Difference between revisions of "Talk:Subjects Apprehended"
From LGPedia
(→Template Discussion: Order?) |
(→Template Discussion) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:I think the problem is a different one - is this an OpAphid video at all? The description clearly says "The Order", and it has ''no'' similarity to a previous OpAphid video. While this could, of course, be due to Glenn being replaced, it might as well mean that this is a video from the Order, as ''opposed'' to videos by OpAphid. (Meaning we'd have to add "Order" to Init and create an "order" blog template.) | :I think the problem is a different one - is this an OpAphid video at all? The description clearly says "The Order", and it has ''no'' similarity to a previous OpAphid video. While this could, of course, be due to Glenn being replaced, it might as well mean that this is a video from the Order, as ''opposed'' to videos by OpAphid. (Meaning we'd have to add "Order" to Init and create an "order" blog template.) | ||
::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 20:11, 26 March 2007 (CDT) | ::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 20:11, 26 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I don't think this is an OpAphid video. It isn't labeled OpAphid. Listing it as such without any proof is wrong. I think it should be treated like a regular LG15 video, only with "The Order" listed as the blogger, or even "unknown" as blogger. I agree there should be a "Order" blog template. [[User:Sappho|Sappho]] 20:45, 26 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:45, 27 March 2007
|
|
|
Psmith 19:39, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
Template Discussion
Ahh, time to bring up the discussion again. First of all, I don't think {{Aphid}} includes the capability for a cast, probably because there never was one before (exception:Miss Me?). I'm wondering if we should expand the template to include it. Also, what about credits and categories? Should we start treating OpAphid videos like regular LG15 videos (maybe by using {{Blog4}} with OpAphid as the blogger or something). I'm not sure what's best; just wanted to open up the discussion.--Jonpro 19:06, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
- I think the problem is a different one - is this an OpAphid video at all? The description clearly says "The Order", and it has no similarity to a previous OpAphid video. While this could, of course, be due to Glenn being replaced, it might as well mean that this is a video from the Order, as opposed to videos by OpAphid. (Meaning we'd have to add "Order" to Init and create an "order" blog template.)
- I don't think this is an OpAphid video. It isn't labeled OpAphid. Listing it as such without any proof is wrong. I think it should be treated like a regular LG15 video, only with "The Order" listed as the blogger, or even "unknown" as blogger. I agree there should be a "Order" blog template. Sappho 20:45, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
