Talk:Bree's November 28 chat

Who can get a log?

As I said, I don't chat, so I don't know how it works. Does it have to be an admin? Does it have to be twjaniak? Or can it be anyone?--Brucker 09:48, 28 November 2006 (CST)

Separate log page?

Maybe I spoke too soon, sort of. Maybe this should be the more public page for discussion, and there should be a page called "Bree's November 28 chat log" that is uneditable. Thoughts? --Brucker 09:50, 28 November 2006 (CST)

There are so many unknows about this chat its hard to say. I belive they are not using userplane so it might depend on what platform they end up using. The safest thing is the have the site programmer generate a chat log and then pass it onto an LGpedia admin for inspection. I think that would be the simplest approach.--modelmotion 11:15, 28 November 2006 (CST)

World Domination.

yes, but the problem is whose world?--modelmotion 19:06, 28 November 2006 (CST)

Wow, I was really disappointed that I wasn't able to make the chat... but now it seems like I wouldn't have been able to process it anyway. Ok, on to business. I agree with the suggestion that there should be a page that is solely the log (uneditable), but it should clearly link to another page that pares down the chat to only the relevant lines, or summarizes what happened. The log is othewise unreadable because of the barrage of random unrelated comments by that 'multitude' of users. Once the transcript is up (and approved, if need be) I wouldn't mind helping to make it more reader-friendly. It would probably take many many edits though... OwenIsCool

yeah, that's what i was thinking. we could have an uneditable transcript of the whole thing, just for information's sake, and then have a page summarizing all the different suggestions and the pros and cons put forth.

ok, I see most of the log is up (if not all)... but I can hardly understand what's going on in it. I seems like the characters say "hi" and "thanks" to a couple of people that were giving ideas and then they start saying goodbye and leaving. Are we missing a lot of the actual transcript? OwenIsCool 17:10, 29 November 2006 (CST)

I assume someone does have access to an official log, right? It does seem like this current version is missing some of the stuff that was relayed to my room. --Milowent 07:44, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Its missing at least the first 10-15 min because I could not get into the chat session. It was originally suggested that it would be better of the people programming the chat log it but with the last minute changes in platform i am not sure if that happened. I just did the best i could under the circumstances by cutting a pasting from the chat but the circumstances were less than perfect! Lets hope everyone has learned a lesson and we do it better next time:)--modelmotion 14:32, 30 November 2006 (CST)

The sections that are presented are complete and accurate logs of those sections but it is not the complete log as clearly stated at the top of the page.--modelmotion 14:33, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Transcript

Has a better version of the transcript been posted at the phorum? I can't make heads or tails of this -- we can't leave it in the wikipedia like this.--JayHenry 13:30, 7 December 2006 (CST)

Jay, i agree but we might have too...--------Iris2009

Sections 4 and 5

Sections 4 and 5 are definitely ones that overlap. Would it be okay to merge them? There are several lines that are clearly the same at the end of 4 and the beginning of 5. Why not stick them together? --Katiej88 09:59, 23 July 2008 (CDT)