Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lonelyrioters untie"
From LGPedia
(vote to consolidate with Breeniversisms) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | I disagree. There's no reason to delete this. LG15 is what it is because of the fans. LGPedia articales are created by the fans for a reason. Lonelyrioters were created by the fans, | + | I disagree. There's no reason to delete this. LG15 is what it is because of the fans. LGPedia articales are created by the fans for a reason. Lonelyrioters were created by the fans, and they're just as real as any other part of this show. (was by 128.172.205.229) |
+ | |||
+ | :I vote for consolidation with Breeniversisms. I am fine with the creation of the term being enshrined somewhere, but it doesn't deserve its own page (at least as of yet). Really, when something like this has received its own page in the past, the page tends to decay rapidly and no one knows its there. Lonelyrioters Untie! has a better chance at being remembered if its on the Breeniversisms page. --[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] 14:36, 2 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 19:36, 2 October 2007
I disagree. There's no reason to delete this. LG15 is what it is because of the fans. LGPedia articales are created by the fans for a reason. Lonelyrioters were created by the fans, and they're just as real as any other part of this show. (was by 128.172.205.229)
- I vote for consolidation with Breeniversisms. I am fine with the creation of the term being enshrined somewhere, but it doesn't deserve its own page (at least as of yet). Really, when something like this has received its own page in the past, the page tends to decay rapidly and no one knows its there. Lonelyrioters Untie! has a better chance at being remembered if its on the Breeniversisms page. --Milowent 14:36, 2 October 2007 (CDT)