Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jules"
From LGPedia
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
nikki's reason were all rather ludicrous, so i took it as a joke... until i saw jules's vids.--[[User:24.19.3.231|24.19.3.231]] 19:16, 17 April 2007 (CDT) | nikki's reason were all rather ludicrous, so i took it as a joke... until i saw jules's vids.--[[User:24.19.3.231|24.19.3.231]] 19:16, 17 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | :A theory going around is that there will be "potential" girls. The theory is on Bree's response vid to Nikki's vid. --[[user: Nieriel.Manwathiel|Nieriel.Manwathiel]] | ||
Revision as of 02:21, 18 April 2007
If Canon...
If she is canon, I hope she improves her acting over time. Chelseyrl 23:31, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
- Interestingly, most of the commenters on YouTube are more concerned that she might be a cannon. --JayHenry 23:34, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
- It's just so horrible. The acting burns my soul XP--Demented Llama 14:03, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
Hahahaha that's funny. So I know that Nikki B./Ali D. is friends with the Creators, so can we trust this as being completely true? Chelseyrl 23:37, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
- Right now, I'm not believing anything for sure. But if I had to guess, I would say she's probably canon. Mainly because of the reference in the Nikki B. video, but also because of the editing style, etc. I could be wrong though....--Jonpro 23:42, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
- I agree with Jonpro. My guess is yes, but we can't say for sure that she's canon yet, which is why the article reads "Nikki Bower identified her as..." They like to drag these things out. Gemma and Jonas both made a handful of videos before being confirmed as canon. --JayHenry 23:45, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
nikki's reason were all rather ludicrous, so i took it as a joke... until i saw jules's vids.--24.19.3.231 19:16, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
- A theory going around is that there will be "potential" girls. The theory is on Bree's response vid to Nikki's vid. --Nieriel.Manwathiel
