Difference between revisions of "Template talk:FakeInit"
From LGPedia
(→A future problem: Déjà vu) |
m (→A future problem: Déjà vu) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Makes sense to me. Someone can go ahead and make the change if there aren't any objections in a few days or so. (I'll do it myself if I remember.)--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 23:21, 5 April 2008 (CDT) | :Makes sense to me. Someone can go ahead and make the change if there aren't any objections in a few days or so. (I'll do it myself if I remember.)--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 23:21, 5 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Fine by me. I only built it this way as an initial test to see how things would look. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 18:46, 6 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:46, 6 April 2008
A future problem: Déjà vu
Might I point out this previous thread about the problems of building an init template this way?
It might not be as pressing as with the official one, but still - with a better way around, why use the problematic way?
- Makes sense to me. Someone can go ahead and make the change if there aren't any objections in a few days or so. (I'll do it myself if I remember.)--Jonpro 23:21, 5 April 2008 (CDT)
- Fine by me. I only built it this way as an initial test to see how things would look. - Shiori 18:46, 6 April 2008 (CDT)
