parts of my (wordy) comments, so as not to discourage this user from participating, since you have an approrpiate system in place for addressing serious acts of vandalism (which I now see that this was not). Thanks. [[User:Ogog|Ogog]] 10:19, 4 January 2007 (CST) | ::::I understand, gentlemen. Clear explanations of the "whys" and "hows" of this lgpedia are still very new to me, so such clear explanations are very helpful. I can see now that my comments could be offensive and hurtful to this user. Feel free to edit any parts of my (wordy) comments, so as not to discourage this user from participating, since you have an approrpiate system in place for addressing serious acts of vandalism (which I now see that this was not). Thanks. [[User:Ogog|Ogog]] 10:19, 4 January 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::I think your comments were acceptable, and as the creator of the HSAO (assuming you are; it's a spinoff I haven't followed as well as I'd have liked to) you certainly have an exceptional right to weigh in on matters regarding HSAO and the Greystoke keynote speech. It certainly doesn't preclude others from editing, but still, as for the bare facts of the matter? I'd think you'd be an authority, naturally. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 10:26, 4 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 16:26, 4 January 2007
- Welcome to LGPedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, or to experiment in the sandbox. However, unconstructive edits or page blanking is considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be temporarily blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. 71.245.65.248 09:08, 2 January 2007 (CST)
I personally wouldn't go so far as to say his/her first edit was "vandalism", but the second certainly was. I'm willing to leave it at a warning for the time being. If another admin feels differently and wants to ban this user, I won't take issue with it, though. --Brucker 12:55, 2 January 2007 (CST)
- Well, I just noticed a change to Lordgreystokes page that implied some false information. I reverted it back. This user seems to be bent on choosing to write insulting comments or entries that are untrue. The last change that I reverted stated that Greystoke pretended to be an HSAO participant and that HSAO is an official part of lg15. As the person behind HSAO, I know for a fact that this information is simply untrue. (Greystoke was asked to speak for HSAO and HSAO is not a part of lg15, just my spin-off.) It is such a shame that some people (this user in particular) want(s) to diminish the work of all the people who put effort into making this LGPedia a worthy endevour. Just because it is possible for anyone to edit and make changes, people (this user in particular?) really should not include speculation as fact or personal issues as fact. It seems pretty targeted. I am not sure if it this last entry was vandalism, but it did change confirmed facts into statements with the implication of trying to discrediting LordGreystoke. I really want to be more involved in editing and revising this LGPedia, but I seem to spend my time reverting thoughtless incidents of seemingly personal vendettas. I suggest banning this user. Ogog 07:08, 4 January 2007 (CST)
- While I understand Ogog's concerns, I'm having trouble seeing this user's edits as bannable vandalism. The language in the Lordgreystoke article is not very neutral or accurate, and I think many of this user's edits were an improvement. After being slapped on the wrists for calling Greystoke a knob of cheese, this user appears (to me at least) to be editing in good faith.--JayHenry 09:02, 4 January 2007 (CST)
- I'm with you on this. I'd characterize the innacuracies in the edit to be either carelessness or exaggeration. This user should be watched carefully, no doubt, but I don't see anything done so far as overtly malicious. --Brucker 09:21, 4 January 2007 (CST)
- I understand, gentlemen. Clear explanations of the "whys" and "hows" of this lgpedia are still very new to me, so such clear explanations are very helpful. I can see now that my comments could be offensive and hurtful to this user. Feel free to edit any parts of my (wordy) comments, so as not to discourage this user from participating, since you have an approrpiate system in place for addressing serious acts of vandalism (which I now see that this was not). Thanks. Ogog 10:19, 4 January 2007 (CST)
- I think your comments were acceptable, and as the creator of the HSAO (assuming you are; it's a spinoff I haven't followed as well as I'd have liked to) you certainly have an exceptional right to weigh in on matters regarding HSAO and the Greystoke keynote speech. It certainly doesn't preclude others from editing, but still, as for the bare facts of the matter? I'd think you'd be an authority, naturally. --Brucker 10:26, 4 January 2007 (CST)
