Talk:Breeniverse Timeline

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search

i think instead of dates of vids, we should have actual events.--Skeeta 01:43, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

OpAphid updates?

Now that OpAphid is verifed to be canon, someone who is more familiar with the series than I should add some of the info to the timeline.--Brucker 15:43, 28 November 2006 (CST)

I'm not sure if it should necessarily be concluded. The Creators stated in the phorum that while they have endorsed OpAphid it is a 100% fan creation.--JayHenry 15:50, 28 November 2006 (CST)

This is frustrating; the dates seem to be jumbled. The Action of an Enemy - Be Careful is a response to They Disappeared..., but it was posted before it. What gives? Anyone know? --Brucker 20:50, 12 December 2006 (CST)


While I understand the reasoning behind mergin Breeniverse Timeline and Breeniverse I think I'd personally prefer to keep them separate. I think I'd rather see the Breeniverse page improved upon, and I don't think the best way of doing that is adding the Timeline. The Breeniverse, after all, includes people, places, organizations, events. And some of the most interesting meta-topics in the series are the way the Breeniverse and the real world can touch each other through the magical mirror of the internet. I think we could make Breeniverse into a really interesting article. What do y'all think?--JayHenry 16:45, 11 December 2006 (CST)

I tried to give the Breeniverse page a little more structure to take it in a more meaningful direction. Check it out and let me know if that's what you had in mind... byyeee. OwenIsCool 17:12, 11 December 2006 (CST)
I like the idea of making the Breeniverse article into a more fleshed out meta-discussion article. I don't think they should be merged, although in the end, they will have many things in common. --Brucker 15:37, 12 December 2006 (CST)

I think a merge is unnecessary. A Timeline really is a topic that warrants its own article. I think a brief summary or description needs to be included though before the table of contents. If no one objects, I will remove the merge template within the next couple of days. -- Twjaniak 16:56, 14 December 2006 (CST)


I'm not sure how to explain this, but I don't think this needs to be deleted. It's an attempt to make sense of the series from a chronological point of view. That's quite a feat since the information in the series is revealed in a haphazard fashion. It's neat to see the pieces come together in the order that they're supposed to have happened. It does need updating though, but just because it's behind doesn't mean it needs to be deleted. This is a very different project from The Story So Far. For example, if Bree says in April that her mom got into the religion when she was at Edinburgh, the timeline should be updated where it mentions Edinburgh to add the Hymn of One bit. On the Story So Far, the info would be added at the place of the video where it was mentioned. It just needs some TLC and maybe a Cleanup tag. OwenIsCool 10:42, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

Okay, fair enough, let's see what we can do with it. What do people think about all of the "____ posts the video _____" events? While some might be noteworthy (like Bree's first blog), others provide no more information and The Story So Far... is probably a better place to find that kind of information. I don't know, to me they just seem to clutter the page. Thoughts on this or other ways to improve this page?--Jonpro 11:31, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Agreed, it seems that there are lots of "____ posts _____", and those are really not that useful. It should be more like concise explanations of what happens. "Daniel begins stalking Bree", "Bree references a "fan" response from Jonas", "Nikki Bower explains that the Order can't see Bree's videos anymore", are good examples. Maybe the best way to do it is to go through the "____ posts ____" parts and see whether any of them are worth rephrasing. OwenIsCool 13:35, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
I think there is way too much redundant information here, which can be found in "the story so far". If we decide to keep it it should be trimmed down to a chronology of major events and should not report blogs at all, nor should it report minor events which don't need to be understood in a timeframe context. -misty 16:14, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
I've gone through and reorganized the first couple of months. Part of the problem, I think, is that the formatting of this article is pretty awkward. Using ==Sections== and ===Subsections=== for every entry makes the page cumbersome. Anyone have any ideas of how to improve the layout? Do people like what I've done so far? --JayHenry 13:34, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
Wikipedia year pages. They look nice to me, not too messy.
You are doing great job, looks much much better. ;) psichopate 13:48, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

November 21st

Can somebody reword that for me? I'm drawing a blank, but I felt it was important to say how long Daniel had been in hiding, since he complains about it in the video. The thing is, he went into hiding shortly after the ceremony, and then came out of hiding for a few days around I Talked To My Parents, but that didn't last long. Can anyone say that clearly and concisely, or does anyone think it's more info than the timeline warrants? --Brucker 19:56, 31 January 2007 (CST)


I combined some changes I'd wanted to make months ago with psichopate's awesome idea of basing it after the Wiki year pages. I think it looks good, and more importantly, I finally got rid of that useful-but-kind-of-ugly-looking "custom TOC." Thoughts? ~ Jbshryne 13:06, 20 May 2007 (CDT)

Nicely done, I was thinking about something like that. -misty 13:19, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
I made a little modification, replacing the * with :, resulting in cleaner indents and no bullets -misty 15:19, 20 May 2007 (CDT)