Talk:Freemason
From LGPedia
Revision as of 20:35, 3 December 2006 by OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs)
This article is inflammatory and does nothing but attack Freemasons. I am not a Freemason. But, the rituals of freemasonry have been published. It's easy enough to get a copy of Albert Pike's "Morals and Dogma" to see that this person's "comment" is complete rubbish.
I definitely don't think a comment should be added to a lgpedia page unless it contributes significantly to the article. This comment in no way does and is inflammatory/nonfactual.--Tannhaus 14:23, 3 December 2006 (CST)
- I don't know anything about Freemasonry, but I am skeptical about quoting comments from the boards or citing them as sources. They are not definitive sources of information on anything like this. You should edit out that part of the article if you think it's wrong; ideally you would replace it with something quoted from the book you mentioned, but I don't want to burden you with that. OwenIsCool 14:35, 3 December 2006 (CST)