Talk:The swimming hole
I stongly disagree the notion that location pages should be deleted. Location play a vital role in the plot development and should be included in LGpedia. Further, clues often lie within the nature of the location and hence they provide a focal point for discussions.--modelmotion 18:58, 15 November 2006 (PST)
- Modelmotion, would you please read my points in the discussion at Talk:Main Page. Nobody is saying the information should be deleted. We are saying that the locations do not need separate pages. We are not removing locations from LGPedia, we are simply organizing them in a way that makes sense. Please continue the discussion at Talk:Main Page unless you have particular points to add about the Swimming Hole as deserving of its own page.--JayHenry 19:03, 15 November 2006 (PST)
Due to a lack of plot elements that this location provides, as opposed to the Swimming! video, I believe these photos should be included as thumbnails on the video's page. This article currently offers no useful information, and anything that could be added is already covered under the topics of Cassieiswatching or Swimming!. I feel that this article warrants deletion. Redirects from Swimming Hole could lead to the video's page instead. This is how the such issues are frequently handled on the WIkiPedia. -- Twjaniak 05:57, 16 November 2006 (PST)
- This does not really work for me because it does not provide a page where fact that appear about the location can be added. Where is it, what is the significance of the location, what else has happened there, etc etc etc.....There are a lot of ways these pages could develop if left alone and I do not feel I should have to defend them on a one by one basis. The central idea is that we keep a list of location pages where users can fill in addional information, add screen shots, discusss signicafant factors. I think that concpet works very very very well and should be left alone. --modelmotion 06:05, 16 November 2006 (PST)
What's going on with this "an expansion or major revamping?"--modelmotion 23:03, 20 November 2006 (CST)
Merge with "Hiking trails"
Does anyone object to me merging this with "Hiking Trails". It's already mentioned on that page, it might make sense just to have the info directly on there and then have this page redirect to hiking trails. What do people think? --Zoey 23:56, 16 May 2007 (CDT)