Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Userbox"
 (→Redesigning)  | 
				m (→Redesigning)  | 
				||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| forum-posts =  | | forum-posts =  | ||
| actor       =  | | actor       =  | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| blogs       =  | | blogs       =  | ||
| unseen      =  | | unseen      =  | ||
| Line 42: | Line 40: | ||
:I'm not using either of that on my userpage, but I must say it looks a lot better than the clutter usually seen on userpages; unfortunately, said clutter is exactly the problem: [[User:Zoey|Zoey]], for example, uses 15 userboxes; stacked on the right, that'd give an approximate height of {{#expr: 15 * (50+5+5+8)}}px ''just for the userboxes alone''. Seeing your userpage, I assume ''you'''d have no problem with that, but I, personally, think it's a waste of space. Why would I scroll down three pages just to see who(m?) a user would like to see naked?  | :I'm not using either of that on my userpage, but I must say it looks a lot better than the clutter usually seen on userpages; unfortunately, said clutter is exactly the problem: [[User:Zoey|Zoey]], for example, uses 15 userboxes; stacked on the right, that'd give an approximate height of {{#expr: 15 * (50+5+5+8)}}px ''just for the userboxes alone''. Seeing your userpage, I assume ''you'''d have no problem with that, but I, personally, think it's a waste of space. Why would I scroll down three pages just to see who(m?) a user would like to see naked?  | ||
::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 20:25, 15 August 2007 (CDT)  | ::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 20:25, 15 August 2007 (CDT)  | ||
| + | :::Well, I understand that! I mean, there can be an option in the template saying if you'd want it to be aligned or not. {{User:-R-/SignatureD|Aug 15, 07 - 8:39 PM}}  | ||
| + | :::O.K., I added a Sandbox template at [[User:-R-/Sandbox/Userbox]]. Heres my example of the template:  | ||
| + | :::{{User:-R-/Sandbox/Userbox  | ||
| + |   |position = left  | ||
| + |   |border-c = #000  | ||
| + |   |id-c     = #c66  | ||
| + |   |id-s     = 12  | ||
| + |   |id-fc    = #000  | ||
| + |   |info-c   = #f99  | ||
| + |   |info-s   = 8  | ||
| + |   |info-fc  = #fff  | ||
| + |   |id       = [[Image:Lazyeye.jpg|56px]]  | ||
| + |   |info     = This user's favorite lg15 character is '''[[Bree]]'''.  | ||
| + | }}{{clr}}  | ||
| + | :::or...  | ||
| + | :::{{User:-R-/Sandbox/Userbox Bree  | ||
| + | |position = left  | ||
| + | }}{{clr}}  | ||
| + | :::And for right,  | ||
| + | :::{{User:-R-/Sandbox/Userbox Bree|right}}{{clr}}  | ||
| + | :::Sooooooo... did I do good? Hah, I'm still not good at templates xP {{User:-R-/SignatureD|Aug 15, 07 - 9:50}}  | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it's a good thought, but I just can't see how it could practically work.  It would cause pages to scroll neverendingly if people had a bunch of boxes (like myself).  I appriciate the idea, and the effort you've put into it, but my vote is, unfortunatly, to keep the boxes the way they currently are. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 23:58, 19 August 2007 (CDT)  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oh, I'm saying the user can choose which ones go on the left, and which ones don't. {{user:-R-/SignatureD|Aug 20, 07 - 12:13PM}}  | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Hm, yeah.  I'm also not sure how I feel about all the dead space around the images.  It just looks kind of... empty and weird.  I don't know how to describe it better... sorry... --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 00:00, 21 August 2007 (CDT)  | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Thats fine, I just tested it, and it doesn't work in IE. {{User:-R-/SignatureD|12:03 AM}}  | ||
| + | ::::Hurr? Looks fine to me in IE. Unless, of course, you expected the '''moz'''illa-only styles to work in IE.  | ||
| + | :::::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 03:44, 24 August 2007 (CDT)  | ||
| + | :::::Oh, well I have a really, really, '''really''' old version of IE. I don't even know what version!{{user:-R-/SignatureD|5:18PM}}  | ||
Latest revision as of 14:28, 16 March 2009
Fixed?
By adding those two extra pixels in height, I think the majority of the userboxes are now the same height, and should format correctly, fixing most of the problems with people's user pages. -BRUCKER 
 (Home/Talk/Contribs) 12:07, 8 March 2007 (CST)
Redesigning
I was thinking of redesigning the userboxes to look like the person template... like this:
|   | 
This user's favorite lg15 character is Bree. | 
and then we can align them right to go under the FanPerson template. So it would look like:
|  Taylor Dreams | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  | |||||
| Person information | |||||
| Age | 18+ | ||||
| Birthday | 6.6.6 | ||||
|   | 
This user's favorite lg15 character is Bree. | 
|   | 
This user's favorite lg15 stuffed character is Purple Monkey. | 
Is that a good idea? Questions, comments? Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [Aug. 15. '07 - 7:58 PM, Central Daylight]
- I'm not using either of that on my userpage, but I must say it looks a lot better than the clutter usually seen on userpages; unfortunately, said clutter is exactly the problem: Zoey, for example, uses 15 userboxes; stacked on the right, that'd give an approximate height of 1020px just for the userboxes alone. Seeing your userpage, I assume you'd have no problem with that, but I, personally, think it's a waste of space. Why would I scroll down three pages just to see who(m?) a user would like to see naked?
 
- O.K., I added a Sandbox template at User:-R-/Sandbox/Userbox. Heres my example of the template:
 
|   | 
This user's favorite lg15 character is Bree. | 
- or...
 
|   | 
This user's favorite lg15 character is Bree. | 
- And for right,
 
|   | 
This user's favorite lg15 character is Bree. | 
- Sooooooo... did I do good? Hah, I'm still not good at templates xP Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [Aug 15, 07 - 9:50, Central Daylight]
 
I think it's a good thought, but I just can't see how it could practically work.  It would cause pages to scroll neverendingly if people had a bunch of boxes (like myself).  I appriciate the idea, and the effort you've put into it, but my vote is, unfortunatly, to keep the boxes the way they currently are. --Zoey 23:58, 19 August 2007 (CDT)
- Oh, I'm saying the user can choose which ones go on the left, and which ones don't. Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [Aug 20, 07 - 12:13PM, Central Daylight]
 
- Hm, yeah. I'm also not sure how I feel about all the dead space around the images. It just looks kind of... empty and weird. I don't know how to describe it better... sorry... --Zoey 00:00, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
 
- Thats fine, I just tested it, and it doesn't work in IE. Love, Randy (Say Wha'? | Whachu Doin'?) [12:03 AM, Central Daylight]
 
- Hurr? Looks fine to me in IE. Unless, of course, you expected the mozilla-only styles to work in IE.