Talk:List of New Girl Candidates/Sandbox

{{{title}}} This talk page contains one or more discussions that have not yet been resolved. Feel free to add your own comment to these discussion(s) or remove this template once the discussion(s) have been resolved.

I noticed that the List of possible New Girls" page was nominated for deletion, and I thought that instead of getting rid of all that information, there could be a page simular to Cassie UGC for it. Feel free to edit this, but please don't remove large amounts of information from the page, as it took me a good part of the day to construct this :P. Some of the summaries are incomplete, so feel free to add info where you see fit. (The blurbs shouldn't be much longer than what's already in Flowersinmyhat's section). Anyway, Is this a good idea? Or did I just waste a chunk of my time :P --FH14 18:03, 24 March 2008 (EST)

Nice job! This is actually ridiculously similar to how I was going to put this together, you just beat me to it. :P I do think this should end up remaining on the List of New Girl Candidates page, though. (Only the lower section was supposed to be tagged as to show that it needs clipped/trimmed/whatever.) - Shiori 17:23, 24 March 2008 (CDT)

Really? I thought "List of New Girl Candidates" was too... (looks in thesaurus) er.. (throws away thesaurus) um... open-ended? I mean, it implies that a canon one hasn't been found yet. But that's just me and my nouroticness (gah! I can't spell today!) --FH14 18:34, 24 March 2008 (EST)

You have a point. Time to poll other people as to what the title should be! (UGC doesn't work, though, since Jules and Taylor were both C-created...) - Shiori 18:22, 24 March 2008 (CDT)

Re: my own point up there^. We should probably leave the page name as-is until the first phase of the fanfic revamp is done, at the very least. Moving things around before its structure is cemented is just begging for trouble. - Shiori 18:29, 24 March 2008 (CDT)

True. I named it "New Girl UGC" because it had a sense of uniformality (i.e. Cassie UGC) and because "List of New Girl Candidates" makes it sound like the new girl has yet to be revealed. --FH14 April 14, 2008

Okay, from what I understand it looks like this page has been agreed upon... but is waiting to be finished and implemented. Is this correct? If so, I'll go ahead and remove it from the "active discussion," so we can tidy that up a bit. --Zoey 11:07, 21 April 2008 (CDT)

Reevaluation

I know this page hasn't been touched in a while (partially my fault, as I'm the one creating many of these sandbox pages), but I'd just like to propose something. As the fanfic revamp seems to be falling through, I'd like to reevaluate the new girl section. No, I am not proposing that we keep all the pages we have for them currently, as some of them have only posted one or two videos (Emilyoats, Ponyprincess72, Schneidz124) and others have deactivated their accounts (chrysplanet, Hymnofone, Rejected92). However, a a couple I believe merit more than to be simply listed on this page. Out of all of them, IMO, flowersonmyhat in the only one who merits the amount of pages she currently has, as her account remains open, she has a fair amount of videos, and is fairly popular. True, the series has ended, but she took the time to finish the series whereas the other girls seemed to give up and abandon their stories. Two of the other girls, LOSTchild17 and LucaSambuca87, I believe merit a single page because they still have their accounts open, have a fair number of videos. Thoughts? --FH14 13 August 2008 (EST)

I would agree, and maybe I do, I don't know. But since they've technically go this page already, why do they need pages? I understand that some of them deserve pages, but they'd get, what, two paragraphs more than they have now? I don't see why some girls can't just have more information in their sections on this page than others. (I'm really not opposed to the separate pages idea, I just don't see why it's needed. I'd probably be more behind having their "pages" redirect to their sections on this one.) Now, if the proposal behind the pages is more to have transcripts and video lists, I'm going to naysay that the whole way. - Shiori 10:55, 31 August 2008 (CDT)