Difference between revisions of "User talk:SilverBULLETx3"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wondering Why)
m (Protected "User talk:SilverBULLETx3": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 103: Line 103:
  
 
Also, I'm wondering why you've been redirecting all these images recently. I know we had agreed to do it for images that were listed on the "List of Videos" page, but you've been doing it for everything... normal video images... location page images... why? It makes everything harder to keep track of... harder to see what images have been categorized and what haven't... harder to read any image descriptions or whatever, etc. Plus, plenty of times images are used in more than one place, and if they redirect to a certain page, it may not take you to the page you want to go to. And.. also, it's a lot harder when trying to snag an image for use on a page if you have to go to the page they redirect to, then unredirect yourself back to the image and snag the URL, etc. I just have no clue what the benefit of redirecting everything would be, and it's kind of been making my life a lot harder since you've been doing it, so I was wondering if you didn't have good reason for doing so, could you please stop? Thanks. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 20:02, 7 November 2007 (CST)
 
Also, I'm wondering why you've been redirecting all these images recently. I know we had agreed to do it for images that were listed on the "List of Videos" page, but you've been doing it for everything... normal video images... location page images... why? It makes everything harder to keep track of... harder to see what images have been categorized and what haven't... harder to read any image descriptions or whatever, etc. Plus, plenty of times images are used in more than one place, and if they redirect to a certain page, it may not take you to the page you want to go to. And.. also, it's a lot harder when trying to snag an image for use on a page if you have to go to the page they redirect to, then unredirect yourself back to the image and snag the URL, etc. I just have no clue what the benefit of redirecting everything would be, and it's kind of been making my life a lot harder since you've been doing it, so I was wondering if you didn't have good reason for doing so, could you please stop? Thanks. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 20:02, 7 November 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== Marla Singer ==
 +
 +
Just so you know, the character's name is Marla, not Marla Singer. I would appreciate if you wouldn't change all the names over to Marla Singer. Thank you. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 17:40, 6 December 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
:It's not a problem. There are reasons outside of the 'pedia even that the character's name is Marla though, not Marla Singer (see the [[Marla]] page for a note on the topic). --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 17:46, 6 December 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== Fight and Flight - 0001 ==
 +
 +
...are you trying to pick a fight?
 +
:~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 09:47, 8 December 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
:...I'm having a hard time finding "lonelygirl15 video 0001".
 +
::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 16:44, 9 December 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
::I don't have to look into the history of "some of the videos", because I was the one who changed it in ''all'' of the videos. But had ''you'' checked the [http://www.lg15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=Fight_and_Flight&diff=91420&oldid=90682 history] of the page you were "fixing", you'd have seen that it wasn't an oversight on the way, but a very targeted edit. :P
 +
::Hint: I also placed a link in the edit summary when I did the revert. ;)
 +
:::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 16:36, 10 December 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== Pic ==
 +
 +
Your new picture is borderline terrifying...[[User:Nancypants|Nancypants]] 15:44, 27 February 2008 (CST)
 +
: Is that a problem, I wasn't aware :O [[User:SilverBULLETx3|SilverBULLETx3]] 19:05, 27 February 2008 (CST)
 +
 +
== RE: And why exactly did you take Gemma out of Former TAAG members? ==
 +
For the same reason it wasn't listed before: No one usually means Gemma when talking about the TAAG. The TAAG is the core group of people road-tripping/on the running/ceremonying around in the series. Not some blogger girl on the other side of the world.<br>
 +
Not to mention that, by the time the term was coined by Tachyon, Gemma had already been exposed as a member of the Order/OpAphid ''and apparently died''. Thus, it is impossible for her to ever have been part of any grouping referred to as TAAG.<br>
 +
So, if the definition on the page really does fit the description as you claim, all that means is that the description is flawed.
 +
:~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 17:03, 16 March 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 00:58, 5 June 2011

This is SilverBULLETx3's talk page. Please start a new section when discussing a new issue and feel free to just chat! :) Note: On the forums, I am known as xovonchezio. I also go by silverX3 on here as my nickname.

