Talk:It's Not Kidnapping

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
0187-JonasAgainstAWall.jpg 0187-DanielKidnappingJules.jpg 0187-JulesIsVeryScared.jpg

Psmith 05:17, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

Picture Debate

Erm... IMHO, the first pic was better. Mostly because I have a funny caption for it. --Jbshryne 23:14, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

I had a funny caption for it too! It was "dont worry Im not gonna hurt you! I just want to eat your fish taco" Now true that quote didnt really fit with the other ones but I think that one fits with this one because thats what most of these kidnappers want to do! --Xwestsidex 21:19, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Jbshryne, I gotta give it to ya, man. That is a funny ass picture!! And the quote fits hella good!! --Xwestsidex 21:19, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Hehe... thanks. --Jbshryne 23:24, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

More Picture Debate

I'm pretty sure we've totally exhausted the 'fish taco has sexual connotations' joke. I thought this photo was better because it showed more characters. It also gives a better visual of the lengths BDJ are willing to go. The other one was just a sad Jules? I dont know, when going through the video I did actually take a snap at that exact second too, because I thought it was a powerful image... I just think the one where Daniel is actually in the /act/ of kidnapping Jules is even MORE powerful in what it says. --Zoey 23:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

I certainly see your point. However, I still like mine better. :-> From a technical standpoint, though, your screencaps are a little small and low-quality. Is there any way for you to re-upload them, bigger? If not, I (or someone else, I'm sure) can help you. --Jbshryne 23:34, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
I really do not care to see another fish taco fight. It was really lame the first time it occurred. It is definitely uncalled for now considering Jules and the actress that plays her are obviously under age. Yes, Bree is 17 but Jessica Lee Rose is 20 so I can see as to why it was semi-acceptable to others. I really think it is uncalled for here. Chelseyrl 23:41, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
I do have a larger copy, but truth be told the quality is not that much better. It was a 'moving' shot, so everything is a bit shakey. And in general, I do prefer to upload smaller screenshots as they only need to be that small and it saves space on the Wiki when your images are tinier. Did you mean all of my screencaps are low quality though? Or just this one? Because I can kinda see what you mean about this one.. because as I said it was a moving shot... but the others too? Bleh.
Jbshyrne's caption was the Six Flags one. Xwestsidex added the fish taco comment. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there's no need to castigate Jb or anyone. Also, I do like this picture of Daniel kidnapping Jules. What a bizarre thing for TAAG to go. OwenIsCool 23:58, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
I'm not trying to attack JB or anyone, I'm just voicing why I believe it's wrong and how I really don't want to see another fish taco caption war. That's all... Chelseyrl 00:00, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Ack! Good god, I'm not in support of any 'taco'-related captions. Yuck. --Jbshryne 00:05, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
All right, cool, that's smart about saving space on the Wiki. I apologize for the general-sounding criticism. However, I'm not a fan of this particular pic, largely because of the movement. To still capture the "active" kidnapping, I would suggest a pic from around 0:45, or perhaps the YouTube thumbnail pic? Ultimately, though, as an LG Hard Work Award recipient, I will differ to your judgement. :-> --Jbshryne 00:05, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
I can upload a better version of the picture, I'll do it in a few minutes. I don't think there any context for Fish taco here a caption need to fit the context, and there's probably never going to be a context for it. -misty 00:07, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Ok I uploaded a replacement, that was the full frame size, and a couple frames from the original. The picture was more stable, but still had the same feel as the one uploaded before. -misty 00:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

I just realized OIC wasn't talking to me. Haha, whoops. Carry on folks. Chelseyrl 00:26, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

OIC, who WERE you refering to there? XD Because if it was me, I totally was not intending to either. -die- Sorry if it sounded like I was? I just was saying that in general, we HAVE exhausted the fish taco thing. Yeah. --Zoey 00:43, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Haha, sorry if I added a little confusion to the already mixed up discussion. I noticed that Xwestsidex complimented JB on the picture and said the caption was funny. Then I noticed people complaining about the fish taco reference. I hadn't been following the edit history, so I thought this meant that JB had made a fish taco joke, which was why Xwest thought it was funny. This didn't seem like JB to me, so I checked the edit history and realized that JB had put up the "Six Flags" caption, and then Xwest changed it. I thought others were also wrongly thinking it was JB who made the fish taco joke, so I jumped into the fray to stand up for him. Turns out it wasn't necessary. You all understood each other better without my help =)
OwenIsCool 02:46, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Hehe. Nah, Xwest has a LONG standing history of inappropriate jokes, mostly revolving around the Fish Taco incident. JB on the other hand... well... doesn't. But yay for standing up for people. I would have totally done the same if I had been thinking what you were :) --Zoey 11:54, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Nah what happened was I first posted something having to do with fish tacos, and JBshryne posted one that I thought was funny as all hell at the same time, with the picture and all. And I was like "damn, thats hella funny!" and was laughin my ass off, so I gave JB props and left the caption alone. Hope that clears things up.--Xwestsidex


I hope they keep posting to Youtube early now. I think if they drop more advertising for into the vids, they don't need to post them on the site first and we can get some more users. JapanMIke 06:21, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

I'm personally upset that it was posted at YouTube first and not Revver. It just seemed out of order. Chelseyrl 14:44, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Wow, I didn't realize it was posted on YouTube first. I guess I'll have to keep a better eye on the YouTube account in case they do that again.--Jonpro 14:51, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

I'd rather them be posted on Revver on the lg15 site. It just makes more sense.


Helicopters don't really sound like lawnmowers. **Has had lawncare professionals in her neighborhood on a regular basis** Lawnmowers are roaring engines whereas choppers have a distinct "thwock thwock thwock thwock" **also lives in a bad neighborhood where helicopters are a regular occurrence** --Nieriel.Manwathiel

I agree, the sound is def. not a lawnmower but I don't want to change the note because I know some other people will beg to differ. Chelseyrl 12:24, 10 May 2007 (CDT)

Cleaning Up Notes

Should "This video contains yet another attempt by BDJ to try and justify a criminal act" really be "This is the second video in which Bree, Daniel, and Jonas try to justify a criminal act" (or something in that nature). Is this note really necessary? If it is, wiki-type articles are supposed to sound like your explaining things in depth but simply, like explaining things to a child. I don't think our nickname "BDJ" belongs in the article. Just my thoughts though. --Babyktee 00:54, 9 May 2007 (CDT)