Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rosemary's Baby"
From LGPedia
Modelmotion (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
What's so bad about a picture of Aleister Crowley? He was a holy man. | What's so bad about a picture of Aleister Crowley? He was a holy man. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I did not say he was a bad man (wikipedia might call him the wickeded man alive but thats their opinion). What i said is that he wrote Moonchild and there are similarities between that and Rosemary's baby. Given all the occult references in LG its quite possible the similarity is significant and hence the page is a valid contribution to LGpedia. I personally hope that the story does develop in that direction but only time will tell.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 18:10, 20 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 00:10, 21 November 2006
This rosemary's baby suggestion has been raised on an off a few times, but it seems kind of outlandish to merit its own lgpedia page. just sayin . . . . --Milowent 15:56, 20 November 2006 (CST)
- Anyone who put a picture of Aleister Crowley on her bedroom wall if capable of just about anything. Given how the plot of the movie seem to be similar to Moonchild i dont think its so outlandish!!!--modelmotion 15:58, 20 November 2006 (CST)
What's so bad about a picture of Aleister Crowley? He was a holy man.
I did not say he was a bad man (wikipedia might call him the wickeded man alive but thats their opinion). What i said is that he wrote Moonchild and there are similarities between that and Rosemary's baby. Given all the occult references in LG its quite possible the similarity is significant and hence the page is a valid contribution to LGpedia. I personally hope that the story does develop in that direction but only time will tell.--modelmotion 18:10, 20 November 2006 (CST)
