Difference between revisions of "User talk:OwenIsCool"
(Hey Owen) |
(→Hey Owen) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Thanks for all the good edits. It's always refreshing to have another good editor on the LGpedia. Big thanks for the heads up about the [[Phorum 3]] -- so weird that such a random page would get hit.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 11:20, 1 December 2006 (CST) | Thanks for all the good edits. It's always refreshing to have another good editor on the LGpedia. Big thanks for the heads up about the [[Phorum 3]] -- so weird that such a random page would get hit.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 11:20, 1 December 2006 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks for your help on the vandalism stuff. To tell you the truth, when I see spam vandalism by an unregistered user, I check their contribution history, and if it's the first time they've put in an edit, I assume it's probably a post-and-run spammer who won't be back and don't bother giving them a warning. I don't think anything's likely to happen beyond a warning unless they are a repeat offender. If they are a genuine troublemaker, they'd probably get blocked from editing. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 12:39, 1 December 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:39, 1 December 2006
Thanks for contributing to the LGpedia.. Thank you especially for working on the Creators' pet project: The Story So Far... If you take issue with the credibility of some of the information provided in the article, you can edit in references and citations to more hard facts if you prefer. If you can't verify a particular piece of information, question the contributor on their talk page, or the talk page for The Story So Far... What elements of the article do currently find questionable? -- Twjaniak 22:09, 18 November 2006 (PST)
Hi, thanks for writing back. I was referring to the Watcher article, not The Story So Far.... I'm sorry if I said something confusing or posted the wrong link somehow. I only started watching the series recently, so I've been trying my hand just updating more recent articles and changing minor things on old articles. There are several references on the Watcher article to the Deacons (commenter) posts and to external websites of questionable veracity (in particular a Geocities website that looks really sketch, for lack of a better word). I moved those under a heading called "Unofficial fan research", but I'm wary of deleting anything because, well, who am I to start junking what other people write? I'm a little worried that the article is starting to become controversial because another anonymous user made some wise-cracking edits because they were skeptical about the content. I'm skeptical about some stuff too, but I was trying to preserve neutrality, so I gave everything a fair chance... but I don't know where to go from here... Thanks for your help =) OwenIsCool 23:24, 21 November 2006 (CST)
Re: Gemma Note
Alright, that was merely confusion on my part. I thought corner booth meant the corner booth at a bathroom, it could also mean the corner booth near the bathroom in the restaurant. Nice catch. - FireInside 22:19, 28 November 2006 (CST)
tag page
Lonelygirl15 (tag) is a completely unnecessary page. While I think every tag should have a page, I don't think it needs a page separate for the tag itself. --Brucker 15:58, 30 November 2006 (CST)
Hey Owen
Thanks for all the good edits. It's always refreshing to have another good editor on the LGpedia. Big thanks for the heads up about the Phorum 3 -- so weird that such a random page would get hit.--JayHenry 11:20, 1 December 2006 (CST)
Thanks for your help on the vandalism stuff. To tell you the truth, when I see spam vandalism by an unregistered user, I check their contribution history, and if it's the first time they've put in an edit, I assume it's probably a post-and-run spammer who won't be back and don't bother giving them a warning. I don't think anything's likely to happen beyond a warning unless they are a repeat offender. If they are a genuine troublemaker, they'd probably get blocked from editing. --Brucker 12:39, 1 December 2006 (CST)