Difference between revisions of "Talk:Proving Science Wrong (series)"
From LGPedia
(Poor Pluto) |
(→Poor Pluto) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think [[Poor Pluto]] ''is'' part of the series. Do we need to call it to a vote? --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 11:48, 3 November 2006 (PST) | I think [[Poor Pluto]] ''is'' part of the series. Do we need to call it to a vote? --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 11:48, 3 November 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :How is this Proving Science Wrong? Bree even says, "'''''instead''''' of proving science wrong we're gonna help pluto adjust..." And, more importantly, she doesn't address any scientific theory (Pluto is not a scientific theory, it's a planet) and she doesn't prove anything wrong. So there's 1) no proof 2) no science 3) nothing is wrong and 4) Bree says it's not proving science wrong. I think that's a pretty compelling case. Clearly belongs in the category of vids where she talks about science related topics, but it's also clearly not PSW.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 15:44, 3 November 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 23:44, 3 November 2006
Poor Pluto
I think Poor Pluto is part of the series. Do we need to call it to a vote? --Brucker 11:48, 3 November 2006 (PST)
- How is this Proving Science Wrong? Bree even says, "instead of proving science wrong we're gonna help pluto adjust..." And, more importantly, she doesn't address any scientific theory (Pluto is not a scientific theory, it's a planet) and she doesn't prove anything wrong. So there's 1) no proof 2) no science 3) nothing is wrong and 4) Bree says it's not proving science wrong. I think that's a pretty compelling case. Clearly belongs in the category of vids where she talks about science related topics, but it's also clearly not PSW.--JayHenry 15:44, 3 November 2006 (PST)