Your edit to Aunt Alex

This was probably an accident, but you replaced two instances of the word "########" with "########" in the article Aunt Alex. I reverted it, but I just thought I'd let you know.--Jonpro 11:37, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

  • Yeah, it was an accident. It happened when I edited it, but I didn't touch a thing on the word ########. I noticed it happened and I have no idea how. My computer gets all crazy with the censoring and stuff, so that would happen. Sorry for the inconvenience! --SilverBULLETx3 15:05, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
Wow, that is weird. It even censored the word on this page when you added your comment. If you want to edit a page and your computer is doing that, maybe let someone know so they can fix it for you after you've made your changes. No problem though, and thanks for your contributions.--Jonpro 15:24, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
Well, thank you! :) --SilverBULLETx3 13:10, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

Small request

I noticed that your user page was the only page on the LGPedia using {{Blogpic}}. Would you mind if I changed it to {{FakeBlog2}} so that {{Blogpic}} can be deleted? It's no problem, really, just trying to do a little cleanup. If you want to change it yourself or whatever, that's fine too--it is your userpage.--Jonpro 18:21, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Sure, change it. But don't change the links, tags, pics, or anything else. Just the template. I don't mind. --SilverBULLETx3 16:55, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
Okay, I changed the template to {{FakeBlog2}}. It looks exactly the same except without borders and it's a little smaller I think. Anyway, thanks for responding.--Jonpro 17:40, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Discussion pages

There's no reason to create discussion pages with only "Discussion page." as the text. If you want to start a discussion, then by all means do so, but otherwise they can just be left alone.--Jonpro 16:23, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Sorry. I was looking on the community portal and the top 5 most requested pages, and a few talk pages were on there, so I figured why not create them. But I'm sorry if that was a nuisance as well. I'm an amateur LGPedia editor, so please bear with all of my mistakes. I know I do that a lot. -SilverBULLETx3 17:55, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
It's not a big deal really, just more of an unnecessary thing. I don't think the wanted pages list is ever going to be completely empty, so we'll just have to deal with some redlinks. And sorry if I'm being kind of ####### you. I know it's tough starting out. Just don't be afraid to ask questions, no matter how silly they seem.--Jonpro 18:02, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
Cool. That is true, people will always try to link to more and more stuff, that we just won't be able to handle on the LGPedia. It's okay - I've gotten to know some people on here and the forums, and I'm doing well. And I want a new video! xD --SilverBULLETx3 18:04, 4 May 2007 (CDT)

Thank you

Thank you for resurrecting, the character redesign and for all your help with. The first time around, no one seemed very interested, but now it's a reality -misty 11:04, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

You're welcome. :) I didn't even know about the redesign page until looking at the talk page, and then I decided right then and there that I was going to contribute. And I'm glad that it's a reality, too. SilverBULLETx3 14:38, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

How many edits

Sure thing. When you're logged in, look at the upper-right hand corner of the window and click on "my contributions". The list of all the edits you've made will come up. The way I count them is I click on "500", so it displays in lists of 500 edits, and then I count how many pages I have. When I run out of "500" edits pages, I narrow down to "100" and finish counting like that. Hope that helps, let me know if I wasn't clear enough. OwenIsCool 18:17, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

You have over 200 edits =)
OwenIsCool 18:18, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Okay, I just got your message and was going to count, obviously kind of confused, and got your other message. Over 200 edits? Sweetness. =D silverX3 18:19, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

Confusion?

Hi I'm thinking you might be over looking the In Use template over in plot holes, but I just notice while I was doing my research that You've been editing while I'm editing. I'e incorperated a lot of your input into the design. I just wanted to notify you just in case some of my work gets conflicted. Thanks! <3 --Killthesmiley 11:01, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

Sorry, Killthesmiley, I just hope we can edit different sections and not have any edit conflicts. Of course, if there are any conflicts, your changes can be saved, not mine. :) Thanks for understanding.   •Silver•   Talk | Contribs 11:03, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

Whazzup?

