Talk:No Trespassing

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
0185-TaylorSmiling.jpg 0185-JonasCarryingBree.jpg 0185-SarahAndTaylor.jpg

Psmith 06:49, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

4:51 vs. 2:23

I had seen the video at it's full duration of 4:51 and some people in the forum feel cheated because the current one is now 2:23. I'd just like to point out that the original did kind of drag a little bit, so you didn't miss much. I don't have any proof of this, but I'd just thought I'd post it. Chelseyrl 00:30, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Wow, I believe you saw the longer one but that's kind of odd that that happened. Maybe the Creators had two versions saved and accidentally uploaded the wrong one and had to change it really quick. Well, whatever happened, this is what we have now. Do you remember anything else that was added in the longer version that wasn't in this one? (Sorry, I'm sure a lot of people will ask you that.)--Jonpro 00:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Surprisingly, I remembered a lot. Okay, so in the original there was something in the beginning with Sarah teasing Daniel. Daniel also had said that he would marry Taylor in about 18 yrs (or 15... I can't remember) and they both laughed. There was a lot more skateboarding stuff with Jonas and Bree. There was this whole other point with the guys on the tennis court talking about how in Texas it's legal to shoot Trespassers. The guys also had explained that the girls were going to distract the dog. There was a longer part about who was going to crawl through the window (as well as different forms of choosing). Sarah said (when running) "I don't want to get shot". The whole shaky camera, surveying the perimeter part was a little longer. The beginning of the video I saw basically, from my POV, showed Daniel being very peeved with Sarah's jokes. Daniel emphasized more that BDJ were all "just friends". Chelseyrl 00:44, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Sweet, thanks. I wonder if the Creators could be convinced to change it back to the longer version now that people know that it exists. Hmmm, maybe not...--Jonpro 00:53, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Haha, who knows. I PM'd them about it. But, I must admit, I like the compressed version better but wish that they kept more of the skateboarding scenes. Chelseyrl 00:55, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
I added to the notes about this little quirk. i copie chelseyrl's description of the deleted stuff from her forum post it. --Milowent 10:02, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Sexual tension

i almost wish there was a page dedicated to tracking the sexual tension build between characters. does anybody feel up to it? - platypus may 2 2007 23:42 PT

  • Lol, I was actually thinking the same thing a few days ago. I was actually trying to work out how it would be set up in my head. So yeah, I may do it :) --Zoey 10:48, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
  • i might give you a hand but yeah... i didnt want to be the only person intersted in it. i sort of put together the 'drunk' and 'sunglasses' page and im not sure how appreciated that one is. basicly, there should be a page for every reocurring theme. maybe even a page dedicated to the clothes that people wear? platypus may 3 2007 10:11 PT
Does not this page have that? Relationships (It does, by the way...)  :D Anto 14:46, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
I just made that today based on this talk page discussion! ;) --Zoey 16:26, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Oh....whoops! :DAnto 01:52, 4 May 2007 (CDT)

Sarah or Taylor at the end of the vid

I would have assumed that it was Sarah holding the camera when she was running away from the house going all "crap crap crap" and then it's obviously Taylor saying she didn't know why it didn't work, but the page has it listed as Taylor the entire time...did I miss something?

I presumed it was Sarah, too. Too many people have the camera, it's confusing!

Hmm, I guess it is hard to tell. I think it sounds more like Taylor, but it's hard to tell since she's talking in an exasperated voice. How about we start a huge debate about it that will eventually digress into a flame war? :) Or, we could just figure it out peacefully....--Jonpro 10:39, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

I think it's definitely Sarah because she was the one that was over by that side of the house that is shown when she is running. Chelseyrl 12:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

I agree that it's most definitely Sarah: It was decided that she would go try and find a way in, and she had the camera with her when she went. It's just illogical to think that on her way escaping Taylor suddenly has the camera. Of course, if there is some bit that was cut from the orginal version that would explain this (like Sarah not being able to find a way in and Taylor deciding to give it a shot), then its possible. But from the way its currently edited, we have to figure the writers intended us to beleive that it was Sarah running going all "crap crap crap." -- Phoenician
Okay, sounds like Sarah is the consensus. I'll change the transcript to reflect that.--Jonpro 13:30, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
It makes alot more sense that it was Sarah, but I listened and it was defiantly Taylor's voice. I think it was originally supposed to be Taylor, but the Creators re-edited it, and decided to make Sarah, and hoped no one would notice the voice. -misty 18:56, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
I listened to it again and I heard Sarah. Part of my basis is on the version I saw, the voice was def. Sarah's. (The running part was longer). Seems like we have another "Uncle Dan" situation. Chelseyrl 21:19, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Sarah vs. Sara?

On the LGPedia (this page, Sarah's page, Crazy Emo Chick and Taylor's page), Sara's name is spelled Sarah. But in this description, it is spelled Sara. I will get to work on this right away. --SilverBULLETx3 15:04, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Hold the phone one second. I noticed that too and that's why I created the redirect at Sara. However, her MySpace page has "Sarah" on it, so I think we can assume that's the right spelling. It's believable that Bree just mispelled her name or didn't know how to spell it in the first place. And thanks for putting a note here, but make sure you get agreement before starting to change everything.--Jonpro 15:08, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Oh. I'm sorry, I didn't see the MySpace - I didn't even know Sarah had one. Sorry about all the changes I made. :( Bad me. --SilverBULLETx3 15:10, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
It's ok. Just don't get too hasty. That's why we have talk pages and discussion--so you can make sure that the changes you're going to make are a good idea. Anything that's going to require a lot of pages being changed should really be talked about first.--Jonpro 15:17, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
For the possibility of future characters, I think it would be safe to say that we have to be careful. Bree seems to not be the best at remembering spellings of names. Chelseyrl 15:41, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Would it be appropriate to fix "Bree's" mistake in the description? I say yes -misty 22:54, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
I don't think so? The description should reflect what the actual description says? I mean, we haven't corrected Bree's many "Julies" in spite of the fact that her name is Julia/Jules. --Zoey 23:16, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Charles Manson

I just thought it would be interesting. Sarah mentions Charles Manson. CiW video had images from the Manson family murders. So many killers and they have to choose the same ones. psichopate 17:58, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Next thing you know, she'll be listening to her iPod and someone will ask what she's listening to and she'll say "Helter Skelter" :P. Chelseyrl 20:17, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Error in the script

A couple of the lines are attributed to the wrong characters. At the moment, it has Sarah saying "Well, who's gonna go through the window?" and then Bree saying "You can do that." When I watch the vid, it seems to me that Sarah's lips aren't moving for that first line and that it sounds much more like Bree. Then, for "You can do that," we actually do see Sarah's lips move. So the attributions are backwards. Lurker 15:35, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Thanks for pointing that out. It's fixed now.--Jonpro 16:19, 7 May 2007 (CDT)