Difference between revisions of "Talk:All Wet"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Yep. Daniel doesn't seem to be phased by Sarah's video, forum posts, or Myspace blogs. And I'm just curious of how many guys thought they were going to be seeing Sarah in a bathing suit or something (after seeing the title) --[[User:Demented Llama|Demented Llama]] 02:34, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
 
:Yep. Daniel doesn't seem to be phased by Sarah's video, forum posts, or Myspace blogs. And I'm just curious of how many guys thought they were going to be seeing Sarah in a bathing suit or something (after seeing the title) --[[User:Demented Llama|Demented Llama]] 02:34, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
 
::Honestly, I did consider it for a moment before I clicked to play it (Hey, I AM a guy :P), but I WAS hoping this wasn't going to be a filler vid, so I'm relatively happy there wasn't any redundant flirting. --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 02:46, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
 
::Honestly, I did consider it for a moment before I clicked to play it (Hey, I AM a guy :P), but I WAS hoping this wasn't going to be a filler vid, so I'm relatively happy there wasn't any redundant flirting. --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 02:46, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
 +
:::I'm a girl and it even crossed my mind (obviously), and I wouldn't be too thrilled to see a sarcastic Sarah in a two-piece over a sarcastic Sarah throwing important information in the water. At least the plot seems to be moving at a rate that is faster then Jonas snogging Bree and everyone picking on him because of the after effects. --[[User:Demented Llama|Demented Llama]] 02:55, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
  
 
==Sarah Sarcasm==
 
==Sarah Sarcasm==

Revision as of 07:55, 7 July 2007

Looks like there's some trouble in paradise? Hmm? --Chartreuse 01:42, 7 July 2007 (CDT)

Yep. Daniel doesn't seem to be phased by Sarah's video, forum posts, or Myspace blogs. And I'm just curious of how many guys thought they were going to be seeing Sarah in a bathing suit or something (after seeing the title) --Demented Llama 02:34, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
Honestly, I did consider it for a moment before I clicked to play it (Hey, I AM a guy :P), but I WAS hoping this wasn't going to be a filler vid, so I'm relatively happy there wasn't any redundant flirting. --Pheon 02:46, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
I'm a girl and it even crossed my mind (obviously), and I wouldn't be too thrilled to see a sarcastic Sarah in a two-piece over a sarcastic Sarah throwing important information in the water. At least the plot seems to be moving at a rate that is faster then Jonas snogging Bree and everyone picking on him because of the after effects. --Demented Llama 02:55, 7 July 2007 (CDT)

Sarah Sarcasm

  • Seriously, that latest note is just way to speculative. Sure, half the things Sarah says are sarcastic, but claiming it in this case just seems too out there. Any thoughts? --Pheon 02:18, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
    • She did seem rather sarcastic. And if they had to do all that work to find the place and find those papers, it would seem unlikely that she would be nonchalant about almost ruining a potentially important piece of evidence involving Gilman. She could have done it just to push Daniel away though. But knowing all the "twists" we've seen so far, my vote is that she's with the Order. I don't know if you were trying to go that far with your speculations but it's definately a theory that has been thrown out there since she first appeared. I didn't want to admit it, since I rather liked the comic relief from Sarah's character, but she's as evil as the orange in 711's slurpees. --Demented Llama 02:31, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
      • I don't know . . . maybe its the wording or something. With these notes, sometimes the theory sounded reasonably based, and other times they seem off the wall. I for one know that Sarah & Taylor have been considered HoO since they first arived (and that Slide Tackle video didn't help much), and I'm fine with those theories, its just that the note seemed out there. But again, maybe some better wording will help it out (I mean, you get the idea that the note-writer isn't even too sure of the connection or something). --Pheon 02:43, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
        • Now see! That newly edited note sounds tons better (Though a link to the forum, where their discussing this could help)! Sorry for be so OCD-ish, guys . . . .--Pheon 02:48, 7 July 2007 (CDT)
          • I agree. I would say we remove that comment and put something along the lines of, "Sarah seems a bit sarcastic when she apologizes at the end of this video. It has been speculated that she dropped the papers on purpose, but this may not be the case." How's that? --Katiej88 02:50, 7 July 2007 (CDT)