Heyyy you're 12 too. FINALLY. haha. Love, -R- 13:17, 17 July 2007 (CDT)

Gosh, same with me. Now I have another chance for them to get into some of it with KateModern *dies* Love, -R- 17:26, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
Ha, yeah, mostly they were just "...what" and I just send everyone the second one so I'm due for some resonses soon, haha Love, -R- 17:35, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
The first review: "boy she fidgets a lot" hahah. I have been watching since around the hiking video, but I just now started getting involved around November. Love, -R- 17:41, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
Second review "uh.. ok? ajksfajd I like hotdogs" I have weird friends. haha. Love, -R- 17:45, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
ugh, I can't even deal my friends lonelycrack, stupid goodie-goodies. HAVEN'T THEY EVER HEARD OF PEER PRESSURE!? heh, the worst part is KM is on bebo xP there videos don't load good on my computer. The good thing, a person is uploading them on youtube on the account KateModernLG15. Love, -R- 17:53, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
YES THEY DO! Gosh, they support me in my video producing, but every time I watch videos there all "Who's that? dasfjasdf? OM<G iayfaj DO YOU KNOW THEMeaihtkufuaiyrae4ri *spaz attack*" So I downloaded firefox, which I have always loved, and put it in a file in the WAYY back of my computer so they can't see what I do in the cookies or history. Love, -R- 18:00, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
"Something my friend Jim sent me. Boy, he's a weird person!" Love, -R- 18:05, 18 July 2007 (CDT)

Hmmm *scratches head* nope not me! I actually don't do much on Wikipedia, people intimidate me (xP) I don't even remember my old username! (haha!) I just stick to small Wikis that follow a theme, like here, or the HRwiki (the homestar runner wiki)! Otherwise... Wikipedia is just a resource! haha Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [2:16 PM, Central Daylight]

YES! Oh my god, it made me jump out of my seat! Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [7:59 PM, Central Daylight]
Ha, yeah. I'm on. Probably not for long, but we can still chat. Whats up? Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [1:26 AM, Central Daylight]

You know, I still have no idea. Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [Aug 17, 07 - 6:34 PM, Central Daylight]


Thanks

Thanks for the offer and the good luck dont worry im not alone in making this ARG ive got somebody helping me. Unfortunately my ARG will most likely have NO drops in it for reasons I will try to reveal someday. F-22 Raptor

Thanks

for what you have done on the sandbox i like the new look--Houdini 12:37, 29 July 2007 (CDT)

sure lets just add whatever and sort it out later

what do you think--Houdini 12:45, 29 July 2007 (CDT)

I finished it what do you think.--Houdini 15:40, 29 July 2007 (CDT)
hey thanks i worked hard on it--Houdini 21:18, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

Absolutely Amazing

Hey Silver, phenomenal (sp?) job on the Season I Recap! Zoey and I have been having nightmares about that page! --Pheon 19:13, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

Thanks, Pheon. I myself was worried that it would never get quite finished. I've watched it like a million times so I basically did the transcript from memory, so there might be a few mistakes. Thanks though!   •Silver•   Talk | Contribs 01:19, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

Moving Pages

If you start moving pages around on the 'pedia, do you mind making sure that the corresponding pages that link to that page are moved as well? (Click "What Links Here" on the sidebar to find the pages that link to any given page.) Otherwise you just start creating redirects all over the place. Thanks. --Zoey 00:18, 17 October 2007 (CDT)

C-LA

Love it. So obnoxious. :-D ~ JBSHRYNE 03:00, 30 October 2007 (CDT)

Haha thanks. :-D
  •Silver•   Talk | Contribs 14:59, 30 October 2007 (CDT)

Headers

Please please PLEASE do not go and add headers to the redearth88 videos. Like I said in my edit summaries of the pages, they will be added automatically to the template. All you will be doing is creating more work, because they will have to be removed. Thanks. --Zoey 09:44, 3 November 2007 (CDT)

It's not a problem. I just wanted to let you know before you got too far. The template will be adding them as soon as someone codes it, just waiting on the person who will actually do that :) --Zoey 09:46, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
That should be taken care of in the template itself. But if you're looking for ways to help, it would be great if you could go through all the characters and actors/crew for redearth88 and change where it says part of Maddison Atkins to part of Redearth (or whatever the exact wording is, I'm sure you can figure it out). Leave characters that were JUST in Maddison Atkins saying Maddison Atkins (for instance, leave Maddison Atkins and Faye Austin as they are) but for the rest of them, change it. It would be a HUGE help to me if you could do that. Thanks. --Zoey 09:57, 3 November 2007 (CDT)

Yay, thanks SO much!! Just a minor thing though, you don't have to specify that it's BOTH the prologue and the regular redearth88. You can just say "the Redearth88 video series" -- that would work best I think. Thanks again! --Zoey 10:01, 3 November 2007 (CDT)

Wondering Why

So, I've been looking at a lot of your edits lately, and I'm kind of confused as to why you've been doing them? There is a discussion going on at Lucy's Balcony#OpAphid mess regarding the OpAphid changes, and it's linked from the "Active Discussions" thing on the recent changes page, but it seems like you've totally ignored it and just continued making changes. Could you please comment on there before continuing any further?

Also, I'm wondering why you've been redirecting all these images recently. I know we had agreed to do it for images that were listed on the "List of Videos" page, but you've been doing it for everything... normal video images... location page images... why? It makes everything harder to keep track of... harder to see what images have been categorized and what haven't... harder to read any image descriptions or whatever, etc. Plus, plenty of times images are used in more than one place, and if they redirect to a certain page, it may not take you to the page you want to go to. And.. also, it's a lot harder when trying to snag an image for use on a page if you have to go to the page they redirect to, then unredirect yourself back to the image and snag the URL, etc. I just have no clue what the benefit of redirecting everything would be, and it's kind of been making my life a lot harder since you've been doing it, so I was wondering if you didn't have good reason for doing so, could you please stop? Thanks. --Zoey 20:02, 7 November 2007 (CST)

Marla Singer

Just so you know, the character's name is Marla, not Marla Singer. I would appreciate if you wouldn't change all the names over to Marla Singer. Thank you. --Zoey 17:40, 6 December 2007 (CST)

It's not a problem. There are reasons outside of the 'pedia even that the character's name is Marla though, not Marla Singer (see the Marla page for a note on the topic). --Zoey 17:46, 6 December 2007 (CST)

Fight and Flight - 0001

...are you trying to pick a fight?

~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 09:47, 8 December 2007 (CST)
...I'm having a hard time finding "lonelygirl15 video 0001".
~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 16:44, 9 December 2007 (CST)
I don't have to look into the history of "some of the videos", because I was the one who changed it in all of the videos. But had you checked the history of the page you were "fixing", you'd have seen that it wasn't an oversight on the way, but a very targeted edit. :P
Hint: I also placed a link in the edit summary when I did the revert. ;)
~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 16:36, 10 December 2007 (CST)

Pic

Your new picture is borderline terrifying...Nancypants 15:44, 27 February 2008 (CST)

Is that a problem, I wasn't aware :O SilverBULLETx3 19:05, 27 February 2008 (CST)

RE: And why exactly did you take Gemma out of Former TAAG members?

For the same reason it wasn't listed before: No one usually means Gemma when talking about the TAAG. The TAAG is the core group of people road-tripping/on the running/ceremonying around in the series. Not some blogger girl on the other side of the world.
Not to mention that, by the time the term was coined by Tachyon, Gemma had already been exposed as a member of the Order/OpAphid and apparently died. Thus, it is impossible for her to ever have been part of any grouping referred to as TAAG.
So, if the definition on the page really does fit the description as you claim, all that means is that the description is flawed.

~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 17:03, 16 March 2008 (CDT)