Difference between revisions of "Talk:The park"

Revision as of 21:03, 16 May 2007

This page should definitely--Skeeta 02:47, 13 December 2006 (CST) go.

See objections on the main page!--modelmotion 19:36, 15 November 2006 (PST)

Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the In The Park video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of Cassieiswatching or In The Park. I feel that this article warrants deletion. Redirects from The Park and Park could lead to the video's page instead. -- Twjaniak 06:01, 16 November 2006 (PST)

Ok, this is clearly a template objection. Just because a page only has a few picture at the moment does not mean it will not contain more useful information in the fututre. The idea is to has a structure that promotes development, not to burn down the kingdom. The attack on the locations section without due consideration of the reason it was created and sturcutred is just annoying.--modelmotion 06:08, 16 November 2006 (PST)

And pages that sit around and never get expanded upon can be annoying too. This happens alot on the LGpedia and it's a problem. What should have been done was to create a generic Locations page. All of the locations could then have stub information added to its own section of that page. If a section grows too large, then that information could be extracted and placed into its own page, such would be the case for Lucy's appartment. -- Twjaniak 06:27, 16 November 2006 (PST)

this page is more relevant than a lot of location pages. as opposed to, say, the motel, we really don't know what's going on here. there's still speculation going on. don't delete this page.--Skeeta 02:47, 13 December 2006 (CST)

I prefer the current organisation. I have been busy working on other sections but that does not mean the original structure was wrong. i believe its the best solution and I have recently added information to a number of the pages and will plan to continue with future location. If you don't want my contributions on this wiki then just say so. I have better things to do with my time than go back on forth on this issue. As far as i am concerned its all or nothing and the current structure makes it easy for me to add links to the video pages and elsewhere as needed. --modelmotion 06:37, 16 November 2006 (PST)

Further, let me repeat that this attack on the location secion is destroying my enjoyment of Lonelygirl15. I feel that the LGpedia is becoming a tryany of the few rather than a source of enjoyment for the many.--modelmotion 06:39, 16 November 2006 (PST)

Also, i would like the deletion tags to be revoveD from all the location pages ASAP.--modelmotion 06:40, 16 November 2006 (PST)

What's going on with this "an expansion or major revamping?"--modelmotion 23:06, 20 November 2006 (CST)

Firefox really hates the formating on here. I'm guessing that the perfered browser is IE.--Killthesmiley 04:42, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Lol, ok, Firefox hates the big pictures, and my IE hates your formatting (it looks all jumbled up and not spaced out enough). Take a look at the gallery that JayHenry suggested at Talk:Daniel's bedroom. Is this something that would work with your browser/resolution? I dunno, check it out and let's see if that works for everyone. OwenIsCool 12:35, 1 February 2007 (CST)

yea i've been playing with that with the drop articles over in the aphidpedia. I like it...lots!!!! I'm going to re-do it with this page. Just a simple set up, people can fix it afterwards.--Killthesmiley 13:28, 1 February 2007 (CST) (the edit right before this was posted was me

Yay, solution! It looks fine on my computer too. As for the content of the page, I'm not sure the current template is helping or hurting. Maybe a top- or bottom-aligned would organize things a little better? OwenIsCool 14:12, 1 February 2007 (CST)

In all honesty, the template annoyed the CRAP out of me when editing. It simply go in the way with the gallery. The galleries with the locations should be on top, in my opinion, so the reader can see off the back that there are images to go with the imnformation--Killthesmiley 14:16, 1 February 2007 (CST)

I just made some major overhauls of this page. I think it looks great, it's well-written, and it's time to take the cleanup tag off. Feel free to put it back on if need be. silverX3 20:05, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

Cleanup Still Apply?

Does the cleanup tag still apply to this page with Misty's edits? What more are people looking for here? --Zoey 20:28, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

• Not to be the correcting type, but those were actually my edits. :) silverX3 16:03, 16 May 2007 (CDT)