Difference between revisions of "Template talk:KateModern locations"
From LGPedia
(→Proposed merge with Template:Locations) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Proposed merge with [[Template:Locations]]== | ==Proposed merge with [[Template:Locations]]== | ||
I swear I posted this before. Anyway, I proposed this to be merged with the regular locations template, as it seems to do the exact same thing with a different color scheme. It seems like it would be a lot simpler to merge the two and add an optional field to tag it as a KM location, like the blog template does currently. What does everyone else think? - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 14:29, 18 December 2007 (CST) | I swear I posted this before. Anyway, I proposed this to be merged with the regular locations template, as it seems to do the exact same thing with a different color scheme. It seems like it would be a lot simpler to merge the two and add an optional field to tag it as a KM location, like the blog template does currently. What does everyone else think? - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 14:29, 18 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | :I like this! Just like we did with the official Blog template, as well, 'cause I know it started out as a KMBlog template (I created it). '''Strong support.''' | ||
+ | ::<span style="background:DarkSlateGray">[[User:SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white"> '''•Silver•''' </font>]] <small>[[User talk:SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/SilverBULLETx3|<font color="white">Contribs</font>]]</small></span> 13:09, 23 December 2007 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 19:09, 23 December 2007
Proposed merge with Template:Locations
I swear I posted this before. Anyway, I proposed this to be merged with the regular locations template, as it seems to do the exact same thing with a different color scheme. It seems like it would be a lot simpler to merge the two and add an optional field to tag it as a KM location, like the blog template does currently. What does everyone else think? - Shiori 14:29, 18 December 2007 (CST)