Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theories About Characters"
Rumplemima (Talk | contribs) |
(→Clean Up?) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I agree... we also know that it's unlikely Kate was a Ceremony girl, since we saw what happens in ceremonies. --Greenie | I agree... we also know that it's unlikely Kate was a Ceremony girl, since we saw what happens in ceremonies. --Greenie | ||
:As a matter of fact, Greenie, it's impossible that Kate was a Ceremony girl, let alone Charlie. <span style="background:DarkSlateGray">[[User:SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white"> '''•Silver•''' </font>]] <small>[[User talk:SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white">Contribs</font>]]</small></span> 23:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT) | :As a matter of fact, Greenie, it's impossible that Kate was a Ceremony girl, let alone Charlie. <span style="background:DarkSlateGray">[[User:SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white"> '''•Silver•''' </font>]] <small>[[User talk:SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white">Contribs</font>]]</small></span> 23:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | agreed again. we should seperate the open theories from the theories that have been closed through confirmation or denied. - [[user:platypusrex256|platy]] sep 23 | ||
== Disproven Theories? == | == Disproven Theories? == |
Revision as of 03:35, 24 September 2007
Contents
Theories?
I really like a page for character theories, but I get the feeling some of the "theories" here are just fan speculation. Any thoughts? --Pheon 17:58, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, a lot of the theories have no proof. Like the one that said Charlie might have had an abortion - why? Perhaps the page could be set up a similar way the "theories page" on the Heroes Wiki is? (http://heroeswiki.com/Theories:People) where people say their theory, citations from videos, and notes?Babygurl1853 22:03, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
- I made the theories page and my idea was to make it just like the heroeswiki but i don't know how. --jonas'brother
Clean Up?
I don't know if this matters, and I don't know how to do it... but shouldn't we remove the speculation about characters leaving the messages in the bree blogs, since we know who it is now? And also, it's not really a theory anymore that Alex was the woman in the deep throat video...
I agree... we also know that it's unlikely Kate was a Ceremony girl, since we saw what happens in ceremonies. --Greenie
- As a matter of fact, Greenie, it's impossible that Kate was a Ceremony girl, let alone Charlie. •Silver• Talk | Contribs 23:42, 11 August 2007 (CDT)
agreed again. we should seperate the open theories from the theories that have been closed through confirmation or denied. - platy sep 23
Disproven Theories?
If a theory is disproven, should it be removed from the list?Babygurl1853 22:03, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
- If a theory is disproven, just but "disproven" next to it in parathesis (i spelled that wrong lol) --jonas'brother
- and why does it say that the theory that jonas and bree have the same parents is disproven? when was it disproven? --jonas'brother
Theories about spin-off characters?
Perhaps a page could be made for people to post their theories on fanfic/ARG characters? I think it'd be interesting to see what people had to say. Babygurl1853 22:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
What exactly is this page for?
I've got a theory, but I id thid page just for anyone with an idea, or does the theory have to have public opion behind it?
reasons
Some of these theories are either really stupid (like the idea that Kate is really Cassie - what, so Kate went to high school with Daniel and Bree and was in California last year to stalk them?) or are sort of interesting but lack proof (like the theory that Charlie was once pregnant and lost her baby). In all cases, though, I would really appreciate some explanation of the theory, so that we can research, discuss, prove, or disprove the theories. What do you think? --Katiej88 22:17, 12 September 2007 (CDT